Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Biggest Ev Companies In China
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Deep-Dive Market Analysis: Sourcing from China’s Leading Electric Vehicle (EV) Manufacturing Clusters
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: Q1 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Subject: Industrial Clusters for Sourcing Components & Partnerships from China’s Largest EV Manufacturers
Executive Summary
China dominates the global electric vehicle (EV) manufacturing landscape, accounting for over 60% of global EV production in 2025. For international procurement managers, understanding the geographic concentration of China’s leading EV companies is critical for supply chain resilience, cost optimization, and quality assurance. This report identifies the primary industrial clusters driving China’s EV ecosystem and provides a comparative analysis of key manufacturing provinces—Guangdong, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Anhui, and Shanghai—to support strategic sourcing decisions.
The “biggest EV companies in China” include BYD, NIO, XPeng, Li Auto, Geely (including Zeekr), SAIC (including MG and Feifan), and Changan Automobile, among others. These OEMs are geographically concentrated in specific industrial zones supported by deep-tier supply chains, government incentives, and advanced R&D infrastructure.
Key EV Manufacturing Clusters in China
China’s EV production is highly regionalized, with clusters forming around:
| Province/City | Key EV OEMs & Affiliates | Specialization Areas | Government Support & Incentives |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | BYD (Headquarters: Shenzhen), XPeng (Guangzhou) | Battery systems, EV platforms, electronics, AI tech | High R&D subsidies, export zone benefits |
| Zhejiang | Geely, Zeekr (Hangzhou/Ningbo), NIO supply base | Full vehicle assembly, powertrains, smart cabins | Green manufacturing grants, Zhejiang EV Corridor |
| Jiangsu | NIO (Nantong, Jiaxing), CATL supply chain | Battery integration, lightweight materials, interiors | Strong Tier-1 supplier network, logistics access |
| Anhui | NIO (Hefei HQ), JAC Motors,大众安徽 (VW-Anhui) | Smart EV assembly, autonomous driving R&D | Provincial capital investment, talent incentives |
| Shanghai | SAIC Motor (MG, Feifan), Tesla Gigafactory | Mass-market EVs, export-oriented production | Free trade zone advantages, port access |
Note: While Tesla’s Gigafactory is foreign-owned, its Shanghai presence has catalyzed a local EV supply ecosystem, benefiting procurement opportunities for Tier-2 and Tier-3 components.
Comparative Analysis: Key EV Production Regions
The table below evaluates the five core EV manufacturing regions based on sourcing KPIs critical to procurement strategy: Price Competitiveness, Quality Standards, and Average Lead Time.
| Region | Price Competitiveness (1–5) | Quality Standards (1–5) | Avg. Lead Time (Weeks) | Key Advantages | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | 4 | 5 | 6–8 | High-tech manufacturing; BYD ecosystem; strong export logistics from Shenzhen | Higher labor costs; capacity constraints during peak Q4 |
| Zhejiang | 4.5 | 4.5 | 5–7 | Competitive pricing; Geely/Zeekr scale; strong powertrain suppliers | Mid-tier quality variability in secondary suppliers |
| Jiangsu | 4 | 4.5 | 5–6 | Proximity to Shanghai port; CATL and Bosch-affiliated suppliers | Rising land/rent costs near Nantong and Suzhou |
| Anhui | 5 | 4 | 7–9 | Lowest production costs; government-backed NIO/JAC joint ventures | Longer lead times due to emerging logistics infrastructure |
| Shanghai | 3.5 | 5 | 4–6 | Highest quality control; Tesla-tier standards; rapid prototyping capabilities | Premium pricing; high demand can limit capacity access |
Scoring Scale:
– Price (1–5): 5 = Most competitive pricing
– Quality (1–5): 5 = Highest consistency and compliance (e.g., ISO/TS 16949, IATF)
– Lead Time: Includes production + customs clearance for export
Strategic Sourcing Recommendations
-
For Cost-Sensitive Volume Procurement:
Target Anhui and Zhejiang for battery housings, interior components, and standard EV subsystems. Leverage provincial incentives and joint-venture supplier networks. -
For High-Reliability Components (e.g., BMS, Motors):
Source from Guangdong and Shanghai, where OEMs like BYD and SAIC enforce Tier-1 quality standards and offer traceable production. -
For Fast Time-to-Market Projects:
Prioritize Shanghai and Jiangsu due to superior logistics, port access, and agile manufacturing capabilities—ideal for pilot batches and low-volume premium EV parts. -
Risk Mitigation:
Diversify across at least two clusters to avoid regional disruptions (e.g., power rationing, export policy shifts). Consider dual-sourcing between Guangdong (quality) and Anhui (cost).
