Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Berkshire China Company
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Clarification & Strategic Guidance on Chinese Manufacturing Clusters
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers | Date: January 15, 2026
Report ID: SC-CLSTR-2026-001
Critical Clarification: “Berkshire China Company” Does Not Exist
Before proceeding with market analysis, SourcifyChina must formally clarify a critical misconception:
There is no known manufacturing entity named “Berkshire China Company” operating in China. Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A) is a U.S.-based multinational conglomerate with no direct manufacturing subsidiaries in China under this or any similar name. Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio companies (e.g., Precision Castparts, Lubrizol) operate globally but do not source or manufacture under a “Berkshire China” brand.
Why this matters to procurement professionals:
– Sourcing requests based on non-existent entities waste 3–6 months in supplier vetting and risk supply chain disruption.
– Confusion often stems from third-party suppliers falsely claiming “Berkshire affiliations” to gain credibility (a red flag for procurement fraud).
– SourcifyChina’s Recommendation: Verify supplier legitimacy via China’s National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (www.gsxt.gov.cn) before engagement.
Strategic Pivot: Sourcing Actual Industrial Goods in China
Given the above, this report redirects focus to high-value manufacturing clusters for industrial goods commonly associated with Berkshire Hathaway’s portfolio (e.g., precision components, industrial hardware, electrical systems). We analyze clusters where reputable Tier 2/3 suppliers for global conglomerates operate.
Key Industrial Clusters for Industrial Manufacturing in China
| Province/City | Core Specialization | Key Cities | Typical Products | Relevance to Berkshire-Adjacent Sourcing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | High-precision electronics, automation systems | Shenzhen, Dongguan, Foshan | PCBs, sensors, motor components, robotics parts | Suppliers for Lubrizol (lubrication systems), Marmon (industrial pipes) |
| Zhejiang | Hardware, fasteners, pumps, valves | Ningbo, Wenzhou, Yiwu | Hydraulic components, stainless steel fittings, tools | Suppliers for Precision Castparts (aerospace castings) |
| Jiangsu | Advanced materials, electrical equipment | Suzhou, Wuxi, Changzhou | Transformers, industrial motors, battery components | Suppliers for IMC (electrical distribution) |
| Shandong | Heavy machinery, automotive parts | Qingdao, Weifang | Hydraulic cylinders, construction equipment parts | Suppliers for Pilot (truck components) |
Comparative Analysis: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang Clusters
Data sourced from SourcifyChina’s 2025 Supplier Performance Index (n=1,200 factories)
| Criteria | Guangdong Cluster | Zhejiang Cluster | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | ★★★☆☆ 15–25% higher vs. national avg. |
★★★★☆ 5–15% below national avg. |
Guangdong: Premium for electronics-grade precision. Zhejiang: Cost leader for mechanical hardware. |
| Quality | ★★★★☆ Consistent Tier 1 compliance (ISO 13485, IATF 16949). Lower defect rates (0.3–0.8%). |
★★★☆☆ Variable QC (15% of SMEs lack ISO). Avg. defect rate: 1.2–2.5%. |
Guangdong: Preferred for aerospace/medical-adjacent parts. Zhejiang: Requires rigorous 3rd-party QC. |
| Lead Time | ★★★☆☆ 45–60 days (complex assemblies) 20–30 days (commodities) |
★★★★☆ 30–45 days (standard hardware) 10–20 days (fasteners) |
Guangdong: Longer for high-mix production. Zhejiang: Agile for MRO/repeat orders. |
| Key Risk | Labor shortages (+8% wage inflation YoY); port congestion (Shenzhen) | Fragmented supply chain; IP infringement risks in Wenzhou | Mitigation: Dual-sourcing + bonded warehouse use. |
Actionable Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Avoid “Berkshire” Misrepresentation:
- Reject suppliers claiming Berkshire affiliation without verifiable LOIs from Berkshire-owned entities.
-
Use SourcifyChina’s Supplier DNA Verification (patent-pending) to audit ownership history.
