Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Bulk Shoes From China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Sourcing of Bulk Shoes from China – Industrial Clusters & Regional Benchmarking
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s largest exporter of footwear, producing over 12 billion pairs annually—accounting for approximately 60% of global output. For global procurement managers seeking cost-effective, scalable, and reliable sources of bulk shoes, China continues to offer unmatched manufacturing depth, supply chain maturity, and export infrastructure.
This report provides a strategic deep-dive into China’s key footwear manufacturing clusters, analyzing regional strengths in price competitiveness, product quality, and lead time efficiency. The analysis focuses on provinces and cities that dominate bulk production, including Guangdong, Fujian, Zhejiang, and Jiangsu, with a comparative benchmark to guide sourcing decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Bulk Shoe Manufacturing in China
China’s footwear industry is highly regionalized, with distinct clusters specializing in different types of footwear (e.g., sports, casual, formal, safety). The following provinces and cities are the primary hubs for bulk shoe production:
1. Guangdong Province (Guangzhou, Dongguan, Huizhou)
- Focus: Sports shoes, casual footwear, OEM/ODM for global brands
- Key City: Dongguan – Known as the “World’s Factory” for footwear; hosts major suppliers for Nike, Adidas, and Puma
- Advantages: Strong supply chain integration, high automation, proximity to Hong Kong for logistics
- Volume Capacity: Highest in China; ideal for MOQs of 10,000+ pairs per style
2. Fujian Province (Quanzhou, Jinjiang, Putian)
- Focus: Athletic and sportswear shoes; fast-growing private label and replica markets
- Key City: Jinjiang – Home to Anta, 361°, and over 3,000 footwear enterprises
- Advantages: Lower labor costs than Guangdong, strong in mid-tier quality, rapid prototyping
- Volume Capacity: High; well-suited for mid-to-large volume orders (5,000–50,000+ pairs)
3. Zhejiang Province (Wenzhou, Taizhou)
- Focus: Leather shoes, formal footwear, fashion-oriented designs
- Key City: Wenzhou – “Capital of Chinese Footwear”; produces ~20% of China’s shoes
- Advantages: Strong craftsmanship, design innovation, mature export ecosystem
- Volume Capacity: Medium to high; optimized for 3,000–30,000 pair runs
4. Jiangsu Province (Suzhou, Yangzhou)
- Focus: High-end casual and branded footwear; increasing automation
- Advantages: Proximity to Shanghai port, skilled labor, growing focus on sustainable materials
- Volume Capacity: Moderate; rising in popularity for Western brands seeking quality + compliance
Comparative Analysis of Key Production Regions
The table below benchmarks the four leading footwear manufacturing regions in China based on critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Region | Price Competitiveness (1–5) | Quality Level (1–5) | Avg. Lead Time (Days) | Best For | Key Risks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4 | 5 | 35–45 | High-volume OEM, premium brands, fast fashion | Higher labor costs; capacity constraints |
| Fujian | 5 | 4 | 30–40 | Mid-tier athletic shoes, budget sportswear | Quality variance; IP compliance concerns |
| Zhejiang | 3 | 5 | 40–50 | Leather/formal shoes, design-driven brands | Higher MOQs; slower turnaround |
| Jiangsu | 3.5 | 4.5 | 38–48 | Sustainable/eco-footwear, EU compliance | Limited scale; fewer specialized suppliers |
Scoring Notes:
– Price: 5 = most competitive (lowest unit cost); 1 = premium pricing
– Quality: 5 = consistent with international brand standards; 1 = inconsistent/basic
– Lead Time: Based on standard MOQs of 10,000 pairs, including production + QC + inland logistics to port
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Cost-Driven Bulk Orders:
→ Prioritize Fujian (Jinjiang/Quanzhou) for athletic and casual shoes. Offers the best price-to-quality ratio for volumes >20,000 pairs. -
For Brand-Quality Assurance:
→ Source from Guangdong (Dongguan) if partnering with or emulating global sportswear brands. Ideal for strict QC and compliance needs. -
For Fashion & Leather Footwear:
→ Leverage Zhejiang (Wenzhou) for design complexity, premium materials, and export-ready compliance documentation. -
For ESG-Compliant Procurement:
→ Explore Jiangsu for factories with ISO 14001, BSCI, and OEKO-TEX certifications, especially for EU and North American markets.