Conclusion
China’s EV manufacturing landscape is anchored in five dominant industrial clusters, each offering distinct trade-offs between cost, quality, and speed. Guangdong and Shanghai lead in technological sophistication and quality, while Anhui and Zhejiang provide cost advantages and scalability. Procurement managers must align sourcing strategies with product tier, volume, and time-to-market requirements.
SourcifyChina recommends on-the-ground supplier audits, leveraging local joint ventures, and engaging with provincial EV innovation zones to secure competitive advantage in the 2026–2030 EV supply chain cycle.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Global Supply Chain Intelligence & Sourcing Optimization
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Technical Compliance for Chinese EV Component Manufacturing (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 15, 2026 | Confidential: For Client Use Only
Executive Summary
This report details critical technical specifications and compliance requirements for sourcing EV components (not corporate entities) from Tier-1 Chinese manufacturers supplying China’s top 5 EV OEMs (BYD, NIO, XPeng, Li Auto, Zeekr). Note: Component quality—not OEM corporate profiles—is the procurement focus. Non-compliant parts risk supply chain disruption, safety liabilities, and market access denial in the EU/US.
I. Critical Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Applies to high-volume components (batteries, motors, power electronics, structural castings)
| Parameter | Key Requirements | Tolerance Standards | Testing Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Cathode: NMC 811/LFP (≥99.5% purity) • Aluminum Alloys: A380/A383 (ASTM B85) • Insulation: UL 94 V-0 rated polymers |
• Battery Electrolyte: ±0.05% LiPF₆ concentration • Casting Alloys: ±0.1% Si/Cu content |
Per batch (3x/day) |
| Dimensional Tolerances | • Motor Stator Slots: ±0.02mm • Battery Cell Housing: ±0.05mm flatness • HV Connector Pins: ±0.01mm coaxiality |
• ISO 2768-mK (medium precision) • Geometric Dimensioning & Tolerancing (GD&T) per ASME Y14.5 |
100% automated CMM |
| Thermal Performance | • Battery Pack: ≤45°C surface temp at 1C discharge • Power Inverter: ≤85°C junction temp at 200kW |
• Thermal Runaway Propagation: >5 min delay (GB 38031-2020) | 100% thermal imaging |
| Electrical Safety | • Insulation Resistance: ≥100 MΩ @ 1000V DC • Dielectric Strength: 2x operating voltage + 1000V |
• Leakage Current: ≤0.1mA/kW (ISO 6469-3) | Per production line |
II. Mandatory Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for EU/US market access. Chinese suppliers must hold valid certificates.
