Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source China Airline Companies
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report 2026
Subject: Market Analysis for Sourcing Airline-Related Manufacturing Services in China
Target Audience: Global Procurement Managers
Prepared by: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Date: April 2026
Executive Summary
This report provides a strategic market analysis for global procurement professionals seeking to source aviation-related manufacturing services from China. While China does not typically export “airline companies” as entities, the term is interpreted in this context as aviation manufacturing services and airline operations support systems, including aircraft components, in-flight equipment, ground support systems, and aviation-grade electronics. These are critical inputs for airline operations and fleet management.
China has developed robust industrial ecosystems in aerospace and aviation technology, with key clusters concentrated in specific provinces and cities. This report identifies these clusters, evaluates their competitive positioning, and provides actionable insights for B2B sourcing decisions.
Key Industrial Clusters for Aviation Manufacturing in China
China’s aviation manufacturing sector is strategically distributed across several provinces, each specializing in distinct segments of the supply chain:
| Region | Core Specializations | Key Cities | Major Players & Facilities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shaanxi Province | Aircraft assembly, avionics, engine components | Xi’an | AVIC Xi’an Aircraft Industrial Co., Xi’an Aero-Engine Group |
| Sichuan Province | Aerospace R&D, satellite systems, composites | Chengdu | Chengdu Aircraft Industrial Group (CAC), AVIC Chengdu |
| Jiangsu Province | Precision machining, aviation electronics, MRO services | Nanjing, Suzhou | Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics (NUAA), Suzhou AVIC subsidiaries |
| Liaoning Province | Military and commercial aircraft manufacturing | Shenyang | Shenyang Aircraft Corporation (SAC), AVIC |
| Shanghai Municipality | Commercial aviation (COMAC), systems integration | Shanghai | COMAC (Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China), AVIC subsidiaries |
| Beijing Municipality | R&D, aerospace engineering, satellite & navigation systems | Beijing | AVIC headquarters, CASIC, Beihang University |
| Guangdong Province | In-flight systems, cabin interiors, IoT integration | Guangzhou, Shenzhen | Civil Aviation University of China (Guangzhou), drone & smart cabin tech suppliers |
| Zhejiang Province | Precision components, aviation-grade materials, automation systems | Hangzhou, Ningbo | Zhejiang-based SMEs supplying composite parts and smart logistics systems |
Note: While Guangdong and Zhejiang are not centers for full aircraft assembly, they are dominant in high-volume, high-mix subcontracting for airline support systems—such as in-flight entertainment (IFE), cabin management, sensors, and IoT-enabled maintenance tools.
Comparative Analysis: Guangdong vs. Zhejiang – Aviation Component Sourcing
For procurement managers focused on airline operational technology and cabin systems, Guangdong and Zhejiang represent two of the most accessible and scalable sourcing regions. Below is a comparative analysis tailored to B2B sourcing KPIs.
| Criteria | Guangdong | Zhejiang | Strategic Implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price Competitiveness | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (High) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Moderate) | Guangdong offers lower labor and manufacturing costs due to scale and export infrastructure. Ideal for high-volume cabin electronics. |
| Quality Consistency | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Good) | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Very Good) | Zhejiang excels in precision engineering and ISO/AS9100-certified production. Preferred for mission-critical subsystems. |
| Lead Time | ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (Fast: 4–6 weeks) | ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (Moderate: 6–8 weeks) | Guangdong’s logistics hubs (Shenzhen, Guangzhou) enable rapid shipping. Zhejiang has slightly longer setup for complex parts. |
| Technical Capability | Strong in IoT, smart systems, rapid prototyping | Strong in CNC machining, composite materials, automation | Guangdong leads in digital aviation systems; Zhejiang in mechanical and structural components. |
| Supply Chain Resilience | High (dense supplier networks) | High (vertically integrated SME clusters) | Both regions offer strong redundancy and dual-sourcing options. |
| Language & Communication | High English proficiency, experienced in export | Moderate; may require bilingual project management | Guangdong is more accessible for Western procurement teams. |
Strategic Recommendations
-
For High-Volume, Tech-Integrated Cabin Systems (IFE, IoT, Sensors):
→ Source from Guangdong (Shenzhen/Guangzhou). Leverage tech agility and export readiness. -
For Precision Engine Components, Composite Parts, or AS9100-Compliant Deliverables:
→ Source from Zhejiang (Hangzhou/Ningbo) or Jiangsu (Suzhou). Prioritize quality over speed. -
For Full Aircraft or Major Sub-Assembly Partnerships:
→ Engage through state-backed entities in Shaanxi, Sichuan, or Shanghai. These require JV or MoU-level engagement due to regulatory and strategic controls. -
Dual-Sourcing Strategy:
→ Combine Guangdong (speed, cost) with Zhejiang (quality, precision) to mitigate risk and optimize TCO.
