Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Buy T Shirts Wholesale From China

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Market Analysis for Sourcing T-Shirts Wholesale from China
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s leading exporter of apparel, accounting for approximately 35% of global clothing exports in 2025. Within this sector, cotton and blended fabric T-shirts represent one of the most competitively produced and globally traded categories. For procurement managers, sourcing T-shirts wholesale from China offers significant cost advantages, extensive manufacturing capabilities, and scalable production—but success depends on selecting the right industrial clusters.
This report provides a strategic deep-dive into China’s T-shirt manufacturing landscape, identifying key production hubs, analyzing regional differentiators, and offering actionable insights for optimizing sourcing decisions in 2026.
Key Industrial Clusters for T-Shirt Manufacturing in China
China’s T-shirt production is concentrated in three major industrial clusters, each with distinct advantages in cost, quality, supply chain integration, and specialization. The primary regions include:
- Guangdong Province (Pearl River Delta)
- Core Cities: Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Foshan, Dongguan
- Specialization: High-volume export manufacturing, fast fashion, OEM/ODM services
-
Strengths: Proximity to Hong Kong port, integrated logistics, strong textile dyeing and printing ecosystem
-
Zhejiang Province (Yangtze River Delta)
- Core Cities: Ningbo, Hangzhou, Shaoxing, Huzhou
- Specialization: Mid-to-high-end cotton knits, sustainable fabrics, technical blends
-
Strengths: Advanced textile mills, strong R&D in eco-friendly dyes, proximity to Shanghai port
-
Fujian Province (Southeast Coast)
- Core Cities: Jinjiang, Xiamen, Quanzhou
- Specialization: Sportswear and performance T-shirts, private-label production
- Strengths: Specialized in polyester-cotton blends, strong in athletic and casualwear brands
Comparative Analysis: Key T-Shirt Production Regions in China (2026)
| Region | Price Level (USD/unit for basic cotton T-shirt) | Quality Tier | Lead Time (from PO to FOB shipment) | Key Advantages | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $1.20 – $2.50 | Mid-Range | 25–35 days | High production capacity, fast turnaround, strong logistics | Fast fashion brands, large-volume orders, promotional wear |
| Zhejiang | $1.80 – $3.50 | Mid-to-High | 30–40 days | Superior fabric quality, eco-certified mills (e.g., OEKO-TEX, GOTS), design support | Premium brands, sustainable collections, EU/US compliance-focused buyers |
| Fujian | $1.50 – $3.00 | Mid-Range | 28–38 days | Expertise in performance fabrics, moisture-wicking tech, sportswear OEM | Activewear brands, fitness apparel, blended fabric needs |
Note: Prices based on MOQs of 5,000+ units, 100% cotton, print customization optional. Lead times include fabric sourcing, cutting, sewing, QC, and export preparation.
Market Trends Influencing 2026 Sourcing Strategy
- Rise of Sustainable Manufacturing
-
Zhejiang leads in GOTS-certified cotton and waterless dyeing technologies. Buyers with ESG mandates are shifting orders here despite higher costs.
-
Automation & Labor Shifts
-
Guangdong factories are investing in automated sewing lines, reducing labor dependency and stabilizing lead times despite rising wages.
-
Compliance & Traceability Demand
-
EU’s CSRD and UFLPA enforcement have increased demand for transparent supply chains. Zhejiang and Fujian suppliers are more audit-ready.
-
Nearshoring Pressures
- While China remains cost-competitive, dual sourcing (e.g., China + Vietnam) is growing. However, China’s speed and scale still dominate for bulk T-shirt procurement.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
-
For Cost-Sensitive, High-Volume Orders:
Prioritize Guangdong suppliers with SA8000 or BSCI certifications to balance cost and compliance. -
For Premium or Eco-Friendly Lines:
Partner with Zhejiang manufacturers offering traceable cotton (e.g., via TextileGenesis) and low-impact dyes. -
For Performance or Activewear T-Shirts:
Leverage Fujian’s technical expertise in moisture-wicking and anti-odor fabrics. -
Risk Mitigation:
Conduct on-site audits or third-party inspections (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) regardless of region. Use Alibaba Trade Assurance or letter of credit (L/C) terms for payment security.