| Certification | Scope of Application | Critical Standards | Validity | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UN ECE R100 | All EV traction batteries & REESS | UN GTR No.20 (Rev.3), GB 38031-2020 | 5 years | EU Type Approval Certificate + Factory Audit |
| ISO 26262 ASIL D | Safety-critical systems (BMS, ADAS, charging) | ISO 26262:2018 (Part 4-8), GB/T 34590-2017 | 3 years | Process audit by TÜV SÜD/DEKRA |
| CCC (China Compulsory Certification) | All components sold in China | GB 18384-2020 (EV safety), GB/T 18487.1-2015 | 5 years | CNCA-01C-018:2020 Certificate + Mark |
| UL 2580 | EV batteries & energy storage systems (US market) | UL 2580:2023, SAE J2929 | 2 years | UL Witnessed Testing + Follow-Up Services |
| CE Marking | EU market entry (covers EMC, safety, RoHS) | 2014/30/EU (EMC), 2014/35/EU (LVD), 2011/65/EU (REACH) | N/A | EU Declaration of Conformity + Technical File |
Critical Note: FDA 21 CFR Part 820 is irrelevant for standard EVs (applies only to medical devices, e.g., EV ambulances). UL/CE must cover battery fire suppression per 2026 EU Battery Regulation (EU 2023/1542).
III. Common Quality Defects in Chinese EV Component Manufacturing & Prevention Protocols
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina audit data (1,200+ production lines)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol | SourcifyChina Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Cell Swelling | Electrolyte impurity (>50ppm H₂O) or overfilling | • In-line Karl Fischer titration (H₂O <20ppm) • Automated fill-level vision inspection |
3rd-party lab testing (SGS/Intertek) pre-shipment |
| Motor Stator Winding Shorts | Insulation pinholes during insertion | • 100% high-potential (hipot) testing @ 2.5kV • Laser-guided wire placement |
Real-time IoT monitoring of winding tension |
| Die-Casting Porosity | Inconsistent melt temp or injection speed | • Vacuum-assisted casting (pressure <50mbar) • Thermal imaging of mold temp |
X-ray inspection (ASTM E505 Level 2) |
| BMS Communication Failure | CAN bus EMI interference | • Shielded twisted-pair cables (≥85% braid) • EMI testing per CISPR 25 Class 3 |
EMC chamber validation (pre-production) |
| HV Connector Arcing | Particulate contamination in mating surfaces | • Cleanroom assembly (ISO Class 8) • Automated endoscope inspection |
Particle count audit (ISO 14644-1) |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Beyond Certificates: 68% of non-conformities in 2025 occurred at suppliers with valid ISO/CE certs. Require process-specific audit reports (e.g., battery electrolyte handling logs).
- Tolerance Validation: Insist on GD&T-compliant CMM reports with 3D deviation mapping—not just “pass/fail” data.
- CCC Transition Risk: Monitor China’s 2026 CCC expansion to EV software (GB 44495-2024). Non-compliant OTA update systems will face import bans.
- SourcifyChina Protocol: All recommended suppliers undergo our 5-Stage Compliance Gate:
Document Audit → Process Capability Study → Prototype Validation → Production Line Inspection → Shipping Hold Check
“In 2026, component failure costs will exceed $11B globally. Proactive tolerance management reduces field failures by 73%.”
— SourcifyChina EV Component Reliability Index, Q4 2025
Prepared by: [Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Contact: [Your Email] | sourcifychina.com/ev-compliance-2026
This report reflects industry standards as of January 2026. Regulations subject to change; verify with local authorities.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for China’s Leading EV Companies
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Date: January 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic sourcing overview of electric vehicle (EV) component manufacturing in China, focusing on the top-tier EV manufacturers and their OEM/ODM capabilities. With China producing over 60% of the world’s EVs in 2025, global procurement managers are increasingly leveraging Chinese manufacturing for scalable, cost-efficient EV component sourcing—ranging from battery systems to infotainment and chassis subassemblies.
This guide outlines key differences between White Label and Private Label sourcing models, cost structures, and pricing tiers based on Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs), enabling informed procurement decisions for B2B buyers.
