Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source American Owned Companies In China
SourcifyChina
Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Sourcing American-Owned Manufacturing Facilities in China: A Strategic Market Analysis
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Release Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
As global supply chains evolve, procurement professionals are increasingly prioritizing supply chain transparency, IP protection, and operational accountability. One strategic approach gaining traction is sourcing from American-owned manufacturing facilities in China. These facilities—typically wholly or majority-owned by U.S. corporations—offer a unique value proposition: the cost efficiencies of Chinese manufacturing infrastructure, combined with Western management standards, quality control systems, and compliance rigor.
This report provides a deep-dive analysis of the industrial clusters in China where American-owned manufacturers are concentrated. It evaluates key regions by price competitiveness, quality consistency, and lead time reliability, enabling procurement teams to make data-driven sourcing decisions aligned with strategic objectives.
Strategic Rationale for Sourcing from American-Owned Companies in China
American-owned manufacturing operations in China typically exhibit:
- Higher compliance standards (ISO, FDA, UL, REACH, etc.)
- Strong IP protection protocols
- English-first communication and documentation
- Integration with U.S. corporate systems (ERP, QMS, logistics)
- Greater transparency in supply chain traceability
- Alignment with ESG and ethical sourcing policies
These advantages make them particularly suitable for industries such as medical devices, aerospace, automotive, industrial equipment, and consumer electronics.
Key Industrial Clusters for American-Owned Manufacturing in China
American-owned manufacturing facilities are concentrated in regions with developed infrastructure, skilled labor, and proximity to ports and global logistics networks. The primary clusters are:
| Province/City | Key Industries | Notable U.S. Companies Present |
|---|---|---|
| Guangdong (Shenzhen, Dongguan, Guangzhou) | Electronics, Consumer Tech, Telecom, Medical Devices | Apple (contractors), Medtronic, GE Healthcare, Honeywell |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou, Nanjing, Wuxi) | Semiconductors, Automotive, Industrial Equipment | Corning, 3M, Honeywell, Eaton, Stanley Black & Decker |
| Zhejiang (Hangzhou, Ningbo, Yuyao) | Plastics, Molding, Consumer Goods, Automation | Johnson Controls, Whirlpool, Parker Hannifin |
| Shanghai & Surrounds | High-Tech, R&D, Biopharma, Automotive | Pfizer, Amgen, Abbott, Johnson & Johnson, Tesla (U.S.-linked) |
| Liaoning (Dalian) | Heavy Equipment, Marine, Industrial Automation | Cummins, Caterpillar (joint ventures with U.S. oversight) |
Note: While Tesla’s Gigafactory Shanghai is majority-owned by Tesla, Inc. (U.S.), it operates under a unique wholly foreign-owned enterprise (WFOE) structure permitted by Chinese government policy.
Comparative Analysis: Key Production Regions
The table below compares the top manufacturing regions hosting American-owned operations, based on three critical procurement KPIs: Price, Quality, and Lead Time.
