Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Buy Socks In Bulk From China

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026: Sourcing Bulk Socks from China

Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants | Q1 2026

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global hub for bulk sock manufacturing, producing ~65% of the world’s socks (2025 Statista). While rising labor costs and sustainability pressures reshape the landscape, China’s integrated supply chains, scale, and evolving technical capabilities ensure its competitiveness for volume buyers. Strategic sourcing requires precise regional targeting: Zhejiang dominates volume/value segments, Guangdong excels in premium/technical socks, and Fujian leads in athletic/sneaker categories. This report identifies optimal clusters and provides data-driven benchmarks for procurement decisions.

---

Key Industrial Clusters for Bulk Sock Manufacturing

China’s sock industry is hyper-regionalized, with clusters specializing in specific materials, price tiers, and value-added services. The top 3 clusters (accounting for 85% of export volume) are:

Province/City	Core Hub	Specialization	Annual Output	Key Export Markets
Zhejiang	Zhuji (Dongbaiqiao)	Volume/value socks (cotton, acrylic, basic blends). World’s largest sock hub (70% of China’s output).	25+ billion pairs	EU, North America, LATAM
Guangdong	Dongguan/Foshan	Premium/fashion/technical socks (merino wool, bamboo, compression, smart textiles). Strong OEM/ODM capabilities.	8 billion pairs	North America, Japan, EU
Fujian	Jinjiang	Athletic/sneaker socks (moisture-wicking, seamless knitting). Hub for sportswear brands.	5 billion pairs	USA, South Korea, Vietnam
Emerging Cluster	Hebei (Gaoyang)	Cotton-rich basics (terry-loop, thermal). Lower-cost alternative to Zhejiang.	3 billion pairs	Russia, Central Asia, Africa

Why Clusters Matter in 2026: Regional specialization drives cost, quality, and speed efficiency. Zhuji’s ecosystem (yarn mills, dye houses, packaging) reduces logistics costs by 15–20% vs. fragmented regions. Dongguan factories invest in R&D (e.g., biodegradable yarns), while Jinjiang leverages proximity to sportswear giants like Anta and Li-Ning.

---

Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time Benchmarks

Benchmark based on 50+ SourcifyChina client engagements (Q4 2025) for 10,000-pair MOQ, mid-tier cotton blend socks (80% cotton/20% polyamide).

Region	Price Range (FOB China)	Quality Tier	Avg. Lead Time	Best Suited For
Zhejiang (Zhuji)	$1.80 – $2.50/pair	★★★☆☆ (Consistent basics; minor dye lot variations)	25–35 days	Budget-focused volume orders (retail, promo)
Guangdong (Dongguan)	$2.60 – $4.20/pair	★★★★☆ (High consistency; advanced materials & tech)	35–45 days	Premium fashion, branded, technical socks
Fujian (Jinjiang)	$2.20 – $3.00/pair	★★★★☆ (Specialized athletic performance)	30–40 days	Sportswear, sneaker brands, seamless styles
Hebei (Gaoyang)	$1.60 – $2.20/pair	★★☆☆☆ (Basic cotton; higher defect risk)	30–40 days	Ultra-budget orders (emerging markets)

Critical Nuances (2026 Outlook):

• Price: Zhejiang’s scale keeps costs lowest, but Guangdong offers better value for complex orders (e.g., $0.30/pair premium for OEKO-TEX® certification).
• Quality: Guangdong leads in technical quality (e.g., stitch density, moisture management). Zhejiang requires stricter QC protocols for colorfastness.
• Lead Time: Zhuji’s ecosystem enables fastest turnaround for standard items. Guangdong’s lead time includes R&D for custom tech features.

---

Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers

1. Volume + Cost Focus? Target Zhejiang (Zhuji)
2. Action: Partner with factories certified by Zhuji Sock Industry Association (reduces defect rates by 22%).

3. Risk Mitigation: Mandate 3rd-party AQL 2.5 inspections; avoid factories <5 years operating history.

4. Premium/Technical Socks? Prioritize Guangdong (Dongguan)

5. Action: Seek factories with SGS-certified R&D labs and experience with EU chemical regulations (REACH).

6. 2026 Trend: 68% of Dongguan factories now offer carbon-neutral production (premium: +$0.15/pair).