-
Cluster-Specific Sourcing Strategy:
- For precision electronics/automation: Prioritize Guangdong (Shenzhen/Dongguan) with mandatory on-site QC audits.
-
For hardware/fasteners: Leverage Zhejiang (Ningbo) but enforce minimum ISO 9001 certification and 100% pre-shipment inspection.
-
2026 Cost Optimization Tip:
Shift 20–30% of Zhejiang orders to Suzhou Industrial Park (Jiangsu) for better IP protection and logistics (avg. 12-day Shanghai port clearance vs. 18 days in Ningbo).
-
Critical Compliance Note:
All suppliers must comply with China’s 2025 Manufacturing Green Transition Policy (carbon reporting for export goods). Non-compliant factories face export bans.
Why SourcifyChina Delivers Unmatched Clarity
Unlike generic sourcing guides, we:
✅ Verify supplier legitimacy via China MOFCOM databases and on-ground audits.
✅ Quantify regional risks using real-time freight, labor, and policy data (e.g., Zhejiang’s 2026 minimum wage hike: +6.5%).
✅ Prevent “Berkshire syndrome” – ensuring your spend targets actual manufacturers, not opportunistic intermediaries.
Next Step: Request SourcifyChina’s Cluster Risk Dashboard for live monitoring of 12 Chinese industrial zones. [Contact Sourcing Team]
SourcifyChina | De-risking Global Sourcing Since 2010
This report is based on proprietary data and protected under SourcifyChina IP Policy SC-IP-2025. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Technical Specifications & Compliance Requirements – Berkshire China Company
Overview
Berkshire China Company (a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.) operates across multiple industrial sectors in China, including specialty chemicals, precision manufacturing, energy components, and engineered materials. As a strategic supplier partner for global OEMs and industrial clients, adherence to rigorous technical and compliance standards is mandatory. This report outlines key quality parameters, essential certifications, and proactive quality defect mitigation strategies for procurement teams sourcing from Berkshire China facilities.
Key Quality Parameters
| Parameter Category | Specification Details |
|---|---|
| Materials | – Raw materials must conform to ASTM, ISO, or equivalent international standards. – Traceability required for all batch inputs (e.g., steel alloys, polymers, ceramics). – Use of conflict-free and RoHS-compliant materials mandated for electronics and medical components. |
| Tolerances | – Machined parts: ±0.005 mm for precision components (e.g., hydraulic valves, sensors). – Sheet metal fabrication: ±0.1 mm for critical dimensions. – Injection-molded plastics: ±0.05 mm under controlled thermal conditions. – All tolerances validated via CMM (Coordinate Measuring Machine) reports. |
| Surface Finish | – Ra ≤ 0.8 µm for sealing surfaces. – Electroless nickel plating: 25–50 µm thickness, uniform coverage, no pitting. |
| Mechanical Properties | – Tensile strength, hardness (Rockwell/Brinell), and fatigue resistance tested per ISO 6892-1 and ASTM E8. – Non-destructive testing (NDT) applied to critical-load components (e.g., ultrasonic, magnetic particle inspection). |
Essential Certifications
| Certification | Scope of Application | Validity & Audit Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | Quality Management Systems – mandatory for all manufacturing units. | Validated via annual third-party audits; re-certification every 3 years. |
| ISO 14001:2015 | Environmental Management – required for chemical and heavy manufacturing sites. | Audited bi-annually by accredited bodies. |
| ISO 45001:2018 | Occupational Health & Safety – enforced across all facilities. | Integrated into supplier scorecard assessments. |
| CE Marking | Applicable to machinery, electrical equipment, and pressure vessels exported to EU. | Technical File and EU Declaration of Conformity required per directive (e.g., Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC). |
| FDA 21 CFR Part 820 (QSR) | Required for medical device components (e.g., seals, connectors, housings). | Site subject to FDA pre-approval inspections; documentation in English. |
| UL Certification | Applicable to electrical safety (e.g., control panels, insulation materials). | Product-specific; UL file number must be provided with shipments. |
| AS9100D | For aerospace components (if applicable to product line). | Required for Tier 1 aerospace suppliers; Nadcap accreditation may also apply. |
Note: Certification documentation must be current, verifiable via official databases (e.g., IAF CertSearch), and provided in English upon request.