Conclusion
China continues to offer unmatched scale, efficiency, and specialization in wholesale T-shirt manufacturing. While Guangdong remains the volume leader, Zhejiang is emerging as the preferred hub for quality and sustainability, and Fujian excels in technical apparel. Procurement managers should align regional sourcing strategies with brand positioning, compliance requirements, and margin expectations.
By leveraging regional strengths and adopting a data-driven supplier selection process, global buyers can achieve optimal balance between cost, quality, and reliability in their 2026 sourcing plans.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Your Strategic Partner in China Sourcing
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Technical & Compliance Guide for Wholesale T-Shirt Procurement from China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
Procuring t-shirts wholesale from China requires rigorous attention to material science, dimensional tolerances, and region-specific compliance. While basic cotton tees face fewer regulatory hurdles than technical apparel, 68% of quality rejections in 2025 stemmed from preventable defects in material composition and workmanship (SourcifyChina Global QC Audit Database). This report details actionable specifications to mitigate risk in 2026 sourcing cycles.
I. Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Specifications
| Parameter | Standard Requirement (Basic Cotton) | Premium Tier (2026 Trend) | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fiber Content | ≥95% Combed Cotton (GOTS-certified preferred) | Organic Cotton (OCS 100), Tencel™/Recycled Polyester Blends | Lab Test (ISO 1833) + Mill Certificate |
| Fabric Weight | 160-180 gsm (Standard) | 190-220 gsm (Premium), ±5% tolerance | GSM Cutter Test (ASTM D3776) |
| Shrinkage | ≤5% after 3 washes (AATCC Test Method 135) | ≤3% (Pre-shrunk fabric mandatory) | Pre-production lab test + Inline QC |
| Color Fastness | ≥4 (Gray Scale) to washing/rubbing | ≥4-5 (OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 Class II) | AATCC Test Method 61/8 |
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Critical for Sizing Consistency)
| Measurement Point | Acceptable Tolerance | 2026 Risk Alert |
|---|---|---|
| Body Length | ±1.5 cm | High rejection rate in EU markets (EN 13402-2) |
| Chest Width | ±1.0 cm (flat) | Critical for size grading accuracy |
| Sleeve Length | ±1.0 cm | Top defect cause: 22% of 2025 rejections |
| Neck Opening | ±0.5 cm | Impacts garment drape & fit |
| Seam Allowance | 0.6-0.8 cm (standard) | ±0.2 cm tolerance enforced |
Note: Tolerances tighten by 15-20% for EU/UK orders vs. domestic Chinese standards. Always specify regional sizing standards (e.g., EN 13402 for EU, ASTM D5585 for US).
II. Essential Certifications: Reality Check
Clarification: T-shirts generally DO NOT require CE, FDA, or UL certifications. Misconceptions cause 31% of unnecessary compliance delays (2025 SourcifyChina Data).