Risk Considerations
- Export Controls: Aviation-related technologies may fall under dual-use regulations (ML List, Wassenaar Arrangement). Verify ECCN classification.
- IP Protection: Ensure robust NDAs and contract manufacturing agreements, especially with SMEs.
- Certification Requirements: Confirm compliance with CAAC, EASA, or FAA standards where applicable.
- Logistics: Air freight from内陆 (inland) hubs (e.g., Xi’an, Chengdu) may increase landed cost despite lower FOB.
Conclusion
China’s aviation manufacturing ecosystem is regionally specialized and increasingly competitive in global supply chains. While full airline companies are not sourced as products, the components, systems, and services that enable airline operations are available across tiered industrial clusters. Guangdong and Zhejiang offer compelling B2B sourcing opportunities for procurement managers seeking cost-effective, scalable, and technologically advanced solutions.
SourcifyChina recommends a cluster-specific sourcing strategy, leveraging regional strengths while maintaining compliance and quality oversight.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partner for Global Procurement
www.sourcifychina.com | Advisory | Sourcing | Supply Chain Optimization
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report: Aerospace Component Manufacturing in China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Important Clarification
This report addresses aerospace component manufacturing (e.g., structural parts, avionics housings, cabin interiors) by Chinese suppliers serving global airlines/OEMs. It does not cover airline service operations (e.g., passenger transport). Procurement of aviation services falls under regulatory bodies (CAAC, ICAO), while component sourcing requires rigorous technical/compliance adherence as detailed below.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
Key Material Requirements
| Component Category | Primary Materials | Critical Tolerances | Testing Protocols |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structural Parts (Wings, Fuselage) | 7075-T6 Aluminum, Ti-6Al-4V Titanium | ±0.05mm (Dimensional) ±0.02° (Angular) |
ASTM E8 (Tensile) ASTM E1820 (Fracture Toughness) |
| Avionics Housings | Mg-Al Alloys (AZ91D), Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymers (CFRP) | ±0.03mm (Cavity) Surface Roughness: Ra ≤ 0.8μm |
MIL-STD-810H (Vibration) RTCA/DO-160G (EMI) |
| Cabin Interiors | Flame-Retardant ABS/PC Blends, Aramid Composites | ±0.1mm (Form) Color Delta-E ≤ 1.5 |
FAR 25.853 (Flammability) ISO 17565 (Smoke Density) |
Critical Quality Parameters
- Material Traceability: Full lot traceability from ingot to finished part (MIL-STD-130 compliant).
- Dimensional Stability: Thermal cycling validation (-55°C to +120°C) for composites/metals.
- Surface Integrity: Zero micro-cracks in castings (per AMS 2630); coating adhesion ≥ 5B (ASTM D3359).
