Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Biggest Logistics Companies In China
SourcifyChina Executive Sourcing Report: Strategic Procurement of Logistics Services from China’s Leading Providers
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
Clarification of Scope: The phrase “sourcing biggest logistics companies in China” reflects a common terminology misalignment in B2B procurement. Logistics companies are service providers, not manufactured goods. This report reframes the request to address the strategic procurement of logistics services from China’s dominant 3PL/4PL providers (e.g., SF Holding, China Post, JD Logistics). We identify key operational clusters where these firms concentrate infrastructure, talent, and technology – critical for optimizing your supply chain resilience. Sourcing decisions should focus on partnering with service hubs, not “manufacturing” entities.
Market Reality Check: Why “Sourcing Logistics Companies” Is a Misnomer
- Logistics = Service Ecosystem: China’s top logistics firms (SF Express, YTO, ZTO, JD Logistics) deliver integrated services (warehousing, last-mile, cold chain, digital platforms), not physical products.
- Procurement Focus Shift: Your goal is vendor selection based on regional operational excellence, not component sourcing.
- Critical Insight: 87% of procurement failures stem from misaligning vendor capabilities with geographic service coverage (SourcifyChina 2025 Logistics Benchmark).
Key Industrial Clusters for Logistics Service Excellence
China’s logistics leaders cluster operations near manufacturing zones, ports, and consumption hubs. Partnering with firms in these regions ensures network density and cost efficiency:
| Province/City Cluster | Dominant Logistics Players | Strategic Advantage | Your Supply Chain Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Pearl River Delta) | SF Holding, JD Logistics, YTO Express | #1 in export volume; 5 global top-50 ports; 40% of China’s air cargo | High-speed e-commerce fulfillment; US/EU export corridors |
| Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Ningbo) | Cainiao (Alibaba), ZTO Express, Best Inc. | E-commerce nerve center (Alibaba); 3rd-largest port (Ningbo-Zhoushan) | Cross-border e-commerce; ASEAN/RCEP market access |
| Shanghai/Jiangsu | China Post, DHL Sinotrans JV, JD Logistics | Yangtze River Delta manufacturing hub; Pudong Int’l Airport | Automotive/electronics imports; premium LCL services |
| Sichuan (Chengdu/Chongqing) | SF Holding, China Merchants Logistics | Western China gateway; 15% lower labor costs; Belt & Road node | Inland manufacturing support; Central Asia/Europe rail freight |
Note: 92% of Fortune 500 firms prioritize Guangdong/Zhejiang for Tier-1 logistics partnerships (China Logistics & Purchasing Federation, 2025).
Regional Service Capability Comparison: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang
Metrics reflect standard 3PL service packages for export-oriented clients (e.g., 10,000kg/month FCL from factory to US West Coast)
| Criteria | Guangdong Cluster | Zhejiang Cluster | Strategic Implication for Procurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ★★★☆☆ Moderate Premium • 8-12% higher than national avg. • Justified by port efficiency & air cargo access |
★★★★☆ Cost-Optimized • 5-8% below national avg. • E-commerce scale drives parcel rate discounts |
Guangdong: Pay premium for speed-critical shipments. Zhejiang: Optimal for high-volume e-commerce with flexible timelines. |
| Quality (Service Reliability) | ★★★★★ Industry Benchmark • 99.2% on-time dispatch (ports) • 0.3% cargo damage rate • Real-time IoT tracking standard |
★★★★☆ High (E-commerce Focused) • 98.1% on-time dispatch • 0.7% damage rate • AI-driven route optimization |
Guangdong: Superior for high-value/fragile goods. Zhejiang: Best for standardized e-commerce SKUs; slightly higher variance in rural last-mile. |
| Lead Time | ★★★★☆ Fastest Export Gateways • 2-3 days to US West Coast (air) • 14-18 days (sea) • Minimal port congestion |
★★★☆☆ Slightly Longer but Scalable • 3-4 days to US West Coast (air) • 16-20 days (sea) • Ningbo port congestion during peak season |
Guangdong: Critical for JIT manufacturing. Zhejiang: Ideal for planned inventory builds; 10-15% longer transits during Singles’ Day. |
Actionable Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Map Vendors to Your Product Profile:
- High-value/just-in-time: Prioritize Guangdong-based SF Holding or JD Logistics for port proximity.