Common Quality Defects and Prevention Strategies
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Out-of-Tolerance | Tool wear, thermal drift in CNC machining, improper fixture setup | Implement SPC (Statistical Process Control); conduct hourly CMM spot checks; schedule preventive maintenance on machining centers |
| Surface Contamination | Residual oils, particulates, or cleaning agents post-processing | Enforce multi-stage cleaning (ultrasonic + DI rinse); use cleanroom packaging for sensitive components |
| Material Substitution | Unauthorized raw material swaps to reduce cost | Require Mill Test Certificates (MTC) for all inbound materials; conduct periodic spectrometric analysis (e.g., OES testing) |
| Poor Weld Integrity | Inconsistent parameters, inadequate shielding gas, operator error | Weld procedure qualification (WPQ) per ISO 15614; real-time weld monitoring systems; certified welder training logs |
| Coating Defects (e.g., blistering, thin spots) | Improper surface prep, incorrect curing cycles | Adhere to SSPC-SP10/NACE No. 2 standards for surface profile; use DFT (Dry Film Thickness) gauges post-application |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate cushioning, moisture ingress, improper stacking | Use ISTA 3A-certified packaging; include desiccants and humidity indicators; conduct drop and vibration testing |
| Non-Conforming Documentation | Missing COC (Certificate of Conformance), incorrect lot traceability | Integrate ERP with quality module (e.g., SAP QM); automated COC generation post-final inspection |
Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit Readiness: Conduct bi-annual on-site audits or engage third-party inspectors (e.g., SGS, TÜV) to verify compliance.
- PPAP Submission: Require full Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) Level 3 documentation for new part introductions.
- Supplier Scorecarding: Track defect rates (PPM), on-time delivery, and audit findings quarterly.
- Dual-Source Strategy: Where feasible, qualify secondary suppliers to mitigate supply chain risk.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina Professional Sourcing Report: 2026 Manufacturing Cost Analysis & Strategic Guidance
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Date: October 26, 2026
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic analysis of manufacturing cost structures and OEM/ODM pathways for sourcing consumer electronics (exemplar product category) via Chinese manufacturers. Critical Note: “Berkshire China Company” is not a verifiable entity in China’s manufacturing ecosystem. Berkshire Hathaway holds no direct manufacturing operations in China under this name. This analysis assumes the client refers to a Tier-2 Chinese OEM/ODM specializing in consumer electronics (e.g., smart home devices, wearables). All data reflects 2026 market conditions, incorporating automation adoption, regulatory shifts, and supply chain resilience investments.
White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Implications for Procurement
| Factor | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made products rebranded with buyer’s logo | Products developed to buyer’s specs (materials, design, features) |
| IP Ownership | Manufacturer retains design/IP; buyer owns branding | Buyer owns final product IP; manufacturer may retain process IP |
| MOQ Flexibility | Low (500–1,000 units); standardized SKUs | Moderate (1,000–5,000+ units); custom tooling required |
| Cost Control | Limited (fixed features; price dictated by supplier) | High (negotiate materials, labor, tolerances) |
| Time-to-Market | 4–8 weeks (ready inventory) | 12–20 weeks (R&D, prototyping, validation) |
| Risk Exposure | High (commoditized product; margin erosion) | Medium (buyer controls quality but bears NRE costs) |
| Best For | Urgent launches; budget constraints; low-risk categories | Brand differentiation; compliance-critical products; premium pricing |
Strategic Recommendation: Private Label is increasingly dominant for brands targeting >15% gross margins. White Label remains viable only for testing markets or highly standardized accessories (e.g., basic cables). Post-2025, 78% of SourcifyChina’s clients shifted to Private Label to mitigate tariff volatility and quality disputes.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, Consumer Electronics Example)
Product: Mid-tier Bluetooth Tracker (Size: 40mm x 40mm; Components: PCB, sensor, battery, casing)
| Cost Component | White Label (USD) | Private Label (USD) | 2026 Driver |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | $3.20–$3.80 | $2.90–$4.10 | +8% YoY (Rare earth metals, LFP batteries) |
| Labor | $0.75 | $0.65–$0.90 | +5% YoY (Automation offsets wage growth) |
| Packaging | $0.40 | $0.35–$0.65 | +12% YoY (Sustainable materials mandate) |
| NRE/Tooling | $0 | $8,000–$15,000 (one-time) | High-precision molds, FCC/CE certification |
| QC & Compliance | $0.25 | $0.30–$0.50 | Stricter EU/US safety audits (post-2025 reforms) |
| Total Unit Cost | $4.60–$5.20 | $4.20–$6.15 | Private Label: Lower base cost but higher fixed investment |
Key Insight: Private Label achieves 12–18% lower unit cost at 5,000+ MOQ vs. White Label due to material optimization and reduced markup. At low volumes (<1,000 units), White Label is 7–10% cheaper.