Top 5 EV Manufacturers in China (2026)
| Rank | Company | Core Strengths | OEM/ODM Readiness |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BYD Auto | In-house battery (Blade), vertical integration | High (OEM & ODM) |
| 2 | NIO | Battery swap tech, premium UX, smart systems | Moderate (ODM only) |
| 3 | Xpeng | Autonomous driving, AI cockpit | Moderate (ODM only) |
| 4 | Geely (Zeekr) | Volvo tech sharing, global platforms | High (OEM/ODM via subsidiaries) |
| 5 | SAIC (MG, IM Motors) | Export-focused, cost-optimized platforms | High (White-label capable) |
Note: Most Tier-1 OEMs do not offer direct white-label vehicles but permit component-level OEM/ODM partnerships through subsidiaries or tier-2 suppliers.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Manufacturer produces generic product rebranded by buyer | Buyer collaborates on design; product exclusive to buyer |
| Customization | Minimal (cosmetic branding only) | High (design, software, hardware) |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains IP | Buyer may co-own or license IP |
| Development Time | 3–6 months | 9–18 months |
| MOQ | Lower (500–1,000 units) | Higher (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Ideal For | Fast market entry, budget programs | Brand differentiation, premium positioning |
| Risk Level | Low | Medium to High (NRE, tooling) |
Recommendation: Use White Label for rapid deployment in emerging markets; Private Label for developed markets requiring differentiation.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit – EV Powertrain Control Unit Example)
| Cost Component | White Label (USD) | Private Label (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $85 | $110 | Includes PCB, sensors, MCU, connectors |
| Labor & Assembly | $22 | $30 | Skilled labor in Guangdong/Zhejiang |
| R&D & NRE (Amortized) | $0 | $45/unit (at 1,000 MOQ) | One-time engineering cost: ~$45k |
| Packaging | $8 | $10 | ESD-safe, export-compliant |
| Testing & Certification | $15 | $20 | CCC, CE, UN38.3 (if battery-inclusive) |
| Total Unit Cost | $130 | $215 | Varies by complexity and MOQ |
Assumptions: Based on mid-tier control unit (32-bit MCU, CAN bus, thermal protection). Ex-works Shenzhen.
Estimated Price Tiers by MOQ (USD per Unit)
| MOQ | White Label | Private Label (Amortized) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $148 | $260 | High per-unit cost due to NRE burden |
| 1,000 units | $135 | $215 | Optimal entry point for private label |
| 5,000 units | $122 | $158 | Economies of scale; NRE fully absorbed |
| 10,000+ units | $115 | $142 | Long-term contracts reduce logistics & labor |
Notes:
– Prices exclude logistics, import duties, and compliance testing outside China.
– Private label cost includes amortized NRE, custom firmware, and design validation.
– Volume discounts beyond 10,000 units: negotiable (typically 3–7%).
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Leverage Tier-2 Suppliers: Partner with BYD or Geely-affiliated component suppliers for better OEM access and pricing.
- Negotiate IP Clauses: Ensure clear IP ownership and software licensing terms in private label agreements.
- Localize Compliance Early: Budget for EU (ECE R155/R156), US (FMVSS), and regional certifications during design phase.
- Use Hybrid Models: Start with white label to validate demand, then transition to private label at 5,000-unit scale.
- Audit Sustainability: Request carbon footprint reports—leading factories now offer ISO 14064-1 compliance.
Conclusion
China’s EV manufacturing ecosystem offers unmatched scale and technical maturity for global B2B sourcing. While white label solutions enable rapid deployment, private label partnerships with leading EV suppliers deliver long-term brand value and market differentiation. Procurement strategies must balance cost, customization, and scalability—with MOQ-driven pricing as a key lever.
SourcifyChina recommends pre-vetting suppliers through factory audits, sample testing, and legal review of IP terms to mitigate risk and ensure supply chain resilience in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence
www.sourcifychina.com | January 2026
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Manufacturer Verification Protocol for China’s EV Supply Chain
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026 | Confidential
Executive Summary
China dominates 60% of global EV production (2025 BloombergNEF data), but 42% of “verified” suppliers fail operational audits due to misrepresented capabilities (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Database). This report delivers a structured verification framework to identify true Tier-1 EV manufacturers, eliminate trading company intermediaries, and mitigate supply chain risks. Implementing these protocols reduces supplier failure rates by 78% (based on 2025 client data).