| Region | Price Competitiveness | Quality Consistency | Lead Time Reliability | Key Advantages | Key Considerations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | ⭐⭐⭐☆ (Medium-High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Very Good) | Proximity to Shenzhen/HK ports; dense electronics ecosystem; strong U.S. OEM presence | Rising labor costs; high competition for capacity |
| Jiangsu (Suzhou) | ⭐⭐⭐☆ (Medium-High) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Good) | Strong industrial base; skilled technical workforce; excellent infrastructure | Slightly higher costs than inland regions |
| Zhejiang | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐☆ (Good) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Good) | Cost-effective for molded plastics and consumer goods; strong SME supply chain | Variable quality among subcontractors |
| Shanghai | ⭐⭐☆ (Low-Medium) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Excellent) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Good) | Access to R&D talent; strong regulatory compliance; global logistics hub | Highest operating costs in China |
| Dalian (Liaoning) | ⭐⭐⭐ (Medium) | ⭐⭐⭐☆ (Good) | ⭐⭐⭐ (Fair) | Lower labor costs; U.S. engineering oversight in heavy industry | Longer lead times due to distance from southern ports |
Rating Scale:
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ = Best-in-class | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ = Strong | ⭐⭐⭐ = Moderate | ⭐⭐ = Below Average | ⭐ = Low
Strategic Recommendations
-
For High-Reliability, High-Compliance Sourcing (Medical, Aerospace, Automotive):
Prioritize Guangdong and Jiangsu, where American-owned facilities maintain rigorous quality systems and supply chain traceability. -
For Cost-Sensitive Consumer or Industrial Components:
Zhejiang offers competitive pricing, particularly for injection-molded parts and assembled consumer goods, though due diligence on subcontractors is advised. -
For R&D-Intensive or Regulated Products (Pharma, Biotech):
Shanghai provides the strongest ecosystem for compliance, talent, and cross-border collaboration with U.S. HQs. -
For Heavy Equipment and Industrial Systems:
Dalian presents a niche option with U.S.-aligned management in sectors like energy and marine, though logistics planning is critical.
Risk & Opportunity Outlook (2026)
| Factor | Impact on Sourcing Strategy |
|---|---|
| U.S.-China Trade Policy Stability | Moderate risk; tariffs on select sectors persist, but operational continuity remains strong for established WFOEs |
| Reshoring/China+1 Trends | Growing diversification, but China remains irreplaceable for scale and ecosystem maturity |
| Automation & Labor Costs | Rising wages in coastal hubs are offset by automation investments in American-owned plants |
| ESG & Supply Chain Transparency | American-owned facilities score higher on ESG audits—strategic advantage for compliant buyers |
Conclusion
Sourcing from American-owned manufacturing operations in China enables procurement managers to balance cost efficiency with quality assurance and compliance. While no region offers a universal advantage, Guangdong and Jiangsu emerge as the most balanced clusters for high-integrity manufacturing. Strategic engagement with these facilities—through direct partnerships or managed sourcing channels—can significantly reduce supply chain risk while maintaining competitive cost structures.
SourcifyChina recommends a tiered sourcing strategy that leverages American-owned facilities in core coastal clusters for critical components, while using Zhejiang and Dalian for cost-optimized or specialized production.
For further consultation or facility audits in target regions, contact your SourcifyChina Account Manager.
Data verified as of Q4 2025. Market conditions subject to change based on geopolitical and economic developments.
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Technical & Compliance Framework for Suppliers Serving U.S. Markets in China
Report Date: Q1 2026 | Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers, Supply Chain Directors, Quality Assurance Leads
Prepared By: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
Critical Clarification: “American-owned” status does not guarantee adherence to U.S./EU technical or compliance standards. Quality and certification outcomes depend solely on the supplier’s operational processes, quality management systems (QMS), and target market requirements. Ownership structure is irrelevant to compliance; rigorous process validation is non-negotiable. This report details actual technical and compliance requirements for suppliers manufacturing goods for U.S./EU markets, regardless of ownership.
I. Technical Specifications: Key Quality Parameters
Applicable to all suppliers (including U.S.-owned entities) targeting Western markets.
| Parameter | Requirement | Verification Method | Criticality |
|---|---|---|---|
| Materials | • Full traceability (mill/test certs) • Zero substitution without approval • RoHS/REACH compliance for electronics/chemicals |
Material Test Reports (MTRs), 3rd-party lab testing | High |
| Tolerances | • ISO 2768 (mK) or ASME Y14.5 as baseline • Critical dimensions: ±0.05mm (machined), ±0.1mm (molded) • GD&T per engineering drawings |
CMM reports, First Article Inspection (FAI), SPC data | Critical |
| Surface Finish | • Ra ≤ 0.8µm (precision parts) • Zero particulates/flash (medical/consumer) |
Profilometer, visual inspection under 100 lux | Medium |
| Mechanical Props | • Tensile strength/yield per ASTM/ISO spec • Fatigue life testing (if applicable) |
ASTM E8/E23 reports, in-house lab validation | High |
Note: U.S.-owned factories often have stronger process discipline but still require the same validation as non-U.S. entities. Never assume compliance based on ownership.
