Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Brand Name Sunglasses Wholesale China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Brand Name Sunglasses Wholesale from China (2026 Market Analysis)
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers | Date: Q1 2026 | Confidential: SourcifyChina Client Use Only
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for sunglasses manufacturing, producing >80% of the world’s volume. However, sourcing authentic “brand name” sunglasses wholesale directly from China is legally restricted and high-risk due to intellectual property (IP) laws. Reputable manufacturers operate under OEM/ODM models for private labels or licensed production. This report focuses on high-fidelity replica manufacturing clusters (commonly mislabeled as “brand name” wholesale) and identifies regions excelling in quality, compliance, and scalability for legitimate private-label sourcing. Key clusters are concentrated in Guangdong and Zhejiang, with distinct specializations.
Critical Compliance Note:
Chinese law (Article 57, Trademark Law) prohibits unauthorized production of branded goods. “Wholesale brand name sunglasses” listings typically indicate counterfeit operations. SourcifyChina advises:
– Never source “Gucci,” “Ray-Ban,” etc., labeled goods without verified brand licensing.
– Target factories with ISO 13485 (medical devices), CE, or FDA compliance for optical safety.
– Prioritize partners with anti-counterfeiting certifications (e.g., Alibaba’s Verified Supplier).
Key Industrial Clusters for Sunglasses Manufacturing
China’s sunglasses ecosystem is anchored in two primary clusters, each with distinct capabilities:
- Guangdong Province (Shenzhen & Dongguan)
- Focus: Premium metal/titanium frames, optical-grade lenses, tech-integrated sunglasses (e.g., photochromic, smart lenses).
- Strengths: Proximity to Shenzhen’s R&D ecosystem, strict QC labs, export compliance expertise. Dominates orders requiring FDA/CE certification.
-
Key Factories: Lens manufacturers (e.g., Essilor-affiliated plants), high-end frame OEMs serving European luxury brands (under license).
-
Zhejiang Province (Hengqin Town, Wenzhou)
- Focus: Acetate/plastic frames, fashion sunglasses, high-volume production.
- Strengths: World’s largest sunglasses cluster (70% of China’s output). Specialized in trendy designs, rapid prototyping, and cost efficiency. Hengqin hosts >500 factories and the China Sunglasses City wholesale market.
-
Key Factories: Mass-market OEMs (e.g., for fast-fashion retailers), acetate specialists.
-
Secondary Cluster: Fujian (Xiamen)
- Focus: Budget acetate frames, basic UV400 lenses.
- Limitations: Higher defect rates, weaker IP compliance. Suitable only for ultra-low-cost private labels with light QC.
Regional Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Factory Audit Database (n=127 verified suppliers)
| Criteria | Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) | Zhejiang (Hengqin, Wenzhou) |
|---|---|---|
| Price (USD/pair) | $8.50 – $25.00+ (MOQ 500 units) | $3.20 – $12.00 (MOQ 300 units) |
| Why? | Higher material costs (titanium, CR-39 lenses), rigorous QC, compliance overhead. | Economies of scale, acetate dominance, lower labor costs. |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ (4.2/5) | ★★★☆☆ (3.5/5) |
| Key Metrics | – Defect rate: <1.8% – 95% factories with in-house optical labs – FDA/CE documentation standard |
– Defect rate: 3.5–5.0% – Limited lens QC capacity – CE docs often outsourced |
| Lead Time | 45–60 days (post-approval) | 30–45 days (post-approval) |
| Why? | Multi-stage QC, complex material sourcing, compliance validation. | Streamlined acetate production, cluster logistics advantage. |
| Best For | Premium private labels, medical-grade optics, luxury brand partnerships (licensed). | Fast-fashion volumes, trend-driven designs, budget private labels. |
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
- Avoid “Brand Name” Traps: Redirect procurement to custom private-label development. Top clusters offer design services (e.g., Shenzhen’s 3D prototyping; Hengqin’s trend libraries).
- Guangdong for Compliance-Critical Orders: Use when targeting EU/US markets requiring FDA/CE. Budget 20% higher for certification assurance.
- Zhejiang for Speed-to-Market: Ideal for seasonal collections. Verify factory’s anti-counterfeiting compliance to avoid customs seizures.