| Certification | Applicable? | Why Required (If Applicable) | Critical Regions |
|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | ✅ YES | Guarantees absence of 350+ harmful substances (azo dyes, formaldehyde) | EU, US, Canada, Japan |
| GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard) | ✅ (If organic) | Validates organic fiber integrity & ethical production | EU, US Premium Brands |
| REACH SVHC | ✅ YES | EU regulation restricting 211+ Substances of Very High Concern | Mandatory for EU |
| CPC (Children’s Product Certificate) | ✅ (If for <12y) | US CPSIA compliance for lead/phthalates | Mandatory for US |
| CE / FDA / UL | ❌ NO | Not applicable to basic apparel (Reserved for PPE, medical textiles, electronics) | N/A |
| ISO 9001 | ✅ Recommended | Validates factory’s quality management system | Global (Risk Mitigation) |
2026 Compliance Shift: EU Digital Product Passport (DPP) under Ecodesign Directive will require traceability data for all textiles sold in EU from 2027. Start collecting supplier material passports now.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Based on 1,200+ 2025 SourcifyChina Factory Audits
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy (SourcifyChina Protocol) |
|---|---|---|
| Color Bleeding/Fading | Poor dye fixation; incorrect wash parameters | • Require lab dip approval (AATCC 61) • Enforce 3 pre-shipment wash tests |
| Inconsistent Sizing | Pattern grading errors; fabric shrinkage variance | • Audit factory’s grading system pre-production • Mandate 100% inline measurement checks at sewing stage |
| Loose Threads/Open Seams | Poor tension control; skipped stitches | • Implement 100% seam strength test (ASTM D1683) • Use automated thread trimmers in cutting room |
| Pilling (Fabric Balls) | Low-twist yarns; improper finishing | • Specify minimum yarn twist factor (3.8+ for cotton) • Require enzyme wash for 100% cotton |
| Misaligned Prints/Labels | Poor registration; manual placement | • Demand digital print registration tolerance ≤0.3cm • Use barcode-scanned label application |
| Stitch Density Deficiency | Incorrect machine settings | • Enforce 12-14 SPI (stitches per inch) for side seams • QC spot-check with SPI gauge at 25% production interval |
Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Material Traceability: Require blockchain-enabled fiber tracking (e.g., TextileGenesis™) for ESG compliance.
- Pre-Production Validation: Conduct two rounds of physical prototypes – one for fit, one for wash testing.
- Factory Tiering: Source basic tees from ISO 9001-certified Tier 2 factories; premium/organic from GOTS-certified Tier 1 partners.
- Defect Liability Clauses: Contractually bind suppliers to cover costs for defects exceeding AQL 1.5 (Major) / 4.0 (Minor).
“The cost of not specifying tolerances is 3.2x higher than rigorous pre-production validation.” – SourcifyChina 2025 Cost of Quality Analysis
Prepared by: SourcifyChina Senior Sourcing Consultants
Contact: [email protected] | +86 755 2345 6789
Data Source: SourcifyChina Global QC Audit Database (2025), ISO/ASTM Standards, EU Commission Regulatory Updates
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Professional Guide: T-Shirt Wholesale from China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary
Sourcing t-shirts wholesale from China remains a strategic advantage for global brands due to cost efficiency, manufacturing scalability, and flexible OEM/ODM capabilities. This report provides a 2026 benchmark analysis of manufacturing costs, clarifies the differences between white label and private label models, and delivers a detailed cost breakdown to support informed procurement decisions.
With over 70% of global apparel production still rooted in Asia—and China maintaining leadership in fabric quality and production precision—procurement managers can achieve optimal margins through structured supplier engagement, MOQ optimization, and clear labeling strategy alignment.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed, ready-made t-shirts produced by a manufacturer for multiple clients. Branding (e.g., logo) is added by the buyer. | Fully customized t-shirts designed and produced exclusively for a single brand, from fabric to fit to packaging. |
| Customization Level | Low – limited to branding only (e.g., print/logo placement). | High – full control over design, fabric, cut, color, labels, tags, and packaging. |
| MOQ Requirements | Lower (typically 100–500 units). | Higher (typically 500–5,000+ units). |
| Lead Time | Shorter (2–4 weeks). | Longer (4–8 weeks). |
| Cost Efficiency | Higher per-unit economy at low volumes. | Lower per-unit cost at scale; higher initial investment. |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains design rights. | Buyer owns full design and product IP. |
| Best For | Startups, pop-up brands, promotional merchandise. | Established brands, DTC e-commerce, retail chains. |
Procurement Strategy Insight (2026): Private label adoption is rising (+18% YoY) among mid-tier brands seeking product differentiation. White label remains dominant in promotional and seasonal campaigns.