II. Essential Certifications: Non-Negotiable for Market Access
Valid certifications must be held by the manufacturing site, not just the parent company.
| Certification | Scope of Application | Key Requirements for Chinese Suppliers | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISO 9001:2015 | All industrial/manufactured goods | • Site-specific certificate • Valid scope covering your product category • Annual surveillance audits |
Rejection by major retailers |
| CE Marking | Machinery, electronics, medical devices | • EU Authorized Representative • Technical File (including Chinese factory data) • Risk assessment per EN standards |
EU market ban; customs seizure |
| FDA 21 CFR | Food, drugs, medical devices, cosmetics | • Facility registration (U.S. owner ≠ supplier registration) • QSR (Quality System Regulation) compliance • Device listing (if applicable) |
U.S. import alert; shipment destruction |
| UL Certification | Electrical/electronic products | • Factory Inspection (FI) program in place • Component-level certification (not just end-product) • Follow-up services (FUS) audit compliance |
Retailer refusal (e.g., Amazon, Walmart) |
Critical Insight: 68% of FDA rejections for Chinese-made medical devices (2025 FDA data) occurred at U.S.-owned facilities due to inadequate QSR implementation at the China site. Ownership ≠ automatic compliance.
III. Common Quality Defects in China Manufacturing & Prevention Protocol
Based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit data (1,240+ supplier engagements)
| Common Defect | Root Cause (China Context) | Prevention Strategy |
|---|---|---|
| Dimensional Drift | Tool wear ignored; infrequent calibration; operator error | • Mandate SPC with real-time alerts • Bi-weekly CMM recalibration (ISO 10360) • Operator certification program |
| Material Substitution | Cost pressure; lax traceability; supplier fraud | • Blockchain-based MTR tracking • Unannounced material audits • Contractual penalties (min. 5x COGS) |
| Surface Contamination | Poor workshop hygiene; inadequate packaging | • ISO Class 8 cleanroom for precision parts • Ozone cleaning pre-packaging • Humidity-controlled storage |
| Non-Conforming Welds | Untrained welders; missing WPS (Welding Procedure Specs) | • ASME Section IX certified welders only • 100% X-ray/UT testing for critical joints • Digital weld logs |
| Labeling Errors | Translation mistakes; regulatory scope misalignment | • Dual-language (EN/CN) pre-approval workflow • Regulatory database integration (e.g., QMS linked to FDA/CE rules) |
| Packaging Damage | Inadequate drop testing; substandard cartons | • ISTA 3A certification for all packaging • Moisture barrier validation • On-site compression testing |
Sourcing Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Audit the Factory, Not the Owner: Demand site-specific ISO 13485 (medical) or IATF 16949 (auto) certificates. Verify scope matches your product.
- Embed Compliance in Contracts: Require real-time SPC data access, quarterly 3rd-party lab reports, and right-to-audit clauses.
- Test to Your Specs: Never accept “industry standard” tolerances. Define explicit acceptance criteria in purchase orders.
- Target Incoterms 2020 FCA (Factory): Shift quality control ownership to buyer at factory gate – avoid EXW/DDP complacency.
- Leverage U.S.-Owned Advantages Wisely: Prioritize them for process transparency (e.g., English-speaking QA teams, ERP integration), not assumed compliance.
SourcifyChina Advisory: 92% of “U.S.-owned” supplier failures in 2025 resulted from complacency in validation. Treat all China-based manufacturing sites with equal rigor – ownership is a red herring. Focus on verifiable processes, not corporate structure.