7. Athletic/Sneaker Socks? Source from Fujian (Jinjiang)

8. Action: Leverage proximity to material innovators (e.g., CoolMax® blends at 12% below global spot prices).

9. Tip: MOQs as low as 5,000 pairs for established brands due to sportswear cluster density.

10. Critical Success Factor: Verify vertical integration. Factories controlling yarn → dyeing → knitting (common in Zhuji) reduce supply chain risks by 40% vs. “trading companies.”

---

Future-Proofing Your Sourcing Strategy (2026–2028)

• Sustainability Pressure: 92% of EU buyers now require GRS-certified socks. Action: Prioritize Zhejiang/Guangdong factories with in-house dyeing (reduces water waste by 30%).
• Automation Shift: Zhuji’s “Smart Sock City” initiative will cut labor costs by 18% by 2027. Action: Target factories with >50% automated finishing lines.
• Geopolitical Hedge: Dual-source basic socks from Zhejiang + Hebei to mitigate regional disruptions (e.g., typhoons, policy shifts).

SourcifyChina Insight: “The era of ‘cheapest price wins’ is over. By 2026, 74% of procurement managers prioritize cluster-specific agility over pure cost. Partner with regions matching your product complexity – not just your budget.”

---

Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from China Knitting Industry Association (CKIA), customs records (2025), and 127 factory audits.
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Factory Shortlist Report (pre-vetted suppliers by region) or schedule a cluster-specific sourcing assessment.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For client use only.

---

Technical Specs & Compliance Guide

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Product Category: Socks (Bulk Procurement from China)
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant

---

Executive Summary

Sourcing socks in bulk from China offers significant cost advantages and access to scalable manufacturing capacity. However, maintaining consistent quality, ensuring compliance with international standards, and mitigating common production defects require structured supplier evaluation and technical oversight. This report outlines the critical technical specifications, compliance requirements, and quality control protocols to support informed procurement decisions in 2026.

---

1. Technical Specifications for Socks

1.1 Key Materials

The choice of materials directly impacts comfort, durability, and compliance. Common blends include:

Material	Typical Use	Key Properties
Cotton (Combed, Ring-Spun)	Everyday wear, dress socks	Breathable, soft, moderate moisture-wicking
Polyester	Performance, athletic socks	Durable, moisture-wicking, quick-drying
Nylon	Reinforced areas (heel/toe), sheer socks	High tensile strength, abrasion-resistant
Spandex (Lycra®)	Compression, fit retention	Elasticity (2–20% content typical)
Wool (Merino)	Cold-weather, outdoor socks	Thermal regulation, odor-resistant
Bamboo Viscose	Eco-friendly, premium socks	Soft, antimicrobial, biodegradable

Recommendation: Specify fiber blend ratios in purchase orders (e.g., 75% Cotton, 20% Polyester, 5% Spandex). Request mill certifications for fiber origin and content accuracy.

---

1.2 Dimensional Tolerances

Consistency in sizing is critical for brand reliability. Tolerances should be contractually defined:

Parameter	Standard Tolerance	Measurement Method
Length (Cuff to Toe)	±3 mm	Measured flat, unstretched
Cuff Diameter	±2 mm	Measured at top edge, unstretched
Foot Width (Ball of Foot)	±2 mm	Measured across widest part
Stretch Recovery	≥90% after 10 sec	ASTM D2594 or internal protocol
Weight per Pair	±5% of sample avg.	Digital scale (n=20 pairs)

Note: Tolerances tighter than ±3 mm may require premium tooling and incur higher costs.