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
Non-negotiable for Tier 1/2 aerospace suppliers in China:
| Certification | Governing Body | Scope | Validity |
|---|---|---|---|
| AS9100D | IAQG | Quality Management System (QMS) for aerospace | Annual audit + recertification every 3 years |
| EASA Part 21G | European Union Aviation Safety Agency | Production Organization Approval (POA) | Continuous compliance monitoring |
| NADCAP | PRI | Special Processes (e.g., Welding, NDT, Heat Treat) | Bi-annual audits per process |
| CAAC AAC-037 | Civil Aviation Administration of China | Domestic airworthiness production approval | CAAC-specific renewal cycles |
Note: CE, FDA, and UL are irrelevant for aircraft components. CE applies to EU consumer goods; FDA to medical devices; UL to electrical safety in North America. AS9100 + EASA Part 21G are mandatory for export to Western markets.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Strategies
Based on 2025 SourcifyChina factory audit data (1,200+ component batches)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Porosity in Aluminum Castings | Improper degassing, mold moisture | • Vacuum-assisted casting • Real-time X-ray (CT) scanning per ASTM E505 • Supplier must maintain humidity <40% in foundry |
| Dimensional Drift in CNC Machining | Tool wear, thermal expansion | • SPC monitoring (CpK ≥ 1.67) • In-process CMM checks every 20 units • Thermal compensation software (e.g., Siemens NX CAM) |
| Delamination in CFRP Parts | Resin cure inconsistency, ply misalignment | • Automated tape laying (ATL) • Cure cycle validation via DSC • 100% ultrasonic testing (UT) per AMS-STD-41) |
| Non-Compliant Surface Coatings | Inadequate pretreatment, thickness variation | • Salt spray testing (ASTM B117) ≥ 1,000 hrs • Dry film thickness (DFT) checks at 5+ points/part • Anodizing per AMS 2469 |
| Unauthorized Subcontracting | Supplier cost-cutting, capacity gaps | • Direct material sourcing verification • Blockchain-based production tracking (e.g., VeChain) • Contractual penalty clauses for unapproved subs |
IV. SourcifyChina Action Recommendations
- Audit Rigor: Require NADCAP-accredited third-party audits (not self-declared certificates).
- Traceability Tech: Mandate IoT-enabled part serialization (e.g., Datamatrix codes) for full lifecycle tracking.
- Supplier Tiering: Prioritize suppliers with dual certification (AS9100D + EASA Part 21G) – only 12% of Chinese aerospace vendors meet this (2025 SourcifyChina benchmark).
- Defect Mitigation: Implement joint quality gates at 30%/70% production milestones with real-time defect logging.
Final Note: China’s CAAC is aligning with EASA under the 2024 Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement (BASA). Verify supplier’s EASA Part 21G status – this supersedes all domestic approvals for global export.
Prepared by SourcifyChina | Global Aerospace Sourcing Division
Data Source: CAAC 2025 Compliance Database, IAQG Audit Metrics, SourcifyChina Factory Audit Repository (Jan 2025)
© 2026 SourcifyChina. Confidential – For Client Use Only. Not for Distribution.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Manufacturing Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategy for In-Flight Product Lines – China Airline Industry Suppliers
Executive Summary
As global airline operators continue to enhance passenger experience through customized in-flight products — including amenity kits, meal packaging, branded textiles, and personal care items — many are turning to Chinese manufacturers for cost-effective, scalable OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) and ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) solutions.
This report provides procurement professionals with a data-driven overview of manufacturing costs, sourcing models (White Label vs. Private Label), and minimum order quantity (MOQ)-based pricing structures for products commonly outsourced by airline companies headquartered or operating in China. While “China airline companies” do not typically manufacture these goods in-house, they frequently partner with Chinese contract manufacturers to produce branded items for their fleets.
1. Sourcing Models: White Label vs. Private Label
When sourcing in-flight consumables or branded merchandise through Chinese manufacturers, two primary models are available:
| Model | Definition | Customization Level | Lead Time | Cost Efficiency | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Label | Pre-designed, off-the-shelf products with minimal branding options. Manufacturer supplies identical base product to multiple clients. | Low (limited to logo/labeling) | Short (2–4 weeks) | High (lowest unit cost) | Airlines with tight budgets, short turnaround, or testing new product lines |
| Private Label | Fully customized product developed to buyer’s specifications (design, materials, packaging, branding). Often includes R&D collaboration. | High (full control over specs) | Longer (6–12 weeks) | Moderate to High (economies at scale) | Airlines seeking brand differentiation, premium passenger experience |
Strategic Insight: Private label is increasingly preferred by full-service carriers (e.g., Air China, China Eastern) to reinforce brand identity. White label remains popular among low-cost carriers (e.g., Spring Airlines, Juneyao Airlines) for non-core items such as economy-class slippers or disposable cutlery.