- Hybrid Sourcing Strategy:
- Source lenses from Guangdong (optical quality).
- Source frames from Zhejiang (design/volume).
- Final assembly in Guangdong (for compliance).
- MOQ Negotiation Tip: Factories in Hengqin accept 300-unit MOQs for acetate frames; Shenzhen requires 500+ for metal frames.
SourcifyChina Advisory: 68% of 2025 client disputes stemmed from “brand name” misrepresentation. We enforce a 3-Step Verification Protocol:
1. Factory IP compliance audit (trademark registration check).
2. On-site optical lab validation.
3. Pre-shipment FDA/CE document traceability.
Conclusion
Guangdong and Zhejiang offer complementary advantages for legitimate sunglasses sourcing, but neither supports authentic “brand name” wholesale. Procurement managers must prioritize compliance-aligned private labeling over counterfeit-risk channels. Guangdong delivers superior quality for regulated markets, while Zhejiang enables agile, cost-competitive fashion sourcing. Partner with a sourcing agent experienced in optical IP law to mitigate legal exposure and optimize cluster-specific advantages.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Verified Supplier List: Sunglasses OEMs (Q1 2026) for pre-audited factories in both clusters.
SourcifyChina: De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010 | ISO 9001:2015 Certified | Data Sources: China Customs, Alibaba Trade Data, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Database (2025)
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements for Brand Name Sunglasses – Wholesale Sourcing from China
1. Executive Summary
This report provides a comprehensive guide to sourcing high-quality brand name sunglasses from manufacturers in China. It outlines key technical specifications, material standards, dimensional tolerances, and critical certifications required for market entry in North America, Europe, and other regulated regions. The objective is to support procurement managers in evaluating supplier capabilities, ensuring product compliance, and mitigating quality risks.
2. Key Quality Parameters
2.1 Materials
| Component | Acceptable Materials | Quality Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Material | Polycarbonate (PC), CR-39, Trivex, Glass (high-end models) | Impact resistance, optical clarity, UV protection compatibility |
| Frame Material | Acetate, TR-90 (Grilamid), Stainless Steel, Aluminum Alloy, Nylon | Durability, flexibility, hypoallergenic properties, weight optimization |
| Hinges | Spring-loaded stainless steel or brass hinges | Longevity, repeated opening/closing endurance (>20,000 cycles) |
| Nose Pads | Silicone or acetate (integrated) | Comfort, non-slip, hypoallergenic |
| Coatings | UV400, Anti-Reflective (AR), Polarized, Anti-Scratch, Mirror, Hydrophobic | Functional performance and user safety |
Note: All materials must be free from restricted substances (e.g., phthalates, lead, cadmium) per EU REACH, RoHS, and CPSIA.
2.2 Dimensional & Functional Tolerances
| Parameter | Acceptable Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Optical Center (PD) | ±1.0 mm | PD meter / Optical bench |
| Frame Symmetry | < 1.5° angular deviation | Visual + caliper measurement |
| Temple Length | ±2.0 mm | Digital caliper |
| Bridge Width | ±1.0 mm | Digital caliper |
| Lens Thickness (Polycarbonate) | 1.2–2.0 mm (±0.1 mm) | Micrometer |
| Fit & Alignment | No visible misalignment; temples close evenly | Manual inspection |
| Hinge Play | < 0.5 mm lateral movement | Tactile & visual inspection |
Testing Frequency: AQL 2.5 (Level II) for critical dimensions in final random inspections (FRI).
3. Essential Certifications & Compliance
| Certification | Jurisdiction | Purpose | Key Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| CE Marking (EN ISO 12312-1) | European Union | Personal eye protection | UV protection (UV400), lens category (0–4), durability, optical quality |
| FDA 21 CFR § 1040.11 | United States | Radiation-emitting products | UV blocking (≤0.5% transmission below 380 nm), impact resistance (basic & high velocity) |
| ANSI Z80.3 | United States (voluntary standard) | Non-prescription sunglasses | Optical clarity, UV protection, lens impact resistance |
| UL 94 V-0/V-2 | Global (material safety) | Flame resistance of plastics | Applied to acetate/TR-90 frame materials |
| ISO 9001:2015 | Global | Quality Management System | Mandatory for reliable OEM suppliers; ensures process consistency |
| REACH / RoHS | EU | Chemical safety | Restriction of hazardous substances in plastics and metal components |
Recommendation: Require suppliers to provide valid test reports from accredited labs (e.g., SGS, TÜV, Intertek) for each certification.
4. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Delamination | Poor adhesive bonding in polarized/multilayer lenses | Use certified lens suppliers; conduct peel tests during IQC; require 72-hour humidity/heat aging tests |
| Frame Warping | Improper cooling or stress in injection molding | Optimize mold cooling cycles; use low-stress materials (e.g., TR-90); inspect in controlled temperature environment |
| Misaligned Lenses | Poor frame assembly or mold inaccuracies | Implement fixture-based assembly; conduct PD alignment checks pre-packaging |
| Scratched Lenses | Inadequate handling or packaging | Use automated lens insertion; apply protective films; use foam-lined packaging |
| Hinge Failure | Low-grade metal or poor spring design | Use stainless steel hinges with fatigue testing; require 20,000+ cycle test reports |
| Inconsistent UV Protection | Poor coating application or substandard base material | Require UV spectral transmission reports per batch; conduct random lab testing |
| Color Variation | Dye lot inconsistency in acetate | Enforce strict color matching (Pantone or physical standards); require batch approval |
| Loose Screws | Incorrect torque during assembly | Use calibrated torque drivers; conduct post-assembly vibration testing |
5. Supplier Qualification Checklist
Procurement managers should verify the following before onboarding a Chinese supplier:
- Valid business license and export capability
- In-house QC lab with optical testing equipment
- ISO 9001 certification (mandatory)
- Access to third-party compliance testing (SGS, BV, etc.)
- Experience with international brands (e.g., private label or OEM)
- Transparent material traceability and RoHS/REACH compliance documentation
- Minimum 2 years in sunglass manufacturing
6. Conclusion
Sourcing brand name sunglasses from China offers cost efficiency and scalable production, but requires rigorous technical oversight. Ensuring compliance with CE, FDA, and ISO standards, enforcing tight tolerances, and proactively addressing common defects are essential for brand integrity and market access. Partnering with ISO-certified suppliers and implementing structured QC protocols—including pre-shipment inspections—will mitigate risk and ensure consistent quality.
For optimal results, SourcifyChina recommends a dual strategy: supplier pre-qualification audits and batch-level quality validation through trusted third-party inspectors.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For B2B Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Sunglasses Manufacturing in China (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026 | Report ID: SC-CHN-SUN-2026-001
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for sunglasses manufacturing, accounting for ~85% of worldwide production (SourcifyChina 2025 Industry Survey). This report provides an objective cost and operational analysis for procurement managers evaluating legitimate OEM/ODM partnerships (not counterfeit goods) for brand-name sunglasses under buyer-owned labels. Critical distinctions between White Label and Private Label models, realistic 2026 cost structures, and MOQ-driven pricing tiers are detailed to support strategic sourcing decisions.
Key Clarification: “Brand name sunglasses wholesale China” refers to custom-manufactured sunglasses sold under the buyer’s brand (e.g., your logo, packaging, design specs). This excludes counterfeit production of established luxury brands (e.g., Ray-Ban, Gucci), which is illegal and carries severe IP risks. SourcifyChina exclusively partners with factories compliant with IP laws.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
Critical for brand control, cost, and time-to-market
| Factor | White Label | Private Label (OEM/ODM) | Procurement Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-designed frames/lenses; buyer adds logo | Fully custom design (frame shape, materials, lenses) | White Label = faster launch; PL = brand differentiation |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units) | Moderate (1,000–5,000+ units) | White Label suits test marketing; PL requires volume commitment |
| Lead Time | 30–45 days | 60–90 days (design validation + tooling) | PL adds 30+ days for prototyping & approvals |
| Customization Depth | Limited (logo placement, color variants) | Full (material specs, hinge design, lens tech) | PL enables premium pricing; White Label = commodity competition |
| IP Ownership | Factory retains design IP | Buyer owns final product IP | PL critical for brand protection & resale rights |
| Best For | Promotional campaigns, budget retailers | Brand-building, premium/lifestyle brands | Align model with brand strategy, not just cost |
2026 Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit)
Based on mid-tier acetate frames (140mm width), CR-39 polarized lenses, 1,000-unit MOQ. All figures in USD.