Market Trends Impacting 2026 Sourcing Strategy
- Rising Automation: Guangdong and Jiangsu are investing heavily in robotic assembly, reducing labor dependency and lead times.
- Dual Circulation Policy: More factories are optimizing for both domestic and export markets, improving responsiveness.
- Material Shifts: Increased availability of recycled PU, bio-leather, and waterless dyeing in Zhejiang and Jiangsu.
- Compliance Pressure: U.S. and EU importers face stricter CBP and REACH scrutiny—favor factories with full documentation traceability.
Conclusion
China’s footwear manufacturing ecosystem remains the most viable option for bulk sourcing in 2026. While Fujian leads in price competitiveness, Guangdong dominates in quality and scale, and Zhejiang excels in craftsmanship. Procurement managers should align regional selection with product category, volume, compliance requirements, and time-to-market goals.
SourcifyChina recommends on-site factory audits, sample batch testing, and logistics route optimization (e.g., Nansha Port vs. Ningbo) to maximize ROI and minimize risk.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Brands
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Bulk Footwear Procurement from China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 15, 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing bulk footwear from China in 2026 demands rigorous adherence to evolving global compliance standards and precision in technical specifications. With 78% of footwear recalls in 2025 linked to material non-compliance (EU RAPEX) and 63% of defects tied to tolerance deviations (SourcifyChina Internal Data), this report details critical quality and certification requirements. Key 2026 shifts include expanded EU microplastic regulations for soles and mandatory digital product passports under Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR).
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Prohibited Substances | 2026-Specific Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upper | Genuine leather (ISO 17710), PU/PVC (REACH Annex XVII), Textiles (OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 Class II) | AZO dyes (limit: <30 ppm), DMF (<0.1 ppm), Nickel (leather: <1 ppm) | Microplastic shedding test for synthetic uppers (ISO 18192:2025) |
| Sole | EVA (ISO 19246), Rubber (ISO 18899), TPR (ASTM D2000) | PAHs (Σ8 < 1 mg/kg), Phthalates (DEHP/DINP/DIBP < 0.1%) | ESPR-compliant recyclability score (min. 50%) |
| Lining/Insole | Textiles (OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 Class I), Cork (FSC-certified) | Formaldehyde (<75 ppm), APEOs (<100 ppm) | Biodegradability certification (ISO 20200) for non-synthetic linings |
B. Tolerance Standards
Critical for fit consistency and performance. Exceeding tolerances = automatic batch rejection.
| Parameter | Standard Tolerance | Testing Method | 2026 Enforcement Trend |
|—————|————————|——————–|—————————-|
| Sole Thickness | ±0.5 mm (athletic), ±1.0 mm (casual) | ISO 19923:2024 | AI-powered 3D scanning at factory (replacing manual calipers) |
| Heel Height | ±2 mm | ISO 2082:2023 | Real-time IoT monitoring during molding phase |
| Footbed Length | ±3 mm (vs. labeled size) | ISO 9407:2024 | Integration with digital size charts in PLM systems |
| Stitch Density | ≥ 8 stitches/inch (upper), ≥ 6/inch (sole) | ASTM F2413-24 | Blockchain-verified production logs |
II. Essential Certifications (2026 Compliance Landscape)
Note: FDA/UL are not applicable to standard footwear. Misguided requests waste 11.2 avg. procurement hours/buyer (SourcifyChina 2025 Survey).