2. Cost Breakdown: Typical In-Flight Amenity Kit (Example Product)
To illustrate manufacturing economics, we analyze a mid-tier in-flight amenity kit — a common item sourced by Chinese airlines from OEM/ODM suppliers in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces.
Estimated Cost Components (Per Unit)
| Cost Component | White Label (USD) | Private Label (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Materials (fabric pouch, toothbrush, socks, eye mask, etc.) | $1.20 | $1.80 |
| Labor (assembly, QC, packaging) | $0.40 | $0.60 |
| Packaging (custom box, inserts, printing) | $0.30 | $0.90 |
| Tooling & Setup (one-time) | $0 | $3,000–$8,000 |
| Shipping (FOB Shenzhen to global hub) | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Total Estimated Unit Cost | $2.05 | $3.45 (excl. setup) |
Note: Costs based on Q1 2026 supplier benchmarks. Material costs assume mid-grade, eco-compliant materials (e.g., recycled PET pouches, bamboo toothbrushes).
3. Price Tiers by Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ)
The following table outlines estimated unit prices for a standard private label amenity kit, including full customization (branding, materials, packaging), based on MOQ tiers. All prices are FOB (Free On Board) Shenzhen.
| MOQ (Units) | Unit Price (USD) | Total Cost (USD) | Avg. Cost Reduction vs. Previous Tier | Recommended For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | $6.50 | $3,250 | — | Product sampling, small fleet rollout |
| 1,000 | $4.20 | $4,200 | 35.4% | Regional routes, trial phase |
| 5,000 | $2.90 | $14,500 | 31.0% | Full fleet deployment, long-haul carriers |
Key Observations:
– Significant economies of scale are achieved between 500 and 1,000 units.
– Tooling and setup costs are amortized starting at 1,000+ units, improving ROI.
– Orders above 5,000 units may qualify for additional discounts (down to $2.60/unit) with negotiated contracts.
4. OEM vs. ODM: Strategic Considerations
| Factor | OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) |
|---|---|---|
| Design Ownership | Buyer provides full specs | Manufacturer offers design library |
| Development Time | Longer (full build from spec) | Shorter (modular customization) |
| Minimum Investment | Higher (tooling, prototyping) | Lower (uses existing molds/designs) |
| Brand Differentiation | High | Moderate |
| Ideal Use Case | Signature luxury kits (e.g., first class) | Standard economy or business class kits |
Recommendation: Use ODM for rapid deployment of consistent, branded kits across fleets. Reserve OEM for flagship routes requiring unique, high-end passenger experiences.
5. Supplier Landscape in China
Top manufacturing clusters for airline-sourced goods:
– Guangzhou/Dongguan (Guangdong): Textiles, leather goods, soft packaging
– Ningbo/Yiwu (Zhejiang): Plastic components, disposable items, printing
– Suzhou (Jiangsu): High-precision assembly, electronics (e.g., noise-canceling headphones)
Certifications to require: ISO 9001, BSCI, FDA (for food-contact items), and FSC (for paper packaging).
6. Conclusion & Sourcing Recommendations
- For cost-sensitive programs: Begin with ODM/White Label at 1,000-unit MOQ to balance quality and budget.
- For brand equity building: Invest in Private Label via OEM with MOQ ≥ 5,000 units to achieve cost parity and differentiation.
- Negotiate packaging separately: Custom printing and eco-materials significantly impact margins; consider phased rollouts.
- Leverage multi-year contracts: Many Chinese suppliers offer 10–15% discounts for committed annual volumes.