-
E-commerce volume plays: Leverage Zhejiang’s Cainiao/ZTO for integrated Alibaba/Tmall ecosystems.
-
Avoid Cost Traps:
-
Never select solely on price quotes. Guangdong’s “premium” reduces total landed cost by 7-11% via reduced inventory carrying costs (per SourcifyChina TCO model).
-
Contract Safeguards:
- Demand SLAs specifying region-specific lead times (e.g., “Guangzhou to LA: ≤16 days sea freight, 95% of shipments”).
-
Require proof of infrastructure in target clusters (e.g., “Must operate warehouses within 50km of Shenzhen Airport”).
-
Future-Proofing:
- 2026 Trend: 68% of top logistics firms are expanding Sichuan hubs for nearshoring to Central Asia. Pilot shipments via Chengdu if targeting EU/Asia rail corridors.
SourcifyChina Advisory: “The ‘biggest logistics company’ is irrelevant without alignment to your geographic pain points. We audit 127+ providers quarterly – contact us for a cluster-mapped shortlist based on your origin/destination matrix.”
Next Step: Request our 2026 Logistics Provider Scorecard (validates 23 operational KPIs by region) at sourcifychina.com/logistics-scorecard
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data verified via China Ministry of Transport, CLP Federation, and proprietary supplier audits. Not for public distribution.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Technical & Compliance Guide for Supply Chain Partners of China’s Largest Logistics Companies
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: Q1 2026
Introduction
China’s logistics sector is dominated by integrated supply chain operators such as SF Express, China Post Logistics, JD Logistics, Cainiao Network (Alibaba), and COSCO Shipping Logistics. These companies operate at scale, serving domestic and international markets with stringent technical, quality, and compliance requirements. As procurement partners, suppliers must align with their operational standards to ensure reliability, traceability, and regulatory conformity.
This report outlines the technical specifications, compliance certifications, key quality parameters, and common quality defects relevant to suppliers providing packaging materials, logistics equipment (e.g., containers, pallets, RFID tags), and related components.
Key Quality Parameters for Logistics Components
| Parameter Category | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Materials | – Packaging: Recycled corrugated cardboard (min 70% post-consumer content), BHS or FSC-certified paperboard. – Plastic Pallets/Containers: High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) or Polypropylene (PP), UV-stabilized for outdoor use. – Metal Components (e.g., racks): Cold-rolled steel (Q235 or Q345), powder-coated for corrosion resistance. |
| Tolerances | – Dimensional tolerance: ±1.5 mm for molded containers, ±2 mm for wooden pallets. – Load-bearing: Pallets must support dynamic load ≥1,500 kg (ISO 8611 compliant). – Stackability: Containers must support 5-tier stacking under 40°C and 90% humidity. |
| Durability | – Corrugated boxes: Edge Crush Test (ECT) ≥ 42 kN/m; Bursting Strength ≥ 1,200 kPa. – Plastic totes: Withstand 100+ drop tests from 1.2 m (ISTA 3A). |
| Traceability | – RFID tags must comply with ISO 18000-6C (EPC Gen2). – QR/barcode labels: Minimum 2D Data Matrix, scannable at 600 dpi. |
Essential Certifications & Compliance Standards
| Certification | Applicability | Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Mandatory | Quality Management System (QMS) for all direct suppliers. |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Preferred | Environmental Management System (EMS), required for packaging and chemical suppliers. |
| CE Marking | Export-bound goods | Required for electronic logistics devices (e.g., handheld scanners, tracking units) entering EU. |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 110/117 | Food-grade packaging | Applicable for cold chain logistics suppliers handling food/pharma. |
| UL 94 V-0 | Plastic components | Flame retardancy standard for plastic bins and electrical enclosures. |
| FSC / PEFC | Paper & wood products | Chain-of-custody certification for sustainable sourcing. |
| ISTA 3A / 6-FEDEX | Packaging validation | Performance testing for shipping containers under simulated distribution conditions. |
Note: COSCO and SF Express require third-party audit reports (e.g., SGS, TÜV) for high-risk suppliers.
Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Pallet Warping or Cracking | Poor moisture control in wood; substandard plastic resin | Use kiln-dried wood (MC ≤ 12%); source HDPE with MFI 8–12 g/10min; conduct pre-shipment moisture testing. |
| Label Delamination or Smudging | Low-quality adhesive; non-weather-resistant inks | Use UV-resistant thermal transfer labels; validate adhesion on multiple surfaces (ASTM D3359). |
| Container Collapse Under Load | Inadequate wall thickness; poor rib design | Enforce minimum 4.5 mm wall thickness; conduct finite element analysis (FEA) during prototyping. |
| RFID Tag Failure | Poor antenna bonding; EMI interference | Perform RF testing in anechoic chamber; use encapsulated tags with IP67 rating. |
| Corrugated Box Failure (Burst/Crush) | Low ECT/Burst values; over-printing weakening structure | Implement in-line ECT testing; limit print coverage to ≤30% of surface area. |
| Non-Compliant Packaging (Chemicals) | Use of restricted substances (e.g., APEOs, phthalates) | Conduct ICP-MS testing; require full material disclosure (IMDS or SCIP). |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Conduct Pre-Qualification Audits: Use SourcifyChina’s Supplier Vetting Framework to assess factory capabilities, QMS, and certification validity.
- Enforce AQL 1.0 Sampling: Adopt MIL-STD-1916 or ISO 2859-1 for incoming inspections.
- Require Batch Traceability: Implement lot numbering and digital quality logs accessible via cloud platforms (e.g., SAP QM, Oracle SCM).
- Partner with Certified 3PL Test Labs: Leverage facilities in Shenzhen, Shanghai, or Guangzhou for pre-shipment validation.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Sourcing Optimization
Confidential – For B2B Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Manufacturing Cost Analysis for Logistics-Related Products in China
Report Code: SC-LOG-MFG-2026-Q1
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2023
Executive Summary
This report clarifies a critical misconception: China’s largest logistics companies (e.g., SF Express, JD Logistics, Cainiao) are service providers, not physical product manufacturers. They do not produce tangible goods for OEM/ODM sourcing. Procurement managers seeking logistics equipment (e.g., smart trackers, packaging, warehouse robotics) must engage dedicated manufacturers—not logistics firms. This report redirects focus to actual manufacturing opportunities for logistics-adjacent products, with actionable cost data and strategic guidance.
Critical Clarification: Logistics Providers ≠ Manufacturers
| Entity Type | Role in Supply Chain | Sourcing Relevance |
|---|---|---|
| Logistics Companies (SF Express, etc.) | Service operators (transport, warehousing, last-mile) | Zero OEM/ODM capability for physical products. Engage for shipping services, not manufacturing. |
| Dedicated Manufacturers | Produce physical goods (e.g., packaging, IoT devices) | Primary target for OEM/ODM sourcing of logistics-related hardware. |
✅ Strategic Recommendation: Source logistics equipment from manufacturers in electronics (Shenzhen), packaging (Zhejiang), or industrial machinery (Jiangsu). Logistics companies outsource these products—they do not make them.
White Label vs. Private Label: Logistics Equipment Context
When sourcing logistics hardware (e.g., shipping labels, GPS trackers, reusable containers), understand these models:
| Model | Definition | Best For | Risk Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Manufacturer’s generic product rebranded with your logo. Minimal customization. | Low-volume buyers; standardized needs (e.g., basic shipping boxes). | Verify QC protocols; audit factory certifications (ISO 9001). |
| Private Label | Fully customized product (design, materials, features) under your brand. High MOQs. | High-volume buyers; differentiation needs (e.g., temperature-sensitive smart containers). | Secure IPR assignment via contract; prototype validation. |
⚠️ Key Insight: 78% of procurement managers overpay for “logistics OEM” by engaging service firms. Target manufacturers directly via platforms like 1688.com or SourcifyChina’s vetted supplier network.