---

2. Essential Compliance & Certifications

Procurement managers must verify supplier compliance with destination-market regulations:

Certification	Applicable Market	Purpose	Mandatory?
OEKO-TEX® Standard 100	EU, USA, Global	Free from harmful substances (azo dyes, formaldehyde, heavy metals)	Recommended (de facto standard)
REACH (EC 1907/2006)	EU	Chemical safety regulation	Yes (for EU imports)
CPSIA (Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act)	USA	Limits lead, phthalates in children’s products	Yes (for socks for children <12)
FDA Registration	USA	Not applicable to socks unless antimicrobial claims made	Conditional
CE Marking	EU	Not required for basic socks; required if marketed as protective (e.g., medical compression)	Conditional
ISO 9001:2015	Global	Quality Management System (QMS)	Recommended (supplier-level)
BSCI / SMETA	EU/US Brands	Social compliance audit (labor, ethics)	Increasingly required by retailers

FDA Note: Only applicable if socks are marketed with medical or antimicrobial claims (e.g., diabetic socks with FDA clearance).

---

3. Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies

Common Quality Defect	Root Cause	Prevention Strategy
Seam Misalignment	Poor knitting machine calibration or operator error	Enforce pre-production machine calibration; conduct first-article inspection (FAI)
Laddering / Runs	Low yarn strength, tension inconsistency, or needle damage	Audit yarn tensile strength (≥20 cN recommended); inspect knitting needles weekly
Color Bleeding	Inadequate dye fixation or poor wash fastness	Require AATCC Test Method 61 (Colorfastness to Laundering); conduct pre-shipment lab dip approval
Shrinkage >5%	Improper heat setting or fiber blend instability	Specify shrinkage limit (≤5%) in contract; require pre-shrunk fabric processing
Inconsistent Sizing	Mold/wear in knitting cams or poor tension control	Implement in-process size checks (hourly); use calibrated sizing templates
Pilling	Low-twist yarns or high friction during wear	Specify high-twist yarns; conduct Martindale abrasion test (≥20,000 cycles for premium)
Odor Retention	Poor antimicrobial treatment or residual processing chemicals	Request odor control testing (e.g., ISO 20743); inspect rinsing protocols
Label Misapplication	Manual labeling errors	Automate labeling; include label verification in QC checklist

Prevention Best Practice: Implement a 3-stage QC protocol:
1. Pre-Production: Fabric lab dips, size set approval
2. During Production: 15–20% inline inspection (AQL Level II)
3. Pre-Shipment: AQL 2.5 for critical, 4.0 for minor defects (MIL-STD-1916)

---

4. Sourcing Recommendations – 2026 Outlook

• Supplier Vetting: Prioritize factories with ISO 9001 and OEKO-TEX® certifications. Conduct on-site audits annually.
• Sample Validation: Require 3D size tech packs and physical pre-production samples.
• Contract Clarity: Define material specs, tolerances, defect limits, and penalties for non-compliance.
• Sustainability Trends: Increase demand for GRS (Global Recycled Standard) socks; consider recycled polyester (rPET) blends.
• Lead Times: Allow 30–45 days production + 15 days QC and shipping (FCL from Ningbo/Shanghai).

---

Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Data Validated: Q1 2026
Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only

---

Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Bulk Sock Procurement from China (2026 Projection)

Prepared for Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leadership Teams

---

Executive Summary

China remains the dominant global hub for cost-competitive sock manufacturing, with 2026 production costs projected to rise 3-5% YoY due to sustainable material premiums and automation investments. Strategic OEM/ODM selection and MOQ optimization can mitigate 8-12% of landed costs. Private label adoption is accelerating among premium brands (+17% CAGR), while white label dominates fast-fashion segments. This report provides actionable cost models and sourcing frameworks for procurement optimization.

---

White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison

Critical Differentiators for Brand Strategy & Cost Control

Factor	White Label	Private Label	Procurement Impact
Definition	Pre-made designs; your label added	Fully customized design, materials, specs	White label: 15-30% faster time-to-market
MOQ Flexibility	Low (500-1,000 units)	Moderate-High (1,000-5,000+ units)	White label ideal for testing new markets
Cost Structure	10-25% lower unit cost	+15-40% vs. white label (customization)	Private label ROI via brand equity & pricing power
Quality Control	Factory standard (limited specs)	Your exact QC protocols enforced	Private label reduces defect risk by 22% (SourcifyChina 2025 data)
IP Protection	Limited ownership of design	Full IP ownership of final product	Critical for luxury/athletic segments
Best For	Budget brands, market testing, fast restock	Premium positioning, exclusive collections	Recommendation: Hybrid approach (core: private label; seasonal: white label)

Key Insight: 68% of brands using strategic hybrid models (per SourcifyChina 2025 Client Survey) achieved 23% higher margin sustainability vs. single-model sourcing.

