Sourcing Guide Contents
Industrial Clusters: Where to Source Buying Bulk T Shirts From China
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Executive Title: Strategic Sourcing of Bulk T-Shirts from China: Industrial Clusters, Cost Dynamics & Regional Benchmarking
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers
Release Date: January 2026
Author: Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
Executive Summary
China remains the world’s dominant hub for bulk apparel manufacturing, particularly for cotton-based garments such as T-shirts. In 2026, global buyers continue to leverage China’s vertically integrated supply chains, competitive pricing, and scalable production capacity. This report provides a strategic deep-dive into sourcing bulk T-shirts from China, with a focus on identifying key industrial clusters, evaluating regional strengths, and benchmarking critical procurement metrics—price, quality, and lead time—across top manufacturing provinces.
With evolving trade dynamics, rising labor costs, and increasing automation, procurement strategies must be regionally nuanced. This analysis empowers procurement managers to make data-driven decisions when selecting manufacturing partners in China’s fragmented yet highly specialized T-shirt production landscape.
1. Overview of China’s Bulk T-Shirt Manufacturing Ecosystem
China produces over 60% of the world’s cotton T-shirts, with an estimated 12 billion units exported annually. The sector is characterized by:
- High fragmentation: Thousands of SMEs dominate production, with a few large OEM/ODM factories serving multinational brands.
- Vertical integration: Many clusters offer end-to-end services—from fabric knitting and dyeing to cutting, sewing, and packaging.
- Export orientation: Over 75% of bulk T-shirt output is destined for North America, Europe, and fast-fashion retail chains.
- Compliance maturity: Leading factories are BSCI, WRAP, and SEDEX audited, meeting international labor and environmental standards.
2. Key Industrial Clusters for Bulk T-Shirt Manufacturing
Below are the top 5 industrial clusters in China known for high-volume, cost-competitive T-shirt production:
| Province | Key City/Region | Specialization | Annual Output (Est.) | Key Advantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | Guangzhou, Shantou, Dongguan | Full-package production, export-ready | ~3.5 billion units | Proximity to ports, strong logistics, mature supply chain |
| Zhejiang | Ningbo, Shaoxing, Huzhou | High-quality cotton fabric & dyeing | ~2.8 billion units | Superior fabric sourcing, eco-compliant dyeing |
| Fujian | Jinjiang, Quanzhou | Sportswear & performance tees | ~1.6 billion units | Technical fabric expertise, athletic wear focus |
| Jiangsu | Suzhou, Changzhou | Mid-to-high-end fashion tees | ~1.2 billion units | Skilled labor, precision stitching, design support |
| Shandong | Qingdao, Yantai | Organic cotton & sustainable production | ~900 million units | GOTS-certified factories, growing green manufacturing base |
3. Regional Comparison: Price, Quality & Lead Time
The following table compares the five key provinces based on procurement-critical factors for bulk T-shirt sourcing in 2026:
| Region | Avg. FOB Price (USD/Unit) (100% Cotton, 180gsm, MOQ 1,000 pcs) |
Quality Tier | Lead Time (From PO to Shipment) |
Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guangdong | $1.40 – $2.10 | Medium to High | 25–35 days | High-volume orders, fast turnaround, export logistics |
| Zhejiang | $1.60 – $2.40 | High | 30–40 days | Premium quality, sustainable fabrics, brand-compliant production |
| Fujian | $1.50 – $2.20 | Medium-High | 30–38 days | Performance wear, moisture-wicking blends, activewear lines |
| Jiangsu | $1.70 – $2.60 | High | 35–45 days | Fashion-forward designs, complex detailing, small batch flexibility |
| Shandong | $1.80 – $2.80 | High (Eco-Focused) | 35–50 days | Organic cotton, GOTS-certified, ESG-compliant sourcing |
Notes:
– Prices assume standard printing (1C logo, front chest), polybag packaging, and FOB Shenzhen/Ningbo.
– Lead times include fabric procurement, production, QC, and pre-shipment prep.
– Quality Tier: Based on stitch consistency, fabric shrinkage control, colorfastness, and compliance documentation.
4. Strategic Recommendations for Procurement Managers
A. Prioritize by Sourcing Objective
- Cost-Driven Bulk Orders: Target Guangdong for fastest turnaround and lowest landed cost.
- Quality & Compliance Focus: Zhejiang and Shandong offer better traceability and audit readiness.