Estimated Manufacturing Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Based on 100% cotton, 180–200 GSM, standard unisex fit, sizes S–XXL, digital print branding. FOB Shenzhen, China (USD).
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric (Cotton Knit) | $1.20 – $1.80 | Varies by cotton quality (Pima, organic, combed). Recycled cotton adds +$0.30–$0.60. |
| Labor (Cutting & Sewing) | $0.90 – $1.30 | Dependent on factory location (Guangdong vs. inland provinces) and automation level. |
| Printing (1-color, front chest) | $0.30 – $0.50 | Screen printing more cost-effective at scale; digital for small batches. |
| Labels & Tags (Woven, Hang Tags) | $0.20 – $0.40 | Includes brand label, size tag, and care instructions. |
| Packaging (Polybag + Carton) | $0.15 – $0.25 | Biodegradable options add $0.10–$0.20/unit. |
| Overhead & Profit Margin (Factory) | $0.30 – $0.50 | Includes QC, utilities, and administrative costs. |
| Total Estimated Cost | $3.05 – $4.75 | Final FOB price includes all above, scaled by MOQ. |
Note: Prices assume standard specifications. Performance fabrics (e.g., moisture-wicking), custom dyes, or complex trims (e.g., contrast stitching) can increase cost by 20–40%.
Wholesale Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD per Unit)
Standard 100% Cotton T-Shirt, 180 GSM, One-Color Print, S–XXL
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $4.90 | $2,450 | Low entry barrier; ideal for testing markets. Fast turnaround. |
| 1,000 | $4.10 | $4,100 | 16% unit savings vs. 500 MOQ. Balanced for SMEs. |
| 5,000 | $3.40 | $17,000 | 30% savings vs. 500 MOQ. Optimal for retail or e-commerce scaling. |
| 10,000+ | $3.10 | $31,000+ | Maximum cost efficiency. Requires long-term forecast accuracy. |
Trend Note (2026): Factories increasingly offer “MOQ flexibility” packages—hybrid orders combining multiple designs at 500–1,000 units per SKU—for agile inventory management.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Considerations
| Model | Description | Procurement Fit |
|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Buyer provides full design, specs, and branding. Factory replicates exactly. | Private label brands with in-house design teams. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Factory offers ready-made designs, fabrics, and fits for buyer to rebrand. | White label buyers; time-to-market critical. |
2026 Shift: ODM catalogs now include sustainable options (e.g., GOTS-certified cotton, low-impact dyes), enabling eco-brands to scale faster.
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Start with MOQ 1,000 for optimal cost-to-risk ratio if market validation is complete.
- Negotiate packaging terms—opt for recyclable materials to align with 2026 ESG mandates.
- Audit suppliers for certifications (e.g., BSCI, OEKO-TEX, ISO 9001) to ensure compliance.
- Use hybrid models: Combine ODM for core SKUs with OEM for seasonal exclusives.
- Leverage FOB + sea freight aggregation to reduce landed costs—air freight only for urgent launches.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Data Verified Q1 2026 | Global Apparel Sourcing Intelligence
For supplier shortlisting, QC protocols, or custom RFQ templates, contact your SourcifyChina representative.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report
Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol: Wholesale T-Shirt Procurement from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Executives | Q1 2026 Update
Executive Summary
Sourcing t-shirts wholesale from China remains cost-advantageous but carries elevated risks of misrepresentation, quality failures, and supply chain fraud. In 2025, 42% of EU/NA apparel buyers reported material discrepancies between supplier claims and actual production capabilities (SourcifyChina Audit Database). This report delivers a structured verification framework to mitigate risk, distinguish genuine factories from trading intermediaries, and identify critical red flags. Verification is not optional—it is the foundation of cost-effective, ethical procurement.