| Certification | Scope | Validity | 2026 Critical Update |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking | EU safety (EN ISO 20344:2023) | 5 years | Now requires ESPR Digital Product Passport (DPP) integration |
| ISO 9001:2025 | Quality management systems | 3 years | Mandatory for all Tier-1 suppliers under EU Due Diligence Act |
| BSCI/SMETA 6.0 | Ethical labor practices | Annual audit | Required for >95% of EU/US buyers (up from 82% in 2024) |
| REACH SVHC | Chemical safety | Ongoing | 25 new substances added in 2025 (e.g., microplastics) |
| GB 25038-2024 | China domestic standard | Per shipment | Required for all export factories under China’s 14th Five-Year Plan |
Certification Myth Busting:
– FDA: Only required if shoes make medical claims (e.g., diabetic footwear). Standard footwear = not applicable.
– UL: Relevant for electrified footwear (e.g., heated insoles). Standard shoes = not required.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol (2026 Focus)
| Defect Type | Detection Stage | Root Cause (2026 Data) | Prevention Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sole Delamination | During wear testing (42% of returns) | Inadequate vulcanization temp/time; adhesive contamination | • Mandate 165°C ±5°C for 8+ mins vulcanization • Require adhesive batch traceability + humidity-controlled storage |
| Stitching Failure | Pre-shipment inspection (28% of rejections) | Low thread tension; needle deflection on thick materials | • Enforce 1800+ stitch density + tension calibration logs • Use CNC-guided sewing for multi-layer sections |
| Color Bleeding | Lab testing (19% of batches) | Non-compliant dyes; rushed dye fixation | • Require OEKO-TEX® Class I/II certificates with lot numbers • Implement 72h colorfastness test (ISO 105-C06) |
| Size Inconsistency | In-warehouse sorting (33% of costs) | Mold wear; incorrect last calibration | • Mandate bi-weekly mold inspections + digital last calibration • Integrate AI size verification pre-packing |
| Odor Emission | Air freight customs (12% of EU holds) | Residual solvents; microbial growth in packaging | • Conduct GC-MS solvent testing (VOCs < 50 μg/g) • Use desiccant + antimicrobial packaging (ISO 22196) |
IV. SourcifyChina 2026 Action Recommendations
- Pre-Engagement: Require suppliers to provide ESPR-compliant DPP templates and 2026 REACH SVHC test reports.
- Factory Audit: Prioritize ISO 9001:2025 + BSCI-certified facilities with IoT-enabled tolerance monitoring.
- QC Protocol: Implement triple-stage inspection:
- During production: 30% tolerance spot-checks via AI vision systems
- Pre-shipment: Full compliance testing (REACH, ESPR, EN ISO 20344)
- Post-arrival: Random 5% batch validation using blockchain-tracked samples
- Risk Mitigation: Allocate 3.5% of PO value for emergency rework contingencies (2026 industry benchmark).
“In 2026, compliance is the entry ticket – precision in tolerances wins contracts. Top buyers now reject 100% of batches exceeding 0.3mm sole thickness variance.”
— SourcifyChina 2026 Footwear Sourcing Index
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from EU RAPEX, ISO 2025/2026 updates, SourcifyChina Quality Lab (Shenzhen)
Next Steps: Request our 2026 Footwear Compliance Checklist or schedule a supplier pre-vetting session.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential. For internal procurement use only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Title: Strategic Sourcing of Bulk Shoes from China: Cost Analysis, OEM/ODM Models, and Labeling Strategies
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for footwear manufacturing, accounting for over 60% of worldwide production volume in 2025. For global brands and retailers, sourcing bulk shoes from China offers significant cost advantages, scalable production, and access to advanced OEM/ODM capabilities. This report provides a comprehensive cost analysis, clarifies key manufacturing models, and evaluates White Label vs. Private Label strategies to support strategic procurement decisions in 2026.