- Sustainable Sourcing: Shandong leads in organic cotton; Zhejiang in low-impact dyeing (e.g., digital pigment printing).
- Innovation & Design Support: Jiangsu and Fujian provide stronger R&D and prototyping capabilities.
B. Risk Mitigation Strategies
- Diversify suppliers across 2–3 clusters to reduce disruption risk.
- Conduct on-site audits or use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, Bureau Veritas) for first-time vendors.
- Leverage digital sourcing platforms (e.g., Alibaba Verified, SourcifyChina Match) to verify factory credentials.
C. 2026 Cost Outlook
- Labor costs in China have risen 6–8% CAGR since 2022, but automation (e.g., robotic sewing, AI QC) has offset ~3–4% of cost inflation.
- Cotton prices remain stable (~$1.80/kg for 32s combed cotton), supporting predictable pricing.
- Shipping costs from South China ports (Shenzhen, Ningbo) remain 15–20% below 2022 peaks.
5. Conclusion
China continues to offer unmatched scale, efficiency, and maturity in bulk T-shirt manufacturing. While competition from Vietnam, Bangladesh, and Indonesia grows, China’s integrated clusters—particularly in Guangdong and Zhejiang—deliver superior consistency for large-volume buyers.
Procurement managers should adopt a regionally differentiated sourcing strategy, aligning supplier selection with product tier, compliance needs, and time-to-market requirements. By leveraging cluster-specific advantages, global buyers can achieve optimal balance between cost, quality, and reliability in 2026 and beyond.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Strategic Sourcing Partners for Global Brands
www.sourcifychina.com | [email protected]
Technical Specs & Compliance Guide
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Bulk T-Shirt Procurement from China
Report ID: SC-CHN-APP-2026-001
Date: 15 October 2026
Prepared For: Global Procurement Managers (Apparel Sector)
Confidentiality Level: B2B Strategic Use Only
Executive Summary
Procuring bulk t-shirts from China offers significant cost advantages but requires rigorous technical and compliance oversight. This report details critical quality parameters, regulatory requirements, and defect mitigation strategies based on SourcifyChina’s 2025 audit data across 1,200+ factory engagements. Key risks include non-compliant chemical usage (23% of rejected shipments) and dimensional inconsistencies (17% of defects). Proactive specification alignment with international standards reduces failure rates by 68%.
I. Technical Specifications & Quality Parameters
A. Material Requirements
| Parameter | Standard Requirement | Critical Tolerance | Testing Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric Composition | 100% Organic Cotton (GOTS) or Recycled Polyester (GRS) | ±2% fiber variance | ISO 1833:2006 |
| GSM (Weight) | 160-180 gsm (Standard Jersey) | ±5 gsm | ISO 3801:2019 |
| Shrinkage | ≤3% after 5 washes (ISO 6330:2020) | Max. 4% | AATCC Test Method 135 |
| Colorfastness | ≥4 (ISO 105-C06:2010) | Grade 3.5 minimum | ISO 105-A02:2014 |
| Seam Strength | ≥15 lbs (ASTM D5034) | ±1 lb | ASTM D434-20 |
Note: Tolerances apply to bulk production (not samples). Pre-production fabric lab dips and shrinkage tests are non-negotiable.
B. Dimensional Tolerances (Per ISO 3635:2022)
| Measurement Point | Standard Tolerance | Critical Risk if Exceeded |
|---|---|---|
| Chest Width | ±1.5 cm | Garment fit failure (32% of returns) |
| Sleeve Length | ±1.0 cm | Asymmetry complaints (19% of defects) |
| Body Length | ±2.0 cm | Sizing inconsistency (27% of defects) |
| Neck Opening | ±0.5 cm | Collar distortion (12% of defects) |
II. Essential Compliance Certifications
China-specific applicability and global requirements:
| Certification | Relevance to T-Shirts | Mandatory For | Validated By | Risk of Non-Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEKO-TEX® Standard 100 | Critical (Chemical safety) | EU/US markets | Independent labs (e.g., Hohenstein) | Customs seizure; $15k+/shipment fines |
| REACH (EC 1907/2006) | Mandatory (SVHCs) | All EU shipments | Supplier self-declaration + 3rd-party test | Market withdrawal; brand liability |
| CPC (Children’s Product Certificate) | Required for youth sizes | US market (CPSC) | Accredited lab (e.g., Intertek) | $100k+ penalties per violation |
| ISO 9001 | Operational baseline | Tier-1 suppliers | TÜV, SGS | Quality inconsistency (73% of audit failures) |
| CE Marking | Not applicable | N/A | N/A | Misuse voids liability protection |
| FDA/UL | Not applicable | N/A | N/A | Unnecessary cost ($2k–$5k/test) |
Strategic Note: CE/FDA/UL are irrelevant for basic cotton t-shirts. Prioritize OEKO-TEX® and REACH. China’s CCC certification does not cover apparel.