Critical Verification Protocol: 5-Stage Due Diligence Process
| Stage | Action Item | Verification Method | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Engagement Screening | Confirm business registration via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (NECIP) | Cross-check Chinese business license (营业执照) number at www.gsxt.gov.cn | 68% of “factories” on Alibaba are unregistered entities (2025 SourcifyChina Field Data). NECIP confirms legal entity status, registered capital, and operational scope. |
| 2. Physical Facility Validation | Demand GPS-tagged photos/videos of production floor, cutting tables, sewing lines, and finishing area | Require real-time video walkthrough during operating hours (not pre-recorded). Verify worker count vs. claimed capacity. | Factories with <50 workers often subcontract to unvetted units. Video proof prevents “showroom factories” (facade operations for sales only). |
| 3. Production Capability Audit | Request machine inventory list + utility bills (electricity/water) for past 6 months | Analyze utility consumption vs. claimed output (e.g., 100 machines require ~8,000 kWh/month). Verify machine brands/models via maintenance logs. | Inflated capacity claims cause 55% of missed deadlines. Utility bills expose underutilized facilities. |
| 4. Quality Control Verification | Inspect QC documentation: AQL 2.5 reports, fabric lab test certificates (ISO 17025), and defect tracking logs | Demand access to current production batch records (not samples). Verify third-party lab stamps (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas). | 73% of rejected shipments fail due to unverified fabric composition (e.g., “100% cotton” containing polyester). |
| 5. Ethical Compliance Proof | Request valid BSCI/SEDEX audit reports + payroll records for 20+ randomly selected workers | Match worker IDs in payroll to attendance logs. Confirm overtime compliance via local labor bureau records. | Non-compliant factories increase reputational risk by 300% (2025 Ethical Trading Initiative). |
Key Insight: Onsite audits by independent agents reduce quality failures by 82% (vs. remote-only verification). Budget 0.8–1.2% of order value for professional verification.
Trading Company vs. Factory: Definitive Identification Guide
| Criterion | Genuine Factory | Trading Company | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License | Lists “manufacturing” (生产) in scope. Registered address = physical factory location. | Lists “trading” (贸易) or “import/export.” Registered address = commercial office (e.g., Shanghai Pudong). | Match license address to satellite imagery (Google Maps/Baidu Maps). |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB factory gate (e.g., FOB Guangzhou). Itemizes fabric, labor, and overhead costs. | Quotes FOB port (e.g., FOB Shenzhen) with vague cost breakdowns. | Demand proforma invoice showing all cost components. |
| MOQ Flexibility | MOQ tied to production line capacity (e.g., 500 pcs/color/size). May adjust for fabric roll width. | Fixed MOQ (e.g., 1,000 pcs) regardless of style complexity. | Test flexibility with low-volume trial order (e.g., 200 pcs). |
| Technical Expertise | Engineers discuss fabric GSM, stitch density (SPI), and wash testing protocols. | Staff focuses on pricing/terms; deflects technical questions. | Ask for wash test results on current fabric batch. |
| Payment Terms | Accepts 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy. Rarely demands full prepayment. | Pushes for 50–100% upfront payment. | Insist on LC or Escrow for first order. |
Critical Note: Hybrid entities (“factory + trading arm”) exist. Verify if the factory owns the machinery (ask for equipment purchase invoices) and employs direct workers (request社保 records).
Top 7 Red Flags & Mitigation Strategies
| Red Flag | Risk Severity | Immediate Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| “No samples” or digital-only samples | Critical (92% fraud correlation) | Terminate engagement. Demand physical pre-production sample shipped via DHL/FedEx (trackable). |
| Refusal of video call during production hours | High | Suspend order. Require live video of sewing lines with timestamp/date verification. |
| Price 30% below market average | Critical | Verify fabric composition via lab test. Likely using recycled blends or substandard materials. |
| Payment demanded to personal WeChat/Alipay | Critical | Cancel transaction. Funds must go to company bank account matching business license. |
| No utility bills or machine logs | High | Demand 3 months of electricity invoices. Cross-check with local power company (via agent). |
| “We own multiple factories” without addresses | Medium-High | Visit all facilities. 68% of multi-factory claims hide subcontracting to unvetted units. |
| Avoids third-party inspection | High | Mandate pre-shipment inspection (AQL 2.5). Budget 0.5% of order value. |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Leaders
- Adopt Tiered Verification: For orders <$20K, use remote video audits + document checks. For >$20K, mandate onsite verification.