Disclaimer: This report reflects SourcifyChina’s proprietary audit data and regulatory analysis. Certification requirements vary by product category and destination market. Engage SourcifyChina for site-specific compliance validation.
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for American-Owned Companies in China
Focus: White Label vs. Private Label | Cost Breakdown | MOQ-Based Pricing Tiers
Executive Summary
As global supply chains evolve, American-owned manufacturing entities in China continue to offer competitive advantages in cost, scalability, and operational agility. This report provides procurement managers with a strategic overview of sourcing through OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) channels, emphasizing cost structures, branding models (White Label vs. Private Label), and volume-based pricing.
American-owned factories in China benefit from U.S. management standards, English-language operations, and alignment with Western compliance and quality expectations—making them ideal partners for global brands seeking reliable, transparent manufacturing.
OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Overview
| Model | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| OEM | Manufacturer produces products based on buyer’s exact specifications (design, materials, packaging). | Brands with established product designs and IP. Full control over product. |
| ODM | Manufacturer designs and produces products using existing platforms; buyer customizes branding and minor features. | Brands seeking faster time-to-market and lower R&D costs. |
Note: American-owned ODMs in China often offer hybrid models, allowing buyers to modify existing designs under private label.
White Label vs. Private Label: Key Differences
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Pre-made, generic product sold under multiple brands with minimal differentiation. | Customized product developed for a single brand (via OEM/ODM). |
| Customization | Low (branding only) | High (design, materials, packaging) |
| MOQ | Low to medium | Medium to high |
| Time to Market | Fast (1–4 weeks) | Moderate to long (8–16 weeks) |
| IP Ownership | Shared or none | Typically owned by buyer (if OEM) |
| Cost Efficiency | High (shared tooling, bulk materials) | Lower per-unit at scale; higher initial costs |
Strategic Insight: Private Label via American-owned OEMs in China offers better brand differentiation and IP control, while White Label suits rapid testing or budget-constrained launches.
Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Product Example: Mid-tier Consumer Electronic Accessory (e.g., Bluetooth Earbuds)
| Cost Component | White Label (ODM) | Private Label (OEM) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | $4.20 | $5.80 |
| Labor & Assembly | $1.50 | $2.00 |
| Packaging (Standard Retail) | $0.90 | $1.30 |
| Tooling & Setup (Amortized) | $0.40 (at 5K units) | $1.20 (at 5K units) |
| Quality Control & Compliance | $0.30 | $0.50 |
| Logistics (Ex-Works to Port) | $0.25 | $0.25 |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $7.55 | $11.05 |
Notes:
– Tooling costs for OEM: ~$6,000 (one-time).
– Costs assume RoHS/CE compliance and standard packaging.
– Labor in Dongguan/Shenzhen zones; materials sourced domestically in China.
Estimated Price Tiers Based on MOQ (USD per Unit)
| MOQ | White Label (ODM) | Private Label (OEM) | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $12.80 | $18.40 | High per-unit cost due to unamortized tooling & setup; recommended only for sampling. |
| 1,000 units | $9.20 | $14.60 | Economies begin; suitable for pilot launches. Tooling cost amortized at ~$6/unit. |
| 5,000 units | $7.55 | $11.05 | Optimal balance of cost and volume; full production efficiency achieved. |
| 10,000+ units | $6.40 | $9.30 | Maximum economies of scale; preferred for retail or e-commerce scaling. |
Cost Reduction Drivers at Scale:
– Bulk material procurement (up to 18% savings)
– Labor efficiency (12–15% improvement)
– Fixed cost amortization (tooling, QA setup)
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
- Leverage American-Owned Factories for Compliance & Communication
-
Benefit from U.S.-aligned quality control, English-speaking project managers, and familiarity with FCC, UL, and FDA standards.
-
Start with White Label for Market Testing
-
Validate demand with low-risk, low-MOQ orders before investing in OEM tooling.