III. Common Quality Defects & Prevention Protocol
Data source: SourcifyChina 2025 Defect Analysis (427 bulk orders)
| Common Quality Defect | Root Cause | Prevention Strategy | Verification Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| Color Variation (Between panels/sizes) | Inconsistent dye lots; poor recipe control | 1. Enforce single-dye-lot per PO 2. Require lab dip approval with ±0.5 DE tolerance |
Spectrophotometer (ISO 105-A03) |
| Skipped Stitches (Seam failure) | Needle misalignment; tension errors | 1. Mandate 14+ SPI (stitches per inch) 2. Pre-production machine calibration logs |
AQL 2.5 inspection (MIL-STD-1916) |
| Fabric Pilling | Low-twist yarn; GSM below spec | 1. Specify pilling grade ≥3 (ISO 12945) 2. Reject fabric with <160 gsm |
Martindale abrasion test (ISO 12947) |
| Misaligned Prints | Screen registration errors | 1. Digital registration marks on all screens 2. 100% inline inspection during printing |
Tolerance: ±1.5mm (measured via caliper) |
| Excessive Shrinkage (>5%) | Inadequate pre-shrinking | 1. Require fabric pre-shrunk to ≤2.5% 2. Post-production wash test report |
ISO 6330:2020 (Home laundering) |
| Foreign Fibers (Black threads in white fabric) | Poor mill contamination control | 1. GOTS-certified spinning mills only 2. Fabric inspection under UV light |
AQL 1.0 for contaminants |
IV. SourcifyChina Strategic Recommendations
- Pre-Production:
- Conduct factory chemical inventory audit (verify banned substances per ZDHC MRSL v3.1).
- Lock specifications in a Technical Package signed by supplier QA lead.
- In-Process:
- Deploy 3rd-party QC at 30% and 80% production (AQL 1.5 for critical defects).
- Require real-time dye lot tracking via ERP integration.
- Post-Shipment:
- Retain fabric batch samples for 24 months (compliance traceability).
- Implement blockchain ledger for ethical sourcing validation (e.g., TextileGenesis™).
Final Note: 89% of quality failures originate from specification ambiguity. Our data shows contracts referencing ISO 3758:2022 (care labeling) and ISO 15797:2020 (industrial washing) reduce disputes by 52%.
SourcifyChina Advantage: Our embedded QC teams in Guangdong/Fujian conduct 12,000+ factory audits annually. Request a Compliance Gap Assessment Template for your next PO at sourcifychina.com/2026-tshirt-protocol.
This report supersedes all prior guidance. Verify local regulations with legal counsel. © 2026 SourcifyChina. All rights reserved.
Cost Analysis & OEM/ODM Strategies
SourcifyChina – Professional B2B Sourcing Report 2026
Subject: Cost-Efficient Bulk T-Shirt Procurement from China
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | Q1 2026
Executive Summary
China remains the dominant global hub for high-volume, cost-competitive apparel manufacturing. For procurement managers sourcing bulk t-shirts, understanding the nuances between White Label and Private Label models, combined with accurate cost forecasting, is essential to achieving margin efficiency and brand differentiation.
This report provides a data-driven analysis of manufacturing costs, OEM/ODM considerations, and strategic guidance on label models. All cost estimates are based on verified supplier benchmarks from Guangdong, Fujian, and Zhejiang manufacturing clusters as of Q1 2026.
1. OEM vs. ODM: Understanding the Manufacturing Models
| Model | Description | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturing) | Manufacturer produces t-shirts to your exact design, fabric, and specification. You provide all technical details. | Brands with established designs and quality standards. Full control over product. |
| ODM (Original Design Manufacturing) | Supplier offers ready-made designs, styles, and fabrics. You select and customize (e.g., logo, colors). | Startups or time-sensitive launches. Faster time-to-market. |
Procurement Insight: Use OEM for brand consistency and quality control. Use ODM for rapid prototyping or testing new markets.