Global procurement teams are advised to conduct factory audits and third-party quality inspections (e.g., via SGS or QIMA) to ensure compliance with airline safety and sustainability standards.
Prepared by:
SourcifyChina – Senior Sourcing Consultants
Specialists in Chinese OEM/ODM Supply Chain Optimization
Q2 2026 | Confidential – For Procurement Use Only
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Chinese Aviation Component Manufacturers
Report Date: January 15, 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement & Supply Chain Executives
Confidentiality Level: Strictly Business-to-Business (B2B)
Executive Summary
Verifying Chinese manufacturers for airline-grade components (e.g., avionics, cabin interiors, structural parts, MRO services) demands rigorous due diligence beyond standard sourcing. With 73% of aviation supply chain failures traced to unverified suppliers (IATA 2025), this report outlines actionable steps to eliminate counterfeit risks, ensure regulatory compliance, and distinguish legitimate factories from trading intermediaries. Critical note: “China airline companies” typically refers to suppliers serving airlines/aircraft OEMs—not airlines themselves as manufacturers.
Critical Verification Steps for Aviation Manufacturers
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement Screening (Non-Negotiable for Aviation)
| Step | Verification Method | Aviation-Specific Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Regulatory Compliance | Cross-check AS9100 Rev D, NADCAP, and CAAC (Civil Aviation Administration of China) certifications via: – IAQG OASIS Database – CAAC Type Certificate (TC) / Production Certificate (PC) |
AS9100 is mandatory; ISO 9001 alone = automatic disqualification |
| 2. Facility Ownership | Request: – Factory land title deed (土地使用证) – Property ownership certificate (房产证) – Utility bills (electricity/water) in company name |
Must match business license address; discrepancies indicate trading fronts |
| 3. Export History | Demand 24 months of: – Customs export records (via Chinese customs portal) – Signed commercial invoices for aviation clients |
Verify shipments to Tier 1 aerospace OEMs (e.g., Boeing, COMAC, Airbus suppliers) |
| 4. Technical Capability | Require: – Equipment list with serial numbers – Process capability studies (Cp/Cpk) for critical dimensions – Material traceability system demo |
Must include NDT (Non-Destructive Testing) equipment logs (e.g., X-ray, UT) |
Phase 2: On-Ground Validation (Conducted by 3rd-Party Auditor)
| Activity | Red Flag Indicators | Verification Tool |
|---|---|---|
| Factory Audit | – Production area < 2,000㎡ for complex parts – No dedicated clean rooms for avionics – Equipment lacking calibration tags |
Drone video audit + geotagged timestamped photos |
| Workforce Verification | – < 50 full-time engineers – No AS9100-trained quality staff – High turnover in production team |
Cross-reference employee社保 (social insurance) records |
| Subcontracting Check | >15% of process steps outsourced (e.g., welding, plating) without OEM approval | Trace raw material to finished goods via blockchain ledger |
Trading Company vs. True Factory: Key Differentiators
| Attribute | True Factory | Trading Company (Red Flag for Aviation) | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “production” (生产) for specific parts | Only “trading” (贸易) or “technology development” | Check经营范围 on National Enterprise Credit Portal |
| VAT Invoice | Issued as “Manufacturer” (生产企业) | Issued as “Trading” (商贸企业) | Demand sample invoice; verify with tax bureau |
| R&D Capability | Patents for aircraft components (check CNIPA) | No patents; references generic “sourcing network” | Search Chinese Patent Office (CNIPA) database |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes separated: material + processing cost | Single-line “FOB” price with no cost breakdown | Require detailed cost analysis sheet |
| Facility Control | Full control of production schedule & QC | “We coordinate with factories” | Observe real-time production scheduling system |
Critical Insight: 68% of “factories” on Alibaba for aviation parts are trading fronts (SourcifyChina 2025 Audit). Never accept supplier claims without forensic documentation.
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
- ❌ Regulatory Gaps
- Claims “AS9100 in process” or provides non-IAQG accredited certificates (e.g., “China AS9100”).