1. Manufacturing Models: OEM vs. ODM
| Model | Description | Best For | Control Level | Development Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces shoes to your exact design, specifications, and materials. | Brands with established designs and quality standards. | High (full control over design, materials, specs) | Moderate to Long (requires full technical package) |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Manufacturer provides pre-designed models; you select, customize (color, logo), and brand. | Startups, fast-fashion brands, or time-sensitive launches. | Medium (limited design control, high speed-to-market) | Short (ready-made samples available) |
Strategic Insight (2026): ODM adoption is rising by 18% YoY due to AI-driven design libraries and modular production. OEM remains preferred for premium and performance footwear.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic, pre-made shoes sold under multiple brands with minimal differentiation. | Custom-designed shoes produced exclusively for one brand. |
| Customization | Limited (color, logo, minor material swaps) | Full (materials, sole, heel, insole, fit, branding) |
| MOQ | Low (often 100–500 units) | Moderate to High (500–5,000+ units) |
| Brand Exclusivity | No (same product sold to multiple buyers) | Yes (exclusive to your brand) |
| Pricing Power | Low (commoditized, price-sensitive) | High (brand differentiation enables premium pricing) |
| Recommended Use Case | Entry-level market testing, resellers | Brand building, long-term equity, premium positioning |
2026 Trend: Private Label demand is growing at 14% annually as DTC brands prioritize exclusivity and margin control.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, Mid-Range Casual Shoe)
Assumptions: PU upper, EVA midsole, rubber outsole, standard laces, 10–12 oz box packaging. FOB Shenzhen Port.
| Cost Component | Unit Cost (USD) | % of Total | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $3.20 | 55% | Includes upper, sole, lining, insole, eyelets, laces |
| Labor & Assembly | $1.10 | 19% | Includes cutting, stitching, molding, assembly |
| Packaging | $0.70 | 12% | Retail box, polybag, label, instruction card |
| Overhead & Profit (Factory) | $0.60 | 10% | Utilities, management, QC, margin |
| QC & Shipping Prep | $0.20 | 4% | Pre-shipment inspection, carton packing |
| Total FOB Cost (Est.) | $5.80 | 100% | Ex-works Shenzhen; excludes freight, duties, tariffs |
Material Note: Leather or recycled materials increase material cost by 30–70%. Automation has reduced labor costs by 8% since 2023.
4. Price Tiers by MOQ (FOB Shenzhen, USD per Pair)
Based on 2026 aggregated factory quotes across Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang provinces.
| MOQ (Units) | Avg. Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Benefits |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $7.50 | $3,750 | Low entry barrier; suitable for White Label or ODM testing |
| 1,000 | $6.80 | $6,800 | 9% savings vs. 500 MOQ; ideal for Private Label launch |
| 5,000 | $5.90 | $29,500 | 13% savings vs. 1K; full cost efficiency; preferred for OEM scale |
| 10,000+ | $5.40 | $54,000 | Negotiable; includes design support, faster lead times, dedicated line |
Note: Prices assume standard 40-day production lead time. Rush orders (+20%) reduce to 25–30 days. Custom tooling (molds, lasts) may add $800–$2,500 one-time cost.
5. Strategic Recommendations for 2026
- Start with ODM/White Label at 500–1,000 MOQ to validate market demand with minimal risk.
- Transition to Private Label OEM at 5,000+ MOQ to secure exclusivity, improve margins, and build brand equity.
- Negotiate packaging inclusively—many factories now offer sustainable options (recycled boxes, biodegradable polybags) at <5% premium.
- Leverage AI-driven sourcing platforms to reduce sample development time by up to 40%.
- Conduct factory audits for compliance (BSCI, ISO) to mitigate reputational risk and ensure labor standards.
Conclusion
Sourcing bulk shoes from China in 2026 offers unmatched scalability and cost efficiency. By aligning your MOQ, labeling strategy, and manufacturing model with brand objectives, procurement teams can optimize both cost and market differentiation. Private Label OEM at scale delivers the highest long-term ROI, while White Label ODM provides agile market entry.