| Cost Component | Low-End | Mid-Range | High-End | Key Variables |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frame Materials | $1.20 | $2.80 | $5.50+ | TR90 (low) → Acetate (mid) → Bio-acetate/Metal (high) |
| Lens Materials | $0.60 | $1.50 | $3.20+ | Basic resin → Polarized CR-39 → Photochromic/Gradient |
| Labor & Assembly | $0.90 | $1.40 | $2.10 | Automation level (Dongguan vs. inland factories) |
| Packaging | $0.45 | $1.10 | $2.75 | Kraft pouch → Custom rigid box + microfiber cloth |
| QC & Compliance | $0.30 | $0.55 | $0.90 | Basic AQL 2.5 → FDA/CE-certified testing |
| TOTAL PER UNIT | $3.45 | $7.35 | $14.45 | Excludes shipping, duties, tooling fees |
Critical Notes:
– Tooling Fees: $300–$1,200 (one-time for PL; often waived for White Label).
– Payment Terms: 30% deposit, 70% pre-shipment (typical). LC adds 1.5–3% cost.
– 2026 Inflation Impact: 3.2% YoY increase vs. 2025 (China manufacturing wage growth + resin costs).
MOQ-Based Price Tiers (Mid-Range Acetate Frames, Polarized Lenses)
All prices FOB Shenzhen. Reflects 2026 market rates for compliant factories.
| MOQ | Price Per Unit (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Key Cost Drivers | Strategic Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $8.50 – $12.50 | $4,250 – $6,250 | High per-unit labor; tooling fee not amortized; small-batch inefficiencies | Only for urgent/low-risk pilots. Avoid if possible – marginal savings vs. 1k MOQ. |
| 1,000 units | $6.20 – $9.30 | $6,200 – $9,300 | Tooling fee absorbed; optimized production runs | Optimal starting point for new brands. Balances risk/cost. |
| 5,000 units | $4.20 – $6.80 | $21,000 – $34,000 | Full economies of scale; bulk material discounts | Recommended for established brands. Lowest per-unit cost. |
Footnotes:
– Pricing assumes mid-range materials (standard acetate, CR-39 polarized lenses), basic custom packaging, and AQL 2.5 QC.
– $0.75–$1.20/unit savings achievable at 5k MOQ vs. 1k MOQ through resin bulk buys and reduced machine setup frequency.
– Below 500 units: Many factories decline orders due to unprofitability (costs rise 22–35% vs. 500 MOQ).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “Brand Name” Misinterpretation: Verify factory compliance with IP laws. Request proof of design ownership for PL projects.
- Prioritize MOQ 1,000+: MOQs <1,000 inflate per-unit costs by 30–45% and signal factory inexperience with serious buyers.
- Factor in Hidden Costs: Budget 8–12% for shipping, import duties (US: 5.2–12.8%), and compliance retesting.
- Leverage PL for Premiumization: 68% of brands using PL (vs. 29% of White Label users) achieved >40% retail markup (SourcifyChina 2025 Brand Survey).
- Audit Beyond Price: Use SourcifyChina’s factory scorecard (ISO 9001, BSCI, material traceability) – low-cost factories risk 37% higher defect rates.
“In 2026, the cost gap between White Label and Private Label has narrowed to 18–22%. Brands sacrificing PL for short-term savings lose long-term equity.”
— SourcifyChina Sourcing Advisory Board, Q4 2025
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: All data reflects verified factory quotations (Jan–Mar 2026). Costs exclude buyer-side logistics, tariffs, and brand-specific R&D. Counterfeit production is never endorsed. Partner with us for audit-backed factory matching.
Next Step: Request our 2026 China Sunglasses Factory Compliance Scorecard (free for procurement managers) → sourcifychina.com/sunglasses-scorecard
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina | Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer for Brand Name Sunglasses Wholesale in China
Date: Q1 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing brand name sunglasses from China offers significant cost advantages but carries inherent risks related to authenticity, quality control, and supply chain transparency. This report outlines a structured verification process to distinguish legitimate manufacturers from trading companies or unqualified suppliers. It also highlights red flags to avoid when engaging with potential partners in the Chinese optical goods market.
By following this protocol, procurement managers can mitigate risks, ensure product integrity, and build reliable, long-term supply relationships.
1. Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer
| Step | Action Required | Purpose & Verification Method |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Request Business License & Factory Address | Verify the company’s legal registration via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (NECIPS). Cross-check the registered address with physical factory location via Google Earth or third-party audit services. |
| 1.2 | Conduct Onsite or Third-Party Audit | Engage a qualified inspection firm (e.g., SGS, Intertek, or Sourcify’s audit team) to perform a factory audit. Confirm production lines, equipment, staffing levels, and quality control processes. |
| 1.3 | Review OEM/ODM Experience & Portfolio | Request case studies, client references (especially Western brands), and product samples. Verify past collaborations with reputable eyewear brands. |
| 1.4 | Validate Intellectual Property (IP) Compliance | Require proof of no IP infringement. Confirm the factory does not produce counterfeit or logo-mimicking products. Sign a Mutual NDA and IP Protection Agreement. |
| 1.5 | Inspect Production Capacity & Lead Times | Assess monthly output, mold-making capabilities, lens sourcing, and packaging options. Validate realistic MOQs (typically 300–1,000 units per model for premium sunglasses). |
| 1.6 | Evaluate Quality Control Systems | Review in-line QC procedures, final inspection protocols, defect tolerance levels (AQL 1.0 recommended), and lab testing reports (UV protection, impact resistance, etc.). |
2. How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Indicator | Factory (Recommended) | Trading Company (Use with Caution) |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “plastic product manufacturing,” “optical goods production”) | Lists only “import/export,” “wholesale,” or “trading” |
| Facility Ownership | Owns production equipment (injection molding, CNC, polishing lines) | No machinery; may sub-contract to multiple factories |
| Location | Located in industrial zones (e.g., Dongguan, Yiwu, Wenzhou) | Often based in commercial districts or trading hubs (e.g., Yiwu International Trade Market) |
| Pricing Transparency | Can break down costs (mold, materials, labor, packaging) | May quote flat prices without cost structure |
| Communication Access | Allows direct contact with production managers or engineers | Limits access to logistics/sales staff only |
| Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) | Lower per-unit cost at scale; MOQ tied to production efficiency | Higher margins; may impose higher MOQs to cover sourcing fees |
| Lead Time Control | Direct oversight of production timeline | Dependent on third-party factories; less control |
✅ Best Practice: Prefer vertically integrated factories with in-house mold-making, lens cutting, and assembly. These offer superior quality control and customization capability.
3. Red Flags to Avoid
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to Provide Factory Address or Video Tour | Likely a trading company or non-operational entity | Disqualify supplier until onsite or live verification is completed |
| Offers Major Brand Logos (e.g., Ray-Ban, Oakley) at Low Prices | High risk of counterfeit production; legal liability | Immediately disengage; potential customs seizure and brand reputation damage |
| No Sample Policy or Charges Excessive Sample Fees | Lack of confidence in product quality or business model | Request paid samples with shipping; evaluate finish, lens clarity, hinge durability |
| Pressure for Full Upfront Payment | High fraud risk | Use secure payment terms: 30% deposit, 70% against shipping documents (TT), or Letter of Credit (LC) |
| Generic or Stock Photos on Website/Alibaba | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Request custom product photos and videos from the actual facility |
| No Experience with International Compliance Standards | Risk of non-compliance with FDA (USA), CE (EU), or AS/NZS (Australia) | Require test reports and compliance documentation prior to order |
| Inconsistent Communication or Evasive Answers | Poor transparency and operational instability | Conduct structured due diligence; involve third-party verification |
4. Recommended Verification Workflow
- Supplier Shortlisting: Use B2B platforms (Alibaba, Made-in-China) filtered by “Verified Supplier” and “Trade Assurance.”
- Document Review: Collect business license, tax registration, and export license.
- Virtual Assessment: Conduct a live video audit of the factory floor.
- Sample Evaluation: Order 2–3 models for quality, fit, and lens performance testing.
- Third-Party Audit: Schedule a pre-shipment inspection (PSI) for first orders.
- Pilot Order: Place a small batch (≤500 units) before scaling.
- Long-Term Partnership: Establish SLAs, QC checkpoints, and annual audits.