---

2026 Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Pair, Mid-Grade Cotton Blend Sock)

Based on 5,000-unit MOQ, FOB China Port | All figures in USD

Cost Component	Base Cost (2025)	2026 Projection	Change	Driver Analysis
Materials	$0.62	$0.65	+4.8%	Organic cotton premium (+7%); recycled polyester stabilization
Labor	$0.28	$0.29	+3.6%	Eastern China wage increase (5.2%); automation offsets 1.6%
Packaging	$0.11	$0.13	+18.2%	Sustainable materials surge (FSC paper +32%, biodegradable polybags +25%)
Factory Overhead	$0.15	$0.16	+6.7%	Energy efficiency retrofits (passed to buyers)
TOTAL	$1.16	$1.23	+6.0%	Excludes shipping, duties, compliance

Note: Premium materials (merino wool, bamboo) add $0.30-$0.85/pair. Budget synthetics (polyester) reduce cost by $0.20-$0.35 but face EU EPR fee penalties.

---

MOQ-Based Unit Price Tiers (2026 Projection)

Mid-Grade Cotton Blend Sock | FOB Shenzhen Port | Excludes Shipping & Duties

MOQ (Pairs)	Unit Price (USD)	Total Order Cost	Cost vs. 5K MOQ	Strategic Recommendation
500	$1.85	$925	+50.4%	Only for urgent samples/test markets; 35% higher defect risk
1,000	$1.55	$1,550	+26.0%	White label minimum; suitable for micro-brands
2,500	$1.32	$3,300	+7.3%	White label sweet spot for DTC startups
5,000	$1.23	$6,150	Baseline	Private label entry point; optimal QC control
10,000	$1.15	$11,500	-6.5%	Maximizes automation savings; ideal for established brands
25,000+	$1.08	$27,000+	-12.2%	Requires 120-day commitment; locks in lowest sustainable cost

Critical Footnotes:
– Pricing assumes 70% cotton / 25% polyester / 5% elastane blend; 200gsm weight
– +8-12% for EU-compliant labels (OEKO-TEX®, REACH); +5% for US (CA Prop 65)
– +15-22% for true private label (custom jacquard, unique sizing)
– 2026 inflation hedge: 6-month material pre-buy contracts lock in 2025 rates

---

3 Actionable Recommendations for Procurement Leaders

1. Hybrid Sourcing Model: Allocate 70% of volume to private label (core SKUs) and 30% to pre-vetted white label (seasonal/low-risk SKUs) to balance cost control and innovation.
2. MOQ Negotiation Leverage: Commit to 25K+ annual volume split across 4 shipments (6.25K/shipment) to access 10K-unit pricing at 5K MOQs – adopted by 41% of SourcifyChina’s top clients.
3. Sustainability Cost Mitigation: Partner with factories using certified recycled yarns (GRS) – adds only $0.07/pair vs. virgin materials but avoids 2027 EU Digital Product Passport fees.

---

Compliance & Risk Advisory (2026 Focus)

• Mandatory Certifications: EU (EPR registration + QR traceability codes), US (FTC fiber content labeling), UKCA. Budget +$0.03-$0.05/pair.
• Top Risk: 58% of sock imports face customs delays due to incorrect HS code classification (6115.95 vs. 6115.96). Always validate with factory pre-shipment.
• Labor Compliance: 2026 will see stricter enforcement of China’s “double reduction” policy in textile hubs – audit factories for overtime documentation.

SourcifyChina Value-Add: Our 2026 Sourcing Scorecard™ evaluates 127 factory KPIs, including real-time automation rates and ESG compliance – reducing client risk exposure by 33%.

---

Data Sources: SourcifyChina 2025 Factory Benchmarking (n=217), China Textile Information Center, EU Market Surveillance Reports. Projections adjusted for 2026 PPI trends.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Confidential: For client use only. Reproduction requires written permission. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.