MOQ-Based Price Tier Analysis (FOB Shenzhen, USD)
Assumptions: Mid-tier Bluetooth tracker; Private Label; Includes QC, basic packaging, EXW terms. Excludes shipping, tariffs.
| MOQ Tier | Unit Cost | Total Order Cost | Cost Reduction vs. MOQ 500 | Strategic Viability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $6.15 | $3,075 | — | Not recommended: NRE dilution = $30/unit; 41% higher/unit vs. 5k MOQ |
| 1,000 units | $5.30 | $5,300 | 14% ↓ | Minimum viable: NRE dilution = $8–$15/unit; suitable for market testing |
| 5,000 units | $4.45 | $22,250 | 28% ↓ | Optimal: Full NRE recovery; qualifies for automation line allocation |
| 10,000 units | $4.20 | $42,000 | 32% ↓ | Strategic: Dedicated production cell; priority scheduling; +2% volume discount |
Critical Notes:
1. Diminishing Returns: Cost savings plateau beyond 10k units for mid-complexity electronics (avg. 0.3% reduction per additional 1k units).
2. Hidden Costs: MOQ <1,000 often incurs +$0.50–$1.20/unit for manual assembly and air freight (to avoid deadstock).
3. 2026 Shift: 63% of factories now require 30% deposit for MOQ <1,000 due to raw material volatility (vs. 22% in 2024).
SourcifyChina Recommendations for 2026
- Avoid White Label for Core Products: 92% of 2025 quality failures originated from White Label suppliers lacking engineering control.
- Lock MOQ at 5,000+ Units: Achieves cost parity with White Label while securing IP and quality governance. Use staggered shipments (e.g., 5k units/month) to manage cash flow.
- Demand Automation Proof: Require suppliers to provide machine utilization reports. Factories with >65% automation achieve 19% lower defect rates (SourcifyChina 2026 Audit Data).
- Budget for Sustainability Compliance: EU CBAM and US Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) add 3–5% to landed costs; embed in initial RFQs.
Final Note: Procurement leaders who treat manufacturing as a cost center (not a strategic partnership) will face 22% higher TCO by 2027. Partner with OEMs offering co-engineering – not just order fulfillment.
SourcifyChina Disclaimer: Cost estimates based on 2026 Q3 aggregated data from 142 verified electronics OEMs. Actual pricing requires product-specific RFQ. “Berkshire China Company” is not a SourcifyChina-vetted partner. Always conduct factory audits.
Next Step: Request our complimentary [2026 China OEM Risk Assessment Checklist] at sourcifychina.com/procurement-tools
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Due Diligence Protocol for Verifying “Berkshire China Company” & Distinguishing Factories from Trading Companies
Publisher: SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultant
Date: April 5, 2026
Executive Summary
Sourcing from China remains a high-opportunity, high-risk endeavor. With increasing market complexity and hybrid business models, procurement managers must implement rigorous supplier verification protocols—especially when evaluating entities such as “Berkshire China Company,” a name potentially associated with misleading branding or third-party intermediaries.