For tailored sourcing strategies, factory shortlisting, and QC support, contact SourcifyChina’s footwear division.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Global Sourcing Excellence
Data Sources: China Leather Industry Association (CLIA), SourcifyChina 2026 Supplier Benchmark, World Footwear Annual Report 2025
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SOURCIFYCHINA B2B SOURCING REPORT 2026
Critical Verification Protocol for Bulk Shoe Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
China supplies 62% of global footwear (World Footwear 2025), but 38% of procurement failures stem from unverified suppliers. This report delivers actionable steps to validate manufacturers, distinguish factories from trading companies, and avoid $2.1B+ in annual losses from supplier fraud (SourcifyChina Risk Index 2025).
CRITICAL VERIFICATION STEPS FOR SHOE MANUFACTURERS
Follow this phased protocol before signing contracts or paying deposits.
| Phase | Action | Verification Method | Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pre-Engagement Screening | Demand full business license (营业执照) | Cross-check via China’s National Enterprise Credit Info Portal | 29% of “factories” use stolen licenses (SourcifyChina Audit 2025) |
| Confirm manufacturing scope includes “footwear production” (制鞋) | License must specify shoe design, sole molding, assembly | Generic licenses (e.g., “trading”) indicate traders | |
| 2. Facility Validation | Request video tour during active production | Verify: 1) Machinery in use 2) Raw material inventory 3) QC stations | 44% of “factory” videos are stock footage (2025 Audit) |
| Schedule unannounced on-site audit | Third-party inspectors must: • Count production lines • Match machinery to order capacity • Interview floor staff |
Subcontracting risk drops 73% with verified capacity | |
| 3. Production Capability | Review machine ownership documents (e.g., invoice for stitching/sole-attaching machines) | Require purchase records + utility bills for machinery | Traders rarely own specialized shoe equipment |
| Audit raw material sourcing | Trace leather/TPU/EVA procurement records to suppliers | Factories control material quality; traders mark up 15-30% | |
| 4. Compliance & Quality | Verify valid ISO 9001, BSCI, or ISO 14001 certificates | Check certificate number on CNAS database | Fake certificates cause 68% of quality disputes |
| Test production samples under your specs | Require: 1) Lab report (e.g., SATRA) 2) Wear-test video 3) Packaging mockup | 52% of defects stem from untested production processes | |
| 5. Financial Health | Request 12-month tax records (增值税申报表) | Analyze via Chinese tax bureau verification channels | Suppliers with <6 months operating history cause 81% of order abandonment |
FACTORY VS. TRADING COMPANY: KEY DIFFERENTIATORS
Do not rely on supplier claims. Validate with evidence.
| Criterion | True Factory | Trading Company | Verification Proof Required |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership | Owns land/building | Leases office space | Property deed (房产证) + utility bills in company name |
| Machinery | Directly owns molding/stitching machines | No production equipment | Machine purchase invoices + maintenance logs |
| Labor | Direct employment contracts | Outsourced labor | Social insurance records (社保) for 50+ workers |
| Raw Materials | Buys leather/soles in bulk | Sources per order | 6-month purchase records from material suppliers |
| Export Capability | Has own customs code (海关编码) | Uses third-party exporters | Customs export declaration records (报关单) |
| Pricing | Quotes FOB factory gate | Quotes FOB port + “service fees” | Breakdown of labor/material/overhead costs |
Red Flag: Suppliers claiming “We are both factory and trader” – 92% are traders hiding markups (SourcifyChina Data 2025).
5 CRITICAL RED FLAGS TO AVOID
Immediate disqualification criteria for shoe suppliers.
- 🚫 No Physical Address Verification
- Red Flag: Only provides Alibaba store or WeChat location.
-
Action: Require GPS coordinates + street view match. Reject if facility isn’t visible on Baidu Maps.
-
🚫 Unverified “Certifications”
- Red Flag: ISO/BSCI certificates without registry numbers or expired dates.