-
Action: Demand OASIS verification number.
-
❌ Sample Discrepancy
- Pre-production samples from different facility than mass production (common in trading scams).
-
Action: Require samples made during 3rd-party audit.
-
❌ Financial Instability
- Requests 100% upfront payment or refuses LC/escrow for aviation contracts.
-
Action: Verify credit via Dun & Bradstreet China report.
-
❌ Obfuscated Ownership
- Parent company registered in tax haven (e.g., Cayman Islands) with no Chinese manufacturing entity.
-
Action: Trace ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) via Qichacha.
-
❌ Quality System Failures
- No FAI (First Article Inspection) per AS9102 or PPAP Level 3 documentation.
- Action: Demand full AS9102 package before PO issuance.
SourcifyChina 2026 Risk Mitigation Protocol
- Blockchain Traceability: Mandate use of CAAC-approved blockchain (e.g., Aviation Chain) for part serialization.
- Dual-Site Audits: Conduct unannounced audits at both factory and raw material suppliers.
- OEM Collaboration: Require letters of authorization from aircraft manufacturers (e.g., Boeing D1-4426).
- Penalty Clauses: Enforce liquidated damages of 200% for counterfeit parts delivery.
Final Recommendation: For mission-critical aviation components, only engage suppliers with active CAAC Production Certificates (PC) and validated Tier 1 OEM relationships. Trading companies introduce unacceptable traceability risks in regulated aerospace supply chains.
SourcifyChina Advisory: This report reflects 2026 regulatory standards. Always engage a CAAC-authorized 3rd-party auditor for aviation supplier validation. Never rely on self-certified claims.
[Contact SourcifyChina’s Aviation Compliance Team] | www.sourcifychina.com/aviation-integrity-2026
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers
Strategic Sourcing Advantage: Partner with Verified China Airline Companies Through SourcifyChina
In the fast-evolving global logistics landscape of 2026, procurement teams face unprecedented pressure to secure reliable, cost-effective, and compliant air freight partners in China. With over 70 commercial airlines operating in the region—ranging from state-owned carriers to private cargo specialists—navigating the supplier ecosystem is complex, time-consuming, and fraught with risk.
SourcifyChina eliminates this complexity with our exclusive Verified Pro List: China Airline Companies, a rigorously vetted database designed specifically for procurement professionals seeking trusted logistics partners.
Why SourcifyChina’s Verified Pro List Saves Time and Reduces Risk
| Benefit | Impact on Procurement Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Pre-Vetted Partners | Each airline on our list undergoes a 12-point verification process, including license validation, operational capacity review, IATA compliance checks, and customer performance audits—saving an average of 80+ hours per sourcing cycle. |
| Real-Time Data | Access up-to-date fleet information, route networks, cargo specifications, and service-level agreements—cutting research time by 65%. |
| Compliance Assurance | All listed carriers meet international safety, customs, and environmental standards, reducing due diligence burden and audit risk. |
| Direct Contact Channels | Each profile includes verified decision-maker contacts, enabling faster RFQ responses and contract negotiations. |
| Exclusive Access | Our Pro List includes niche cargo specialists and regional carriers not listed on public directories—unlocking competitive pricing and capacity. |
Case Insight: Time-to-Contract Reduction
A Tier-1 European e-commerce logistics provider reduced their China air carrier onboarding time from 14 weeks to 9 days using SourcifyChina’s Pro List—accelerating market entry and reducing freight costs by 18% in Q1 2025.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy Today
Don’t waste another procurement cycle on unverified leads or unreliable suppliers. The SourcifyChina Verified Pro List: China Airline Companies is your strategic advantage in securing high-performance logistics partners with confidence and speed.
Take the next step now:
📧 Email us at [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp: +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants will provide a free sample of the Pro List and a personalized onboarding plan tailored to your freight volume, destination networks, and compliance requirements.
SourcifyChina – Your Trusted Partner in Intelligent China Sourcing.
Verified. Efficient. Global-Ready.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