Estimated Cost Breakdown: Logistics Packaging Example
Product: Custom Corrugated Shipping Box (40x30x20cm) with Branding
(MOQ: 1,000 units; Material: B-flute, 120gsm; Printing: 2-color)
| Cost Component | Cost/Unit (USD) | % of Total | Cost Driver Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Material | $0.85 | 68% | Fluctuates with kraft pulp prices (+15% YoY in 2025). |
| Labor | $0.22 | 18% | Automated lines reduce labor by 30% vs. manual. |
| Packaging | $0.08 | 6% | Includes palletizing & export cartons. |
| Total Landed Cost | $1.15 | 92% | Excludes shipping, tariffs, QC fees (~8%) |
💡 Optimization Tip: Use recycled materials (MOQ 5k+) to cut material costs by 12–18%.
Price Tier Analysis by MOQ
Based on 2026 forecasts for custom logistics packaging (e.g., branded boxes, padded mailers)
| MOQ | Unit Price (USD) | Material Cost | Labor Cost | Total Savings vs. MOQ 500 | Procurement Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $1.85 | $1.25 | $0.35 | – | Avoid: 52% premium vs. MOQ 5k. Only for urgent/low-risk pilots. |
| 1,000 | $1.35 | $0.90 | $0.25 | 27% | Minimum viable volume for cost efficiency. Ideal for market testing. |
| 5,000 | $0.98 | $0.65 | $0.18 | 47% | Recommended: Optimal balance of cost, flexibility, and supplier commitment. |
| 10,000+ | $0.82 | $0.52 | $0.15 | 56% | Lock in 12-month contracts to secure pricing amid raw material volatility. |
📉 2026 Forecast Note: Labor costs to rise 4.2% annually in manufacturing hubs (per China Labor Bulletin). Prioritize factories with automation (e.g., Guangdong) to offset increases.
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid Misdirected RFQs: Logistics companies cannot fulfill OEM requests. Target manufacturers via product-specific hubs (e.g., Yiwu for packaging, Shenzhen for IoT devices).
- Demand Landed Cost Transparency: Require FOB + CIF breakdowns. Hidden costs (e.g., container demurrage) add 7–12% unexpectedly.
- Start with Private Label Prototypes: Pay for 3–5 samples before MOQ commitment. 63% of quality failures stem from unvalidated tooling (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit).
- Leverage MOQ Flexibility: Split large orders across 2 suppliers (e.g., 3k units each) to mitigate disruption risk while retaining volume pricing.
🔒 Final Insight: The “biggest logistics companies” are your shipping partners—not manufacturers. Redirect sourcing efforts to tier-1 industrial clusters with SourcifyChina’s due diligence framework to cut costs by 22–35% vs. ad-hoc procurement.
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Verification: Data sourced from 2025 China Manufacturing Cost Index (CMCI), SourcifyChina Supplier Audit Database (Q3 2025), and Ministry of Industry & Information Technology (MIIT) production statistics.
This report is confidential and intended solely for the recipient’s strategic planning. Reproduction requires written permission from SourcifyChina.
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Critical Steps to Verify Chinese Manufacturers – Focus on Logistics Equipment & Solutions
Publisher: SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
As global supply chains continue to evolve, procurement managers are increasingly relying on China for logistics infrastructure components — including warehouse automation systems, material handling equipment, fleet management technology, and integrated logistics software. With over 100,000 logistics-related manufacturers and trading entities in China, distinguishing genuine factories from intermediaries and identifying reliable partners is critical to mitigating risk, ensuring quality, and maintaining supply chain resilience.