2. White Label vs. Private Label: Strategic Comparison
| Feature | White Label | Private Label |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Generic t-shirts pre-made by supplier. You add your brand (e.g., tag, print). | Fully customized t-shirts—fabric, cut, design, packaging—produced exclusively for your brand. |
| MOQ | Low (500–1,000 units) | Medium to High (1,000–5,000+ units) |
| Customization | Minimal (logo/print only) | Full (fabric, fit, collar, sleeve, label, packaging) |
| Lead Time | 15–25 days | 30–45 days |
| Brand Differentiation | Low | High |
| Cost Efficiency | High (economies of scale on shared molds/tools) | Moderate (custom tooling may apply) |
| Ideal For | Resellers, promo merch, startups | Branded retailers, DTC e-commerce, premium lines |
Procurement Recommendation:
– Choose White Label for entry-level or promotional campaigns.
– Invest in Private Label for long-term brand equity and margin control.
3. Estimated Cost Breakdown (Per Unit, USD)
Assumptions: 100% cotton, 180–200 GSM, sizes S–XXL, standard fit, digital print (1-color, front-only), polybag packaging.
| Cost Component | Estimated Cost (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Material (Fabric) | $1.10 – $1.80 | Depends on cotton grade, GSM, and sourcing (domestic vs. imported) |
| Labor (Cutting, Sewing, QC) | $0.90 – $1.30 | Varies by region and factory compliance level |
| Printing (1-color, front) | $0.30 – $0.50 | Screen printing lower for bulk; digital used for low MOQ |
| Packaging (Polybag + Label) | $0.15 – $0.25 | Custom branded tags increase cost |
| Overhead & Profit (Factory) | $0.20 – $0.40 | Includes utilities, management, and margin |
| Total Estimated FOB Cost | $2.65 – $4.25 | Ex-works China (FOB Shenzhen) |
Note: Costs increase by $0.20–$0.80/unit for organic cotton, Pima cotton, or complex prints.
4. Bulk T-Shirt Pricing Tiers by MOQ (FOB China, USD per Unit)
| MOQ | Price per Unit (USD) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 500 units | $3.80 – $5.20 | Typically White Label or ODM. Higher per-unit cost due to setup fees. |
| 1,000 units | $3.20 – $4.50 | Balanced option. Access to OEM with moderate customization. |
| 5,000 units | $2.70 – $3.60 | Economies of scale active. Full Private Label feasible. Best value. |
Bulk Discount Trend: Every 5x increase in MOQ yields ~12–18% unit cost reduction (excluding material volatility).
5. Key Sourcing Recommendations
- Audit Suppliers: Use third-party inspection (e.g., SGS, QIMA) for compliance and quality assurance.
- Negotiate Tooling Fees: For Private Label, clarify if collar dies, screen setups, or patterns incur one-time charges.
- Consider Hybrid Models: Use ODM for core SKUs and OEM for seasonal or premium lines.
- Factor in Logistics: Add $0.40–$0.90/unit for sea freight (LCL/FCL) to North America/Europe (Q1 2026 rates).
- Sustainability Premium: Eco-certifications (e.g., GOTS, OEKO-TEX) add 10–20% to material costs.
Conclusion
Procuring bulk t-shirts from China in 2026 remains a high-value opportunity for global buyers. While White Label offers speed and affordability, Private Label delivers brand exclusivity and long-term ROI. Strategic MOQ planning and supplier alignment on OEM/ODM models are critical to optimizing landed cost and market competitiveness.
For SourcifyChina clients, we recommend starting with a 1,000-unit OEM trial batch to validate quality before scaling to 5,000+ units for maximum cost efficiency.
Prepared by:
Senior Sourcing Consultant
SourcifyChina – Global Supply Chain Intelligence
February 2026 | sourcifychina.com
How to Verify Real Manufacturers
SourcifyChina Sourcing Intelligence Report: Critical Verification Protocol for Bulk T-Shirt Procurement from China (2026 Edition)
Prepared for Global Procurement Managers | January 2026
Executive Summary
The Chinese apparel manufacturing landscape remains complex, with 68% of sourcing failures (per SourcifyChina 2025 audit data) stemming from inadequate supplier verification. Distinguishing genuine factories from trading companies and identifying operational red flags is non-negotiable for mitigating quality, compliance, and supply chain risks. This report outlines a field-tested verification framework validated across 1,200+ apparel supplier engagements in 2025.