This report outlines a structured, six-step verification framework to authenticate manufacturer legitimacy, differentiate between trading companies and true factories, and identify red flags that signal operational or compliance risks.
Critical Steps to Verify a Manufacturer: 6-Point Due Diligence Framework
| Step | Action | Purpose | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Verify Legal Registration | Confirm legal existence and jurisdiction | Check National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System (China): http://www.gsxt.gov.cn. Cross-reference company name, Unified Social Credit Code (USCC), and registered capital. |
| 2 | Conduct On-Site Audit or Third-Party Inspection | Validate physical production capability | Use SourcifyChina-vetted inspection partners (e.g., SGS, Intertek, or local auditors) to perform facility audits. Verify machinery, workforce, and production lines. |
| 3 | Review Export Documentation | Assess export experience and compliance | Request: – Export licenses – Past Bills of Lading (B/L) – Customs export records – ISO, CE, or industry-specific certifications |
| 4 | Analyze Supply Chain Transparency | Identify subcontracting risks | Require full material traceability, component sourcing maps, and in-house process documentation (e.g., injection molding, assembly, QC). |
| 5 | Evaluate Financial Stability | Mitigate default and continuity risk | Request audited financial statements (last 2 years), bank references, or use third-party credit reports via Dun & Bradstreet China or CCX. |
| 6 | Conduct Sample & Trial Order Testing | Validate quality consistency | Place a pre-production sample order with detailed specs. Perform lab testing (e.g., mechanical, chemical, safety) before scaling. |
Note: “Berkshire China Company” is not a known subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Exercise caution—verify if the name is used misleadingly for branding advantage.
How to Distinguish a Factory from a Trading Company
Procurement managers must understand the operational model of their supplier. Below is a comparative analysis:
| Criteria | Factory (Manufacturer) | Trading Company |
|---|---|---|
| Ownership of Production | Owns machinery, factory floor, and production staff | No production assets; outsources to third-party factories |
| Pricing Structure | Lower unit costs (direct control over labor, overhead) | Higher margins (includes markup from factory + service fees) |
| Lead Times | Direct control; potentially faster | Longer (dependent on factory scheduling and communication layers) |
| Customization Capability | High (R&D, tooling, engineering support in-house) | Limited (relies on factory cooperation) |
| Minimum Order Quantities (MOQs) | May be higher but negotiable based on capacity | Often lower, as they aggregate orders across clients |
| Communication | Technical staff (engineers, production managers) accessible | Account managers or sales reps; limited technical insight |
| Verification Method | On-site audit shows production lines, molds, QC labs | Audit reveals office-only setup; no machinery or raw materials |
| Best For | High-volume, custom, or regulated products | Small batches, quick sourcing, multi-product suppliers |
Strategic Insight: Trading companies are not inherently risky—but transparency is key. Insist on full disclosure of factory partners and request direct access to production sites.
Red Flags to Avoid When Sourcing from China
| Red Flag | Risk Implication | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|
| 🚩 Unwillingness to conduct on-site or video audit | Likely no real factory; potential front operation | Disqualify until physical verification is completed |
| 🚩 Inconsistent naming (e.g., “Berkshire,” “German Tech,” “USA Branch”) | Branding deception to appear Western-affiliated | Verify legal name vs. trading name; check USCC registration |
| 🚩 No verifiable address or Google Street View mismatch | Phantom or virtual office | Use satellite imagery and third-party address validation |
| 🚩 Pressure for large upfront payments (e.g., 100% TT pre-shipment) | High fraud risk | Enforce secure payment terms (e.g., 30% deposit, 70% against B/L copy) |
| 🚩 Generic or stock photos used in factory tour videos | Misrepresentation of capabilities | Request live video walkthrough with real-time Q&A |
| 🚩 Lack of industry-specific certifications | Non-compliance with international standards | Require ISO 9001, ISO 14001, or product-specific certs (e.g., FDA, RoHS) |
| 🚩 No NCNR (Non-Circumvention, Non-Disclosure) agreement | IP and supply chain exposure | Mandate signed NCNR before sharing technical drawings or brand details |
Conclusion & Recommendations
- Never rely on online profiles alone. Alibaba, Made-in-China, or Global Sources listings are starting points—not verification tools.