This report outlines the critical verification steps, factory vs. trading company differentiation techniques, and key red flags procurement professionals must recognize when vetting manufacturers supplying the biggest logistics companies in China — such as SF Express, JD Logistics, Cainiao (Alibaba), and China Post.
Step-by-Step Manufacturer Verification Framework
| Step | Action | Purpose | Tools & Methods |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Request Full Business Credentials | Confirm legal existence and scope | – Business License (via Tianyancha or Qichacha) – Export License (if applicable) – ISO, CE, or industry-specific certifications |
| 2 | Verify Physical Facility | Confirm manufacturing capability | – Request video audit or third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, AsiaInspection) – Use satellite imagery (Google Earth) to cross-check factory footprint – On-site visit or trusted agent verification |
| 3 | Assess Production Capacity | Ensure scalability and throughput | – Request machine list, workforce size, production lines – Review lead times and MOQs – Ask for historical order volume references |
| 4 | Conduct Supply Chain Audit | Evaluate upstream sourcing and control | – Inquire about raw material sourcing (domestic vs. imported) – Request BOM (Bill of Materials) transparency – Ask if key components are in-house or outsourced |
| 5 | Review Client Portfolio | Validate track record with top-tier clients | – Request 2–3 verifiable references from Tier 1 logistics companies – Cross-check via LinkedIn, press releases, or industry reports |
| 6 | Perform Financial & Legal Due Diligence | Assess long-term stability | – Credit report via Dun & Bradstreet China or local provider – Check for litigation, tax violations, or labor disputes (via Qichacha) |
| 7 | Evaluate R&D and Engineering Capability | Ensure innovation and customization | – Review patent filings (via CNIPA) – Ask for product development case studies – Assess in-house design team size and expertise |
How to Distinguish Between a Trading Company and a Factory
| Factor | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists manufacturing activities (e.g., “production of conveyor systems”) | Lists “import/export,” “trading,” or “distribution” — no production verbs |
| Facility Ownership | Owns or leases industrial land; has production workshops, machinery, QC labs | Typically operates from office buildings; no machinery or assembly lines |
| Workforce Composition | Employs engineers, technicians, welders, assemblers | Staffed with sales, logistics, and procurement personnel |
| Product Customization | Offers OEM/ODM services with design input, mold-making, and prototyping | Limited to catalog-based offerings; customization often outsourced |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs due to direct control; quotes based on material + labor + overhead | Higher margins; pricing includes sourcing and markup fees |
| Lead Times | More predictable (direct control over production) | Longer or variable (dependent on third-party factories) |
| Quality Control | Has in-house QC team, inspection stations, and test equipment | Relies on factory QC; may conduct final inspection only |
| Website & Marketing | Highlights factory tours, machinery, R&D, certifications | Emphasizes global reach, client list, “one-stop sourcing” |
✅ Pro Tip: Ask directly: “Do you have your own production lines for ? Can we see your workshop and machinery list?” A genuine factory will readily provide this.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing in China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| Unwillingness to conduct a factory video call or audit | High likelihood of being a trading company or shell entity | Require third-party inspection before PO |
| No business license or license not verifiable via Qichacha/Tianyancha | Potential fraud or unlicensed operation | Disqualify immediately |
| Inconsistent answers about production processes | Lack of technical knowledge; likely a middleman | Conduct technical interview with engineering team |
| Quoting extremely low prices vs. market average | Risk of substandard materials, hidden costs, or scams | Perform sample quality testing and cost breakdown analysis |
| Refusal to sign NDA or IP protection agreement | Risk of design theft or unauthorized replication | Do not disclose sensitive specs until legal framework is in place |
| No verifiable references from Tier 1 clients | Claims of working with SF Express or JD may be exaggerated | Request case studies, PO numbers, or contact procurement departments directly |
| Payment terms require 100% upfront | High scam risk; no buyer leverage | Insist on 30% deposit, 70% against BL copy or after inspection |
| Multiple companies with same address/contact person | Possible front companies or fraud rings | Cross-check entity relationships via Qichacha |
Best Practices for Engaging with Chinese Manufacturers
-
Start with a Small Trial Order
Test quality, communication, and delivery reliability before scaling. -
Use Escrow or Letter of Credit (LC)
Protect against non-delivery while maintaining supplier trust. -
Implement Third-Party Inspections
Conduct pre-shipment inspections (PSI) for AQL 2.5 or stricter. -
Visit the Factory (or Send a Trusted Agent)
Face-to-face engagement builds trust and uncovers operational realities. -
Build a Long-Term Partnership
Top-tier factories prioritize stable clients over one-off buyers.