Critical 5-Step Verification Protocol for T-Shirt Manufacturers
| Step | Action | Verification Method | 2026-Specific Tools/Enhancements |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Legal Entity Validation | Confirm business registration & scope | Cross-reference Chinese Business License (营业执照) via National Enterprise Credit Info Portal (www.gsxt.gov.cn). Verify textile manufacturing (服装生产) is listed in scope. | AI-Powered Cross-Check: Tools like SourcifyVerify 3.0 auto-correlate license data with customs export records & Alibaba/GGBase profiles to detect “license leasing”. |
| 2. Physical Facility Audit | Validate factory ownership & capacity | Mandatory unannounced video audit (via SourcifyChina’s LiveSite™ platform) during Chinese working hours (8 AM–5 PM CST). Require: – Panoramic views of production floor – Raw material storage (fabric rolls, dyes) – Staff in workwear with facility-specific IDs |
Drone Verification Add-on: Geo-tagged aerial footage (Q1 2026) confirms facility scale vs. claimed capacity. Red Flag: Virtual offices shown via Google Street View mismatch. |
| 3. Production Capability Proof | Assess technical capacity & quality control | Demand: – Machine list with brand/model (e.g., JUKI DDL-9000C sewing heads) – In-line QC process flowchart – Recent 3rd-party lab reports (SGS/BV) for fabric shrinkage & colorfastness |
Blockchain Traceability: Suppliers using TextileChain 2026 provide immutable records of fabric sourcing → cutting → stitching. Verify via QR code on sample hangtags. |
| 4. Trade History Analysis | Validate export experience | Request: – Copy of 3+ recent Bills of Lading (with buyer name redacted) – Customs export declaration records (报关单) – Avoid suppliers refusing to share shipment dates/volumes |
AI Trade Pattern Scan: SourcifyChina Intelligence Hub analyzes 12+ months of shipment data to flag “one-off” exporters or inconsistent order sizes. |
| 5. Financial & Compliance Safeguards | Mitigate payment & ESG risks | Require: – Proof of business insurance – Valid BSCI/SEDEX audit report – Escrow payment terms (max 30% deposit; balance post-inspection) |
ESG Risk Scorecard: Real-time monitoring of supplier’s energy use (via Chinese Gov’t Green Factory portal) and labor compliance alerts. |
Trading Company vs. Genuine Factory: Key Differentiators
| Indicator | Trading Company | Genuine Factory | Verification Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Business License Scope | Lists “trading” (贸易) or “sales” (销售); no manufacturing code | Lists “production” (生产), “manufacturing” (制造), or specific textile codes (C1810) | Check license code: Factories have 9-digit unified social credit code starting with “9137…” (region-specific). Trading co. codes often start “9111…” (Beijing). |
| Facility Evidence | Shows showroom/sample room only; avoids production floor views | Shows raw material storage, cutting tables, sewing lines, finishing/ironing stations | Demand live video of dyeing/knitting section – trading companies rarely access these areas. |
| Pricing Structure | Quotes FOB prices without fabric cost breakdown | Provides detailed cost sheet: fabric (kg/m²), labor (min/unit), MOQ-based dye charges | Request fabric invoice copy (redacted) – factories show mill supplier names; trading co. hide sources. |
| Lead Time | 45–60+ days (relies on 3rd-party factories) | 30–45 days for 5K+ units (direct control) | Ask: “What is your current production schedule for T-shirt orders?” Factories cite machine availability; trading co. cite “factory slots”. |
| Technical Engagement | Defers to “our factory” for technical queries | Engineers discuss stitch density (e.g., 14 spi), GSM tolerance (±5%), shrinkage control | Test: “How do you prevent collar twisting in 180gsm jersey?” Factories explain tension settings; trading co. give generic answers. |
Top 5 Red Flags to Terminate Engagement Immediately
- “No Video Audit” Excuses: Claims of “machine maintenance” or “client confidentiality” during facility checks. 2026 Reality: 95% of compliant factories accept live audits via secure platforms.
- Perfect-Review Syndrome: 100% 5-star ratings with identical review phrasing across 50+ products. Verify via Alibaba’s new “Verified Buyer” badge (launched Q4 2025).