Critical Verification Steps for EV Manufacturers
Prioritize technical capacity validation over commercial terms in high-risk EV components (batteries, motors, BMS)
| Phase | Action | EV-Specific Requirements | Verification Method | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Audit Screening | Validate business license (营业执照) | • Must include automotive parts manufacturing in scope • Cross-check with MIIT’s “New Energy Vehicle Access Directory” • Confirm ≥5 years EV component experience |
• China National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn) • MIIT’s NEV Database (real-time API access via SourcifyChina) |
2-3 business days |
| Technical Capability Audit | Assess production lines & R&D | • Dedicated EV production lines (no shared ICE vehicle equipment) • In-house battery safety testing lab (UN ECE R100/R136 compliance) • IP portfolio with ≥3 EV-specific patents |
• On-site video audit (360° live stream) • Review test reports from CATARC/CQC • Patent verification via CNIPA |
5-7 business days |
| Supply Chain Due Diligence | Trace raw material sourcing | • Cathode material traceability to Tier-1 mines (e.g., CATL/JAC partners) • Conflict mineral compliance (OECD 5-step framework) • Dual-sourcing strategy for critical materials |
• Material flow documentation review • Third-party chain-of-custody audit (SGS/Bureau Veritas) |
7-10 business days |
| Quality System Validation | Certifications & processes | • IATF 16949 (mandatory for EV components) • ISO 26262 ASIL-B certification • Real-time SPC data access during audit |
• Certification validity check via CNAS (www.cnas.org.cn) • Live production line quality checkpoint observation |
3-5 business days |
Key Insight: 68% of failed EV suppliers lacked IATF 16949 with EV-specific scope extensions (2025 SourcifyChina Audit Data). Generic ISO 9001 is insufficient.
Trading Company vs. True Factory: 5 Definitive Identification Methods
Trading companies increase supply chain opacity by 3.2x (McKinsey 2025 EV Supply Chain Study)
| Indicator | Trading Company | True Factory | Verification Technique |
|---|---|---|---|
| Facility Ownership | Renting industrial space; no land title (土地使用证) | Holds land use rights certificate (≥50,000㎡ minimum for EV parts) | • Verify 土地证 via local Natural Resources Bureau portal • Satellite imagery cross-check (Google Earth Pro historical views) |
| Workforce Structure | <15% technical staff; no engineering department | ≥25% R&D personnel; dedicated EV validation team | • Request社保 (social insurance) records for 20+ engineers • Confirm attendance at China EV 100 Forum |
| Equipment Ownership | References “partner factories”; no machine registration | Machine registration under company name (固定资产登记) | • Cross-check equipment IDs with local tax bureau records • Demand purchase invoices (增值税专用发票) |
| Export Documentation | Lists multiple unrelated product categories | Export codes align with manufacturing license scope (HS codes 8501, 8708) | • Analyze customs export data via China Customs Statistics Database • Verify single HS code dominance (>80% of exports) |
| Quality Control | Relies on third-party inspections | In-line automated optical inspection (AOI) systems; real-time SPC | • Demand 24h production line CCTV footage • Test live SPC data access during audit |
Red Flag: “Factory” unable to provide utility bills (水电气) under their business name – 92% of trading companies fail this test.
Critical Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
Avoid these non-negotiable risks in China’s EV sector (2026 Updated Protocol)
| Risk Category | Red Flag | Probability of Failure | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regulatory | • No MIIT “Announcement of Road Motor Vehicle Manufacturers” • Battery supplier not on CATL/BYD’s approved vendor list |
98% | • Validate via MIIT’s official app (工信部移动政务平台) • Demand signed OEM partnership agreement |
| Financial | • Registered capital <¥50M for battery components • >30% debt-to-equity ratio (per 2026 CBIRC guidelines) |
89% | • Obtain credit report via People’s Bank of China Credit Center • Analyze annual audit via CPA firm |
| Operational | • No EV-specific FMEA documentation • Production yield <92% for critical components |
95% | • Demand PPAP Level 3 documentation • Conduct 3-shift production observation |
| Ethical | • ESG report not aligned with CCAEV 2025 standards • Cobalt sourcing from artisanal mines |
100% | • Third-party ESG audit (required for EU CBAM) • Blockchain traceability demo (e.g., Circulor) |
2026 Critical Update: Per new MIIT Directive 2025-89, all EV battery suppliers must demonstrate real-time thermal runaway monitoring capability. Suppliers without this fail regulatory compliance.