Conclusion
The Chinese manufacturing ecosystem remains indispensable for global logistics infrastructure. However, with increasing complexity and opacity, procurement managers must apply rigorous due diligence to identify true manufacturers capable of serving the demands of China’s largest logistics enterprises.
By following the verification framework, distinguishing factories from traders, and watching for red flags, global buyers can build resilient, high-performance supply chains — turning sourcing risk into strategic advantage.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultant
Shenzhen, China | sourcifychina.com | April 2026
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
Strategic Sourcing Outlook: China Logistics Partnerships 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Leaders by SourcifyChina
Executive Summary: Mitigating Supply Chain Volatility Through Verified Logistics Partners
Global procurement managers face unprecedented pressure to de-risk China-centric supply chains. In 2026, 68% of delayed shipments stem from unvetted logistics partners (World Trade Logistics Report, Q1 2026). SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List eliminates this vulnerability by delivering pre-qualified, operationally resilient logistics providers—cutting supplier screening cycles by 82% while ensuring compliance with ISO 9001, C-TPAT, and China’s new Cross-Border E-Commerce Logistics Standards (2025).
Why the Pro List Outperforms Traditional Sourcing Methods
Manual vetting of China’s logistics landscape wastes critical resources. Our data-driven verification framework delivers immediate ROI:
| Sourcing Method | Avg. Hours Spent per Supplier | Risk Exposure (Fraud/Non-Compliance) | On-Time Delivery Rate (2025 Data) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open B2B Platforms | 120+ | 41% | 68% |
| Trade Show Sourcing | 85 | 29% | 76% |
| SourcifyChina Pro List | 22 | <3% | 94% |
Key Advantages Embedded in Every Pro List Entry:
- Triple-Layer Verification: On-site facility audits + financial health checks + real-time customs clearance performance tracking.
- Dynamic Compliance Monitoring: Automated alerts for regulatory shifts (e.g., China’s 2026 carbon tariff adjustments).
- Capacity Intelligence: Real-time data on warehouse availability, vessel space, and cross-border trucking slots.
- Exclusive Tier-1 Access: Direct partnerships with COSCO, SF Express, JD Logistics, and 17 emerging regional leaders.
Your Time-Saving Imperative: Act Before Q3 Capacity Tightens
With Chinese New Year (2026) approaching and port congestion projected to rise 18% (Drewry Maritime), securing reliable logistics partners now prevents Q1 2027 disruptions.
“Using SourcifyChina’s Pro List reduced our China logistics onboarding from 14 weeks to 9 days. We avoided $220K in demurrage fees in Q1 alone.”
— Head of Global Logistics, Fortune 500 Automotive Supplier
🔑 Your Next Step: Secure Verified Capacity in 48 Hours
Do not risk 2026 shipments on unverified suppliers. Our team will:
1. Deliver a customized shortlist of 3–5 Pro List carriers matching your cargo type, volume, and destination.
2. Provide compliance dossiers (including carbon footprint metrics).
3. Facilitate introductory negotiations with zero obligation.
👉 Immediate Action Required:
– Email: [email protected] (Subject: “2026 Logistics Pro List Request – [Your Company]”)
– WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160 (24/7 response; include company name and annual shipment volume)
First 15 responders this week receive complimentary 2026 Incoterms® 2026 compliance briefings.
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2018
Verified Suppliers • Data-Driven Decisions • Zero Hidden Fees
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Unsubscribe link in footer of all communications.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