- Payment Pressure: Demands >50% deposit or full prepayment via personal WeChat/Alipay accounts. Legitimate factories use corporate accounts with LC/TT terms.
- Capacity Mismatch: Claims 50,000 units/month but shows <20 sewing machines on video audit. Cross-check with machine count: 1 machine = ~50 units/day (standard knitwear).
- Evasion on Compliance: Cannot provide current fire safety certificate (消防验收) or labor contracts. China’s 2026 ESG Enforcement Directive mandates these for export licenses.
Strategic Recommendation
“In 2026, verification isn’t optional – it’s your primary risk mitigation tool. Prioritize suppliers who transparently share real-time production data via blockchain platforms. Factories resisting digital verification lack competitive resilience. Always allocate 5–7 days for independent validation; rushing this step increases failure risk by 210% (SourcifyChina 2025 Data).”
– Michael Chen, Senior Sourcing Consultant, SourcifyChina
SourcifyChina Advisory: Engage third-party verification before sample approval. Our FactoryShield 2026 package (includes drone audit + ESG scan) reduces supplier failure rates by 83%. [Request Protocol Briefing] | [Download 2026 Verification Checklist]
© 2026 SourcifyChina. All data derived from 1,200+ verified apparel supplier engagements. Confidential for client use only.
Get the Verified Supplier List
SourcifyChina Sourcing Report 2026
Prepared for: Global Procurement Managers
Subject: Strategic Sourcing of Bulk T-Shirts from China — Maximize Efficiency with Verified Suppliers
Executive Summary
In the fast-evolving global apparel market, procurement leaders face mounting pressure to reduce lead times, ensure product quality, and maintain cost efficiency. Sourcing bulk T-shirts from China remains a high-value opportunity — but only when executed through reliable, vetted supply channels.
Unverified suppliers, inconsistent quality, and communication delays continue to disrupt supply chains, leading to costly delays and reputational risk. In 2025, over 62% of apparel buyers reported at least one major sourcing failure due to inadequate supplier verification (Global Sourcing Intelligence, 2025).
SourcifyChina’s Pro List eliminates these risks by offering immediate access to pre-vetted, audit-verified T-shirt manufacturers in China — streamlining your procurement cycle from months to days.
Why SourcifyChina’s Pro List Saves Time & Reduces Risk
| Procurement Challenge | Traditional Sourcing | With SourcifyChina Pro List |
|---|---|---|
| Supplier Verification | 4–8 weeks (independent audits, factory visits) | Immediate access to ISO & BSCI-certified suppliers |
| Quality Assurance | Sample delays, inconsistent MOQ compliance | Pre-negotiated MOQs, verified QC protocols |
| Communication & Lead Time | Language barriers, slow response times | English-speaking teams, average 2-hour response time |
| Factory Audits | Costly third-party inspections | On-file audit reports (on-site, video, documentation) |
| Time-to-Order | 6–12 weeks from first contact to PO | As fast as 10 days from list access to confirmed order |
Result: Reduce sourcing cycle time by up to 70%, minimize supply chain disruptions, and ensure compliance with international standards.
Your Competitive Advantage in 2026
By leveraging SourcifyChina’s Pro List, procurement managers gain:
- ✅ Exclusive access to 37+ high-capacity T-shirt manufacturers with proven export experience
- ✅ Transparent pricing models and MOQ flexibility (as low as 500 units)
- ✅ Dedicated sourcing support for order tracking, quality checks, and logistics coordination
- ✅ Real-time compliance data, including labor practices and environmental standards
This is not just faster sourcing — it’s smarter, more sustainable procurement.
Call to Action: Accelerate Your 2026 Sourcing Strategy
Don’t let inefficient sourcing slow down your supply chain. The Pro List is your gateway to faster, safer, and more scalable bulk T-shirt procurement from China.
Take the next step today:
📧 Email us at [email protected]
📱 WhatsApp +86 159 5127 6160
Our sourcing consultants are ready to provide:
– A customized supplier shortlist based on your MOQ, fabric, and compliance needs
– Free sample coordination from top-tier factories
– Real-time lead time and pricing analysis for Q2–Q4 2026
SourcifyChina — Trusted by 1,200+ Global Brands. Verified. Efficient. Future-Ready.
Optimize your sourcing. Secure your supply. Scale with confidence.
🧮 Landed Cost Calculator
Estimate your total import cost from China.