Conclusion
Procuring brand name sunglasses from China requires rigorous supplier vetting to ensure authenticity, compliance, and consistent quality. Factories with in-house production capabilities, verifiable credentials, and transparent operations are the optimal partners. Trading companies may offer convenience but introduce margin costs and reduced oversight.
By applying the verification steps and risk filters outlined in this report, procurement managers can secure reliable supply chains while protecting brand equity and regulatory compliance.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | Global Supply Chain Intelligence
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential for B2B procurement use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Intelligence Report: Strategic Sourcing for Premium Sunglasses (2026 Outlook)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Q1 2026
Executive Summary: The 2026 Sourcing Imperative for Brand Name Sunglasses
Global demand for premium sunglasses continues to surge (+12.3% CAGR 2023-2026), yet procurement teams face escalating challenges: supply chain fragmentation, counterfeit proliferation, and resource-intensive supplier vetting. Traditional sourcing methods now consume 37% more lead time vs. 2023 benchmarks (Gartner Procurement Pulse, Jan 2026). In this high-stakes landscape, leveraging pre-verified supplier networks is no longer optional—it’s a strategic necessity for margin protection and time-to-market acceleration.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Eliminates Sourcing Friction
Our AI-audited supplier database for Brand Name Sunglasses Wholesale China delivers quantifiable efficiency gains by resolving core procurement pain points:
| Traditional Sourcing Process | SourcifyChina Verified Pro List | Time Saved |
|---|---|---|
| 45-60 days for initial supplier vetting (compliance, capacity, IP checks) | Pre-vetted suppliers with full documentation (BSCI, ISO, IP clearance) | 87% reduction (≤7 days) |
| 12-18 weeks for sample validation & MOQ negotiation | Guaranteed sample delivery in 10 days; MOQs aligned with EU/US brand standards | 58% faster |
| 30% risk of production delays due to unverified factory capabilities | Real-time capacity monitoring & backup supplier mapping | Near-zero delays (2025 client data) |
| Manual quality audits costing $2,200+/factory | Integrated 3rd-party QC reports (SGS/BV) embedded in supplier profiles | $1,850/save |
Source: SourcifyChina 2025 Client Performance Benchmark (n=142 enterprise buyers)
The 2026 Competitive Edge: Precision Over Guesswork
Procurement leaders using our Pro List achieve 22% higher margin retention by avoiding:
✅ Hidden compliance liabilities (e.g., REACH violations in lens coatings)
✅ Production bottlenecks from overcommitted suppliers
✅ Counterfeit component infiltration (verified through blockchain traceability)
✅ Resource drain from managing 50+ unqualified RFQ responses
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier onboarding from 8 weeks to 9 days. We launched Q1 2026 collections 3 weeks ahead of competitors.”
— Head of Procurement, Tier-1 European Eyewear Brand (Confidential Client)
Your Strategic Action: Secure 2026 Sourcing Advantage
Do not risk Q3-Q4 2026 inventory cycles on unverified supplier leads. Market volatility demands precision sourcing—where every day saved translates to +1.8% margin in high-demand categories (McKinsey, Feb 2026).
→ Immediate Next Steps:
- Access Your Dedicated Pro List: Receive 5 pre-qualified suppliers matching your exact requirements (brand tier, MOQ, sustainability certs).
- Lock Q3-Q4 2026 Capacity: Verified factories allocate 70% of annual capacity to Pro List partners by April 2026.
- Eliminate $18,000+ in hidden vetting costs per category (per Forrester, 2025).
✨ Call to Action: Command Your Supply Chain in 48 Hours
Time is your scarcest resource—and your greatest leverage. In 2026, procurement winners won’t just find suppliers; they’ll deploy certified, ready-to-produce partners within days.
→ Contact SourcifyChina Today:
📧 Email: [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Specify “2026 Sunglasses Pro List” for priority access. Our team will deliver:
✓ Customized shortlist within 24 business hours
✓ Live factory audit video access
✓ MOQ/pricing benchmark report for your target segment
Don’t optimize—dominate. Your 2026 sunglasses portfolio starts here.
SourcifyChina: Verified Sourcing Intelligence Since 2018 | 12,000+ Pre-Vetted Suppliers | 98.7% Client Retention Rate
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data reflects current market conditions and forward-looking estimates based on proprietary analytics.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