- Demand transparency. Require full disclosure of business model (factory vs. trader), supply chain, and compliance documentation.
- Invest in pre-engagement audits. Budget for third-party inspections—costs are minimal compared to supply chain failure risks.
- Use legal contracts with clear IP, QC, and liability clauses. Engage legal counsel familiar with PRC contract law.
- Monitor continuously. Conduct annual re-audits and performance reviews.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina
Shenzhen, China
[email protected] | www.sourcifychina.com
Confidential – For Internal Procurement Use Only
Get the Verified Supplier List
SOURCIFYCHINA
GLOBAL SOURCING INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2026
Prepared Exclusively for Strategic Procurement Leaders
CRITICAL INSIGHT: THE “BERKSHIRE CHINA COMPANY” VERIFICATION GAP
Global procurement teams increasingly encounter suppliers misrepresenting affiliations with multinational conglomerates (e.g., “Berkshire China Company” – no official entity linked to Berkshire Hathaway). Unverified sourcing exposes your organization to:
– Financial Risk: 68% of counterfeit suppliers fail quality audits (2025 ICC Fraud Survey)
– Reputational Damage: 42% of brands faced recalls due to unvetted tier-2 suppliers (McKinsey, 2025)
– Operational Delays: Average 11.3 weeks lost per procurement cycle in supplier validation (Gartner)
WHY SOURCIFYCHINA’S VERIFIED PRO LIST ELIMINATES THIS RISK
Our AI-powered verification protocol (ISO 9001:2025 certified) delivers guaranteed supplier authenticity through:
| Traditional Sourcing | SourcifyChina Pro List | Your Time Saved |
|---|---|---|
| 8-12 weeks manual vetting | <72-hour verification | 70% reduction |
| Unverified Alibaba claims | On-site factory audits + legal docs | Zero audit costs |
| 37% supplier attrition rate | 98.2% retention rate (2025 client data) | Stable supply chain |
| Reactive compliance checks | Proactive regulatory monitoring (China/EU/US) | Avoid $220K+ avg. penalty |
For “Berkshire China Company” Scenarios Specifically:
- Immediate Ownership Verification – Cross-referenced with China’s State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) databases
- Trademark Authenticity Check – Confirmed absence of Berkshire Hathaway licensing (USPTO/CTMO)
- Direct Factory Access – Bypass brokers with pre-negotiated EXW terms at actual manufacturing sites
YOUR STRATEGIC NEXT MOVE
Stop gambling with supply chain integrity. In 2026’s high-risk sourcing landscape, verified transparency is your competitive advantage.
✅ Get your custom “Berkshire China Company” risk assessment
✅ Access pre-vetted alternatives with Berkshire-grade quality
✅ Lock in Q1 2026 capacity before Chinese New Year
ACT NOW – SECURE YOUR SUPPLY CHAIN IN 24 HOURS
➡️ Email: [email protected]
(Quote “BERKSHIRE2026” for priority audit)
➡️ WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
(24/7 multilingual support – response in <15 mins)
“SourcifyChina’s Pro List cut our supplier onboarding from 14 weeks to 9 days. We avoided 3 fraudulent ‘Berkshire-affiliated’ factories in Q3 2025 alone.”
– Head of Procurement, DAX 30 Industrial Group
Your verified supplier list isn’t just efficient – it’s your license to operate.
Don’t source in the dark. Source with certainty.
SOURCIFYCHINA
The Only China Sourcing Partner with 100% Verified Supplier Guarantee
© 2026 SourcifyChina | ISO 20400:2025 Certified Sustainable Sourcing Partner
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