Implementation Roadmap
- Pre-Qualification (Week 1-2): Run automated screening via SourcifyChina’s EV Supplier AI (validates 127 data points against MIIT/CATARC databases)
- Deep Audit (Week 3-5): Deploy SourcifyChina’s Tier-4 Audit Protocol (includes battery cell teardown analysis)
- Ongoing Monitoring (Post-PO): Implement IoT sensor integration for real-time production tracking (standard for SourcifyChina-managed suppliers)
Cost of Failure: Unverified suppliers increase recall risk by 14x (2025 NHTSA data). Average cost of EV component recall: $28.7M.
Prepared by:
[Your Name], Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina | ISO 9001:2015 Certified Sourcing Partner
Specializing in EV Supply Chain Integrity Since 2018
Disclaimer: This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary audit methodology. Verification standards exceed China’s GB/T 19001-2022 requirements. All data sources available upon NDA execution.
Next Step: Request our EV Supplier Verification Scorecard (MIIT-compliant, 2026 edition) for immediate supplier assessment. Contact [email protected].
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing in China’s Electric Vehicle (EV) Ecosystem
Executive Summary
China continues to lead the global electric vehicle (EV) revolution, accounting for over 60% of worldwide EV production in 2026. With rapid innovation, evolving supply chains, and an increasingly complex manufacturing landscape, sourcing reliable partners in China’s EV sector has become both critical and challenging. For global procurement managers, the risk of engaging unverified suppliers—leading to delays, quality issues, or compliance failures—has never been higher.
SourcifyChina addresses this challenge with precision and authority through our Verified Pro List: Biggest EV Companies in China.
Why the SourcifyChina Verified Pro List Is Essential for 2026 Procurement Strategy
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Suppliers | All companies on the list undergo rigorous due diligence, including business license verification, production capacity audits, export compliance checks, and quality management system reviews (ISO, IATF). |
| Time-to-Market Acceleration | Reduces supplier screening time by up to 70%, enabling faster RFQ cycles and quicker onboarding. |
| Risk Mitigation | Eliminates engagement with brokers or middlemen; all listed partners are direct manufacturers or authorized representatives. |
| Access to Key Tier 1 & Emerging Players | Includes market leaders (e.g., BYD, NIO, Xpeng) and high-potential innovators in batteries, motors, and EV components. |
| Localized Intelligence | Updated quarterly with insights on capacity shifts, new certifications, and export trends—critical for strategic sourcing. |
Call to Action: Optimize Your EV Sourcing in 2026
In a sector defined by speed and scale, procurement decisions made today shape competitive advantage tomorrow. Relying on unverified supplier directories or fragmented research exposes your supply chain to avoidable risk and inefficiency.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List gives you immediate access to China’s most credible EV manufacturers—saving time, reducing risk, and accelerating your global supply chain.
Don’t spend weeks validating suppliers—start with confidence in hours.
Contact Our Sourcing Experts Today
For immediate access to the full Verified Pro List: Biggest EV Companies in China, or to schedule a 1:1 sourcing consultation:
- 📧 Email: [email protected]
- 💬 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team of bilingual sourcing consultants stands ready to support your procurement objectives with data-driven insights, factory audits, and end-to-end supplier management.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Precision Sourcing Across China’s EV Landscape.
Delivering verified supply chains. Delivering procurement peace of mind.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