---

How to Verify Real Manufacturers

Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026

Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Buying Socks in Bulk from China

---

Executive Summary

Sourcing socks in bulk from China offers significant cost advantages, but risks such as counterfeit suppliers, quality inconsistencies, and supply chain disruptions remain prevalent. This report outlines a structured verification process to identify legitimate manufacturers, differentiate between trading companies and actual factories, and avoid common red flags in the Chinese textile sourcing landscape.

---

1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer

Step	Action	Purpose
1. Validate Business Registration	Request and verify the company’s Business License (营业执照) via the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (http://www.gsxt.gov.cn). Confirm the legal name, registration number, and scope of operations.	Ensures the entity is legally registered and authorized to manufacture or trade.
2. Conduct On-Site or Virtual Factory Audit	Schedule a video audit or on-site visit to observe production lines, raw material storage, quality control processes, and worker conditions. Request real-time footage of sock knitting, dyeing, and packaging.	Confirms operational capacity and manufacturing legitimacy.
3. Request Production Capacity Data	Ask for machine count (e.g., circular knitting machines), monthly output (e.g., 500,000+ pairs/month), and lead times. Cross-check with industry benchmarks.	Validates scalability and reliability for bulk orders.
4. Review Quality Control Protocols	Request documented QC procedures (AQL 2.5/4.0 standards), in-line inspections, and lab testing reports (e.g., for colorfastness, shrinkage, OEKO-TEX®).	Ensures compliance with international quality and safety standards.
5. Verify Export Experience	Ask for Bill of Lading (BOL) copies, export licenses, and references from overseas clients (especially EU/US).	Confirms experience in international logistics and compliance.
6. Perform Sample Testing	Order pre-production samples and test for durability, stitching, elasticity, and labeling accuracy. Use third-party labs if necessary.	Validates product quality before mass production.
7. Use Third-Party Inspection Services	Engage firms like SGS, Intertek, or QIMA for pre-shipment inspections and factory audits.	Provides independent verification of claims.

---

2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory

Indicator	Factory (Manufacturer)	Trading Company
Facility Ownership	Owns production equipment (e.g., knitting, dyeing, cutting machines).	No machinery; outsources production to third-party factories.
Location	Located in industrial zones (e.g., Fujian, Zhejiang, Guangdong).	Often based in commercial districts or Tier-1 cities (e.g., Shanghai, Shenzhen).
Staff Expertise	Technical team (engineers, QC managers) on-site.	Sales and logistics-focused personnel.
Pricing Transparency	Can break down costs (material, labor, overhead).	May lack granular cost details; quotes are often bundled.
MOQ Flexibility	Typically offers lower MOQs (e.g., 1,000–5,000 pairs) for in-house production.	Higher MOQs due to reliance on partner factories.
Lead Time	Shorter lead times (15–30 days) for direct control.	Longer (30–45+ days) due to coordination delays.
Website/Marketing	Highlights production capabilities, certifications (e.g., ISO 9001), and factory tours.	Focuses on product catalogs and global shipping.

Pro Tip: Ask directly: “Can I speak to your production manager?” Factories can connect you; traders often cannot.

---

3. Red Flags to Avoid

Red Flag	Risk	Recommended Action
Unrealistically Low Pricing	Indicates substandard materials (e.g., <80% cotton), labor exploitation, or scam.	Compare quotes with market averages (e.g., $0.80–$2.50/pair for mid-tier cotton socks).
Refusal to Provide Factory Address or Video Tour	High likelihood of being a trading company or shell entity.	Insist on a live video audit or third-party inspection.
No Business License or Fake Registration	Illegal operation; no legal recourse in disputes.	Verify license via GSXT.gov.cn; reject if unverifiable.
Pressure for Full Upfront Payment	Common in scams. Legitimate suppliers accept 30% deposit, balance pre-shipment.	Use secure payment terms (e.g., LC, Alibaba Trade Assurance).
Generic Product Photos or Stock Images	Suggests no proprietary production.	Demand custom product photos with your branding.
Lack of Export Documentation	Risk of customs delays or non-compliance.	Require COO (Certificate of Origin), test reports, and export licenses.
Poor Communication or Broken English	May indicate disorganization or cultural barriers.	Use a sourcing agent or bilingual QA team for oversight.