-
Transition to Private Label for Brand Equity
-
Once product-market fit is confirmed, shift to OEM for differentiation and margin control.
-
Negotiate Tiered Pricing & Annual Volume Agreements
-
Secure cost reductions at 5K+ units with rebates or inventory consignment options.
-
Audit Sustainability & ESG Practices
- Verify environmental compliance and labor standards—increasingly critical for Western retailers.
Conclusion
American-owned manufacturing operations in China provide a strategic bridge between Western quality expectations and Chinese production efficiency. By understanding the cost dynamics of White Label vs. Private Label models and leveraging volume-based pricing, procurement managers can optimize total cost of ownership while building scalable, defensible brands.
For tailored sourcing strategies, including vetted factory referrals and cost modeling, contact SourcifyChina’s U.S.-China Sourcing Desk.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina | Senior Sourcing Consultants
February 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Advanced Manufacturer Verification Protocol (2026)
Prepared for Global Procurement Leadership | Confidential – For Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
The misidentification of “American-owned companies in China” remains a critical risk vector for global supply chains. 87% of entities claiming “US ownership” in China are either trading companies or Chinese-owned entities with US marketing affiliates (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit Data). True US-owned manufacturing in China is exceptionally rare due to China’s Foreign Investment Law (2020), which mandates Chinese majority ownership in most manufacturing sectors. This report provides forensic verification protocols to eliminate supplier misrepresentation and mitigate supply chain disruption risks.
Critical Verification Protocol: Beyond the “American Ownership” Claim
Step 1: Deconstruct the Ownership Claim (Non-Negotiable First Step)
Do not proceed without legal entity verification.
| Verification Action | Required Evidence | Red Flag Indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Chinese Entity Search | Official Business License (营业执照) from SAMR (State Administration for Market Regulation) portal. Cross-check license number at www.gsxt.gov.cn | • License shows “Foreign Invested Enterprise” (FIE) but no US parent entity listed • Registered capital < $500K USD (indicates trading entity) |
| US Entity Verification | • US Secretary of State business registration (e.g., Delaware SOS) • IRS Form 10-K/EIN documentation |
• “Registered Agent” address is virtual office (e.g., CSC, Harvard Business Services) • No verifiable US operational footprint |
| Equity Structure Analysis | Foreign Investment Enterprise Certificate (外商投资企业批准证书) + Articles of Association (公司章程) | • Chinese shareholder holds >51% voting rights (legally required) • “US Owner” listed as minority shareholder or technical licensor only |
Key Insight: Under Chinese law, 100% US-owned manufacturing entities are prohibited in >75% of industrial sectors (e.g., textiles, electronics assembly). What exists are:
– Sino-US Joint Ventures (Chinese majority-owned)
– Wholly Foreign-Owned Enterprises (WFOEs) with Chinese-controlled supply chains
– Trading Companies with US-facing sales offices
Step 2: Distinguish Trading Company vs. Factory (Field-Tested Methodology)
| Verification Point | Authentic Factory Evidence | Trading Company Red Flags |
|---|---|---|
| On-Site Production | • Live production line observed during visit • Raw material inventory matching BOM • In-house QC lab with testing equipment |
• “Factory tour” limited to showroom/sample room • Staff cannot explain process parameters • No raw material storage visible |
| Document Trail | • Customs Export Records showing factory as shipper (not “agent”) • VAT Invoices (增值税发票) with factory’s tax ID as seller |
• Invoices list third-party factory as seller • Export docs show “Agent” or “Broker” role |
| Workforce Verification | • Payroll records for >50 direct employees • Social security payment records (社保) • On-site worker ID checks |
• Staff wear generic uniforms (no company logo) • HR claims “all workers are subcontracted” |
| Asset Ownership | • Land使用权 Certificate (土地使用证) or factory lease >3 years • Machinery ownership docs (not finance leases) |
• “Factory” address matches business hotel/office park • Machinery listed as “leased from partner” |
Step 3: Critical Red Flags Requiring Immediate Disqualification
| Risk Category | High-Risk Indicators (Disqualify Supplier) |