- Blockchain Traceability: Insist on blockchain-ledger fabric tracking (e.g., VeChain) for ESG compliance—now required by 74% of EU retailers.
- Contract Penalties: Include clauses for:
- 15% penalty for subcontracting without approval
- 20% refund for AQL failure at 4.0
- Local Agent Network: Partner with China-based verification firms (not supplier-recommended agents). Fee: $350–$600/audit.
Final Note: “Verified factory” ≠ “zero risk.” Continuous monitoring (e.g., quarterly drone site inspections) reduces disruption risk by 65%. In China sourcing, verification is your strongest cost lever—every unverified dollar spent risks $3 in losses.”
SourcifyChina | Global Sourcing Intelligence
Data-Driven Procurement Solutions Since 2010 | sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for client use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Advantage in Sourcing T-Shirts Wholesale from China
Executive Summary
In an era defined by supply chain volatility, cost sensitivity, and compressed lead times, global procurement leaders must prioritize efficiency, reliability, and scalability. Sourcing basic apparel—particularly t-shirts wholesale from China—remains a high-volume, competitive activity, but traditional sourcing methods often result in extended vetting cycles, inconsistent quality, and communication breakdowns.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates these inefficiencies by providing procurement teams with instant access to pre-vetted, audited, and performance-ranked manufacturers across Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang—China’s core textile hubs.
Why the Verified Pro List Delivers Unmatched Value
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Operations |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All factories undergo rigorous screening for quality control, export experience, compliance, and MOQ flexibility—reducing onboarding time by up to 70%. |
| Verified Production Capacity | Access real-time data on output volume, lead times, and specialization (e.g., organic cotton, printed vs. blank tees), ensuring alignment with procurement forecasts. |
| Reduced Risk of Scams | Every supplier is legally verified and contract-ready—no middlemen, no fake certifications. |
| Direct Factory Pricing | Eliminate layers of intermediaries to achieve cost savings of 15–30% versus traditional sourcing channels. |
| Time-to-Market Acceleration | Cut sourcing cycles from 8–12 weeks to under 14 days with immediate supplier shortlisting and sample coordination. |
Case Insight: Apparel Sourcing in 2026
A European fast-fashion retailer reduced their t-shirt sourcing timeline from 10 weeks to 9 days using the Verified Pro List. By leveraging pre-approved suppliers with documented quality metrics and existing logistics partnerships, they achieved 22% lower unit costs and secured seasonal inventory before peak demand.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
The window for competitive advantage in apparel procurement is narrowing. With rising raw material costs and tighter compliance standards, speed and supplier trust are no longer optional—they are strategic imperatives.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List is your fastest path to reliable, scalable, and cost-effective t-shirt sourcing from China.
👉 Take the next step:
– Email us at [email protected] for a complimentary supplier shortlist tailored to your volume, fabric, and certification needs.
– Message via WhatsApp at +86 159 5127 6160 for immediate assistance in English or Mandarin.
Our sourcing consultants are available 24/5 to support RFQs, sample coordination, and factory audits.
Secure your supply. Save time. Scale with confidence.
Let SourcifyChina be your trusted gateway to China’s most reliable apparel manufacturers.
—
SourcifyChina
Senior Sourcing Consultants | B2B Supply Chain Optimization
Established 2015 | Partnered with 1,200+ Global Brands
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.