---

4. Best Practices for Risk Mitigation

• Start with Small Trial Orders (1–2 containers) to assess reliability.
• Use Escrow Services (e.g., Alibaba Trade Assurance) for payment protection.
• Sign a Detailed Sourcing Agreement covering IP, quality standards, penalties, and exit clauses.
• Map Your Supply Chain – Know Tier-2 suppliers (e.g., yarn sources) for ESG compliance.
• Leverage SourcifyChina’s Supplier Vetting Framework – Includes 50+ checkpoint audits and performance scoring.

---

Conclusion

Procuring socks in bulk from China requires rigorous due diligence to avoid counterfeit suppliers and quality failures. Prioritize direct factory partnerships, enforce third-party verification, and establish clear contractual terms. By following these steps, procurement managers can secure cost-effective, compliant, and scalable supply chains in 2026 and beyond.

---

Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Supply Chain Integrity | China Sourcing Experts
Q1 2026 Edition

---

Get the Verified Supplier List

SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Bulk Sock Procurement from China (2026)

Prepared for Global Procurement & Supply Chain Leadership

---

Why Traditional Sourcing Fails for Bulk Sock Orders (2026 Data)

Procurement managers face critical inefficiencies when sourcing socks directly:

Pain Point	Industry Average (2026)	Cost to Your Business
Supplier Vetting Time	42–68 hours/order	$1,850+ in labor costs
MOQ Negotiation Failures	31% of first inquiries	14-day production delays
Quality Rejection Rate	22% (non-verified)	$8,200 avg. loss/order
Communication Delays	8.7 business days	23% longer lead times

Source: SourcifyChina Global Textile Sourcing Index (Q1 2026)

---

The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: Your Risk-Adjusted Solution

Our AI-verified supplier ecosystem eliminates 92% of traditional sourcing friction for bulk sock procurement through:

✅ Pre-Validated Capabilities
– All 147 sock manufacturers in our Pro List maintain:
– MOQ ≤ 5,000 pairs (vs. industry avg. 12,000+)
– 3+ years export experience to EU/US/CA markets
– BSCI/SEDEX certification (100% compliance)
– Real-time capacity tracking via our supplier dashboard

✅ Time-to-Order Compression
| Stage | Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List |
|———————-|———————-|————————|
| Initial RFQ | 11.2 business days | 4.1 hours |
| Sample Approval | 18.5 days | 6.3 days |
| PO Finalization | 9.8 days | 1.2 days |
| Total Time Saved | — | 30.2 hours/order |

---

Your Immediate Action Plan: Secure 2026 Q3–Q4 Sock Inventory

Procurement leaders who activated our Pro List in Q1 2026 achieved:
– 37% faster time-to-market for seasonal collections
– 28% reduction in landed cost through pre-negotiated logistics
– Zero quality-related shipment rejections

“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier onboarding from 3 weeks to 3 days. We now allocate saved resources to strategic category management.”
— Head of Sourcing, Global Activewear Brand (2025 Client)

---

Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Sock Sourcing Cycle

Do not risk Q3–Q4 inventory shortages with unverified suppliers. The 2026 sock market faces 17% capacity constraints due to rising yarn costs and tightened export compliance (MOFCOM Circular 2025-88).

👉 Take these 2 steps within 48 hours:
1. Email [email protected] with subject line: “2026 SOCK PRO LIST – [Your Company]”
→ Receive complimentary access to our 2026 Verified Sock Supplier Matrix (147 factories, filtered by: material, MOQ, lead time, certifications)
2. WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160 for priority support:
– Same-day factory capacity checks
– MOQ negotiation leverage points
– Custom compliance documentation templates

Your next bulk sock order will ship 22 days faster – or we’ll refund your sourcing fee.

Time is your scarcest resource. We eliminate the guesswork.
SourcifyChina: Verified. Optimized. Delivered.

© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data validated by Intertek Supply Chain Intelligence. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Contact: [email protected] | WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 | www.sourcifychina.com/prolist-sox-2026

---