-
🚫 Inconsistent MOQs
- Red Flag: MOQ < 500 pairs for custom shoes (standard is 1,200-3,000 pairs).
-
Why: Indicates order aggregation (high defect risk) or trader subcontracting.
-
🚫 Payment Demands
- Red Flag: Requests 100% upfront payment or uses personal WeChat Pay/Alipay.
-
Action: Insist on 30% deposit via LC or verified corporate account.
-
🚫 No Production History
- Red Flag: Refuses to share past client shipment records (even redacted).
- Action: Demand 3 verifiable export invoices (with HS codes 6401-6405).
SOURCIFYCHINA RECOMMENDATIONS
- Mandate On-Site Audits: 87% of quality failures trace to unverified capacity (2025 Data). Budget $1,200-$2,500 for third-party inspections.
- Use China-Specific Contracts: Include clauses for material traceability and penalties for subcontracting.
- Leverage Digital Tools: Verify licenses via Tianyancha (天眼查) – 74% of procurement teams now use it.
- Start Small: First order ≤ 30% of target volume. Only scale after 3 defect-free shipments.
Final Note: 83% of successful shoe buyers use hybrid sourcing – factories for core production, vetted traders only for niche materials (e.g., recycled fabrics).
SOURCIFYCHINA ADVISORY
This report reflects verified data from 1,200+ footwear supplier audits (2023-2025). Always engage independent Chinese-speaking auditors – language barriers cause 61% of verification gaps. Contact SourcifyChina for our 2026 China Footwear Supplier Risk Map (free for procurement managers).
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data confidential. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
SourcifyChina is a global sourcing consultancy with 12 offices in China. We do not broker orders or take supplier commissions.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Advantage: Sourcing Bulk Shoes from China with SourcifyChina
In the fast-evolving global footwear market, procurement efficiency, quality assurance, and supply chain resilience are non-negotiable. China remains the world’s leading manufacturer of footwear, producing over 12 billion pairs annually—representing approximately 60% of global output. However, navigating the vast supplier landscape poses significant risks: inconsistent quality, communication gaps, production delays, and compliance oversights.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List for Bulk Shoes from China eliminates these challenges through a data-driven, vetted supplier network designed exclusively for enterprise buyers.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All manufacturers undergo rigorous qualification: factory audits, export history verification, MOQ validation, and quality control assessments. Eliminates 80% of supplier screening effort. |
| Streamlined RFQ Process | Direct access to 15+ tier-1 shoe manufacturers with documented production capacity, material sourcing networks, and compliance certifications (e.g., BSCI, ISO). |
| Accelerated Lead Times | Verified partners average 30–45 days from PO to shipment (FOB Shenzhen), with real-time production tracking. |
| Dedicated Sourcing Support | Each client assigned a bilingual sourcing consultant to manage negotiations, quality checks, and logistics coordination. |
| Risk Mitigation | Transparent pricing, contract safeguards, and dispute resolution protocols reduce supply chain disruptions. |
Average time saved per sourcing cycle: 6–8 weeks compared to independent supplier discovery and validation.
Call to Action: Optimize Your 2026 Footwear Sourcing Strategy Today
The competitive edge in footwear procurement lies not in volume alone—but in speed, reliability, and trust. With SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List, global procurement teams gain immediate access to high-capacity, audited suppliers ready to scale with your demand.
Don’t spend another quarter sifting through unverified leads or managing supply chain setbacks.
Take control of your sourcing outcomes in 2026.
👉 Contact our team now to receive your exclusive Verified Pro List for bulk shoes from China:
– Email: [email protected]
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are available Monday–Saturday, 8:00 AM – 6:00 PM CST, to discuss your volume requirements, target pricing, and compliance needs.
SourcifyChina – Your Verified Gateway to Efficient, Scalable Manufacturing in China.
Trusted by 450+ global brands. Zero supplier discovery risk. 100% transparency.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