|---|---|
| Ownership Obfuscation | • Refusal to provide Chinese business license scan • Claims “US parent handles all documentation” • Uses “.us” domain but Chinese server IP |
| Operational Fraud | • Requests advance payment before factory audit • Sample made by different facility than production • No capability to sign IP protection addendum |
| Compliance Gaps | • Cannot produce valid ISO 9001/14001 certificates (verify via SAC database) • No social insurance for workers (verified via 12333.gov.cn) |
| Financial Instability | • Registered capital < 5M RMB ($700K USD) • Multiple legal disputes on China Judgments (wenshu.court.gov.cn) |
Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Leaders
- Reframe Sourcing Objectives: Prioritize operational control over ownership claims. Target factories with:
- US-experienced management team (verify LinkedIn/resumes)
- Direct export licenses (海关进出口权)
-
Minimum 3 years of audited production history
-
Mandate Third-Party Verification:
- Require pre-shipment audit by SGS/Bureau Veritas with factory ownership verification clause
-
Use SourcifyChina’s Entity DNA Scan™ (patent pending) to cross-reference 12 Chinese regulatory databases
-
Contract Safeguards:
- Include “Factory Representation Warranty” clause with liquidated damages for misrepresentation
- Require annual SAMR license renewal certificates as contractual obligation
2026 Market Reality: Ownership structure is less critical than verifiable operational transparency. A Chinese-owned factory with US-trained engineers and direct export capability delivers lower risk than a “US-owned” entity reliant on subcontractors.
Prepared by:
Alex Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant | SourcifyChina
Verified by SourcifyChina’s AI-Powered Supplier Intelligence Engine (v4.2)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved. Unauthorized distribution prohibited.
Next Step: Request our Manufacturer Verification Field Kit (includes SAMR search tutorial, factory audit checklist, and Chinese legal entity decoding guide) at sourcifychina.com/verification-kit
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Executive Summary: Strategic Sourcing Advantage in 2026
In an increasingly complex global supply chain environment, identifying reliable, transparent, and culturally aligned suppliers in China remains a top challenge for procurement leaders. With rising compliance risks, quality variability, and communication barriers, sourcing decisions must balance speed, trust, and operational efficiency.
SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List: American-Owned Companies in China delivers a strategic advantage by connecting international buyers with U.S.-operated manufacturing and sourcing partners on the ground in China. These are not just suppliers—they are American-managed entities with U.S. standards in quality control, communication, and business ethics.
Why the Verified Pro List Saves Time and Mitigates Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted & Verified Ownership | Eliminates weeks of due diligence—companies are confirmed as American-owned or managed, reducing fraud risk. |
| English-First Communication | Streamlines negotiations, audits, and issue resolution with native-level English speakers. |
| U.S. Business Standards | Ensures alignment with Western expectations in compliance, IP protection, and reporting. |
| Faster Onboarding | Reduces supplier qualification time by up to 60% compared to sourcing from general directories. |
| Dedicated Point of Contact | Each Pro List partner has a U.S.-aligned management team available during overlapping business hours. |
Procurement teams using the Pro List report 30–50% faster time-to-order and significantly higher first-time quality pass rates.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t waste another quarter navigating unreliable suppliers or managing cross-cultural miscommunications. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List is your shortcut to trusted, high-performance partners in China—engineered for global procurement success.
👉 Contact us today to request your customized Pro List and speak with a Senior Sourcing Consultant:
- Email: [email protected]
- WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our team is ready to help you identify the right American-owned partners in China—fast, securely, and with zero obligation.
Make 2026 your most efficient sourcing year yet.
Trust. Speed. Results. SourcifyChina.